• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泰国他汀类药物治疗患者二级心血管疾病预防中使用非他汀类调脂药物的成本效果分析。

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Non-Statin Lipid-Modifying Agents for Secondary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Statin-Treated Patients in Thailand.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Oct;37(10):1277-1286. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00820-6.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-019-00820-6
PMID:31243736
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using non-statin lipid-modifying agents in combination with statin therapy provides additional benefits for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction, but their value for money has only been evaluated in high-income countries (HICs). Furthermore, studies mainly derive effectiveness data from a single trial or older meta-analyses.

OBJECTIVES

Our study used data from the most recent network meta-analysis (NMA) and local parameters to assess the cost effectiveness of non-statin agents in statin-treated patients with a history of CVD.

METHODS

A published Markov model was adopted to investigate lifetime outcomes: (1) number of recurrent CVD events prevented, (2) quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, (3) costs and (4) incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) and ezetimibe added to statin therapy. Event rates and effectiveness inputs were obtained from the NMA. Cost and utility data were gathered from published studies conducted in Thailand. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Patients receiving PCSK9i and ezetimibe experienced fewer recurrent CVD events (number needed to treat [NNT] 17 and 30) and more QALYs (0.168 and 0.096 QALYs gained per person). However, under the societal perspective and at current acquisition costs in 2018, ICERs of both agents were $US1,223,995 and 27,361 per QALY gained, respectively. Based on threshold analyses, the costs need to be reduced by 97 and 85%, respectively, for PCSK9i and ezetimibe to be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the proven effectiveness of PCSK9i and ezetimibe, the costs of these agents need to reduce to a much greater extent than in HICs to be cost-effective in Thailand.

摘要

背景

在他汀类药物治疗的基础上联合使用非他汀类调脂药物可进一步降低心血管疾病(CVD)风险,但这些药物的性价比仅在高收入国家(HIC)得到了评估。此外,研究主要从单一试验或较旧的荟萃分析中得出有效性数据。

目的

本研究利用最新网络荟萃分析(NMA)和当地参数的数据,评估有 CVD 病史的他汀类药物治疗患者使用非他汀类药物的成本效果。

方法

采用已发表的马尔可夫模型来调查终生结局:(1)预防复发 CVD 事件的数量,(2)获得的质量调整生命年(QALYs),(3)成本和(4)在他汀类药物治疗基础上加用前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素 9 抑制剂(PCSK9i)和依折麦布的增量成本效果比(ICER)。事件发生率和有效性输入来自 NMA。成本和效用数据来自在泰国进行的已发表研究。进行了一系列敏感性分析。

结果

接受 PCSK9i 和依折麦布治疗的患者发生的复发 CVD 事件较少(需要治疗的人数[NNT]分别为 17 和 30),获得的 QALYs 更多(每人分别增加 0.168 和 0.096 QALYs)。然而,在社会视角下,且按照 2018 年的现行采购成本,这两种药物的 ICER 分别为每获得一个 QALY 需花费 1,223,995 美元和 27,361 美元。基于阈值分析,PCSK9i 和依折麦布的成本需要分别降低 97%和 85%,才能具有成本效果。

结论

尽管 PCSK9i 和依折麦布已被证实有效,但这些药物的成本需要比在 HIC 中降低更多的幅度,才能在泰国具有成本效果。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Non-Statin Lipid-Modifying Agents for Secondary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Statin-Treated Patients in Thailand.泰国他汀类药物治疗患者二级心血管疾病预防中使用非他汀类调脂药物的成本效果分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Oct;37(10):1277-1286. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00820-6.
2
Updated Cost-effectiveness Assessments of PCSK9 Inhibitors From the Perspectives of the Health System and Private Payers: Insights Derived From the FOURIER Trial.从医疗体系和私人支付方的角度来看依洛尤单抗的最新成本效益评估: FOURIER 试验得出的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1369-1374. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3655.
3
Estimating the health benefits and costs associated with ezetimibe coadministered with statin therapy compared with higher dose statin monotherapy in patients with established cardiovascular disease: results of a Markov model for UK costs using data registries.在已确诊心血管疾病的患者中,评估与他汀类药物联合依折麦布治疗相比,高剂量他汀类药物单药治疗的健康益处和成本:使用数据登记处对英国成本进行马尔可夫模型分析的结果。
Clin Ther. 2008 Aug;30(8):1508-23. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.002.
4
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ezetimibe as the Add-on Treatment to Moderate-Dose Rosuvastatin versus High-Dose Rosuvastatin in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in China: A Markov Model Analysis.依折麦布作为中等剂量瑞舒伐他汀附加治疗与大剂量瑞舒伐他汀在中国心血管疾病二级预防中的成本效益分析:马尔可夫模型分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2020 Jan 14;14:157-165. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S213968. eCollection 2020.
5
Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.载脂蛋白 B 代谢途径抑制剂治疗杂合子型家族性高胆固醇血症或动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):743-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11004.
6
Economic evaluation of ezetimibe treatment in combination with statin therapy in the United States.美国依折麦布与他汀类药物联合治疗的经济学评估。
J Med Econ. 2017 Jul;20(7):723-731. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1320559. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Simvastatin Plus Ezetimibe for Cardiovascular Prevention in Patients With a History of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis of Results of the IMPROVE-IT Trial.辛伐他汀联合依折麦布用于急性冠状动脉综合征病史患者心血管预防的成本效益:IMPROVE-IT试验结果分析
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jun;27(6):656-665. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.05.139. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
8
The cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitors - The Australian healthcare perspective.PCSK9 抑制剂的成本效益-澳大利亚医疗保健视角。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;267:183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.122. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
9
Comparison of Evolocumab and Ezetimibe, Both Combined with Statin Therapy, for Patients with Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from the Chinese Healthcare Perspective.依洛尤单抗或依折麦布联合他汀类药物治疗近期急性冠脉综合征患者的成本效果分析:基于中国医疗保健视角。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Oct;37(5):905-916. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07276-x. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.依泽替米贝、依洛尤单抗、阿利西尤单抗、二十碳五烯酸乙酯或非诺贝特联合他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗相比的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):643-656. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility analysis of Coronary Artery Calcium screening to guide statin prescription among intermediate-risk patients in Thailand.泰国中危患者中冠状动脉钙化筛查以指导他汀类药物处方的成本效用分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 21;20(8):e0330425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330425. eCollection 2025.
2
Renal denervation for hypertension: cross-country cost-effectiveness insights from mainland China, Japan, and Thailand.肾去神经术治疗高血压:来自中国内地、日本和泰国的跨国成本效益分析见解
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Aug 13;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00669-w.
3
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in Chinese patients with intermediate and high surgical risk for aortic stenosis: a decision analysis on effect, affordability and cost-effectiveness.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Non-statin Lipid-Modifying Agents on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Among Statin-Treated Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.非他汀类调脂药物对他汀治疗患者心血管发病率和死亡率的影响:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 22;10:547. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00547. eCollection 2019.
2
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会/美国心血管和肺康复协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏协会/美国预防医学学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会/美国国家脂质协会/美国初级保健医师学会血胆固醇管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):3168-3209. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
3
经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中国中高危主动脉瓣狭窄患者的效果、可负担性和成本效益的决策分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 18;14(11):e082283. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082283.
4
Projected Cost Savings With Optimal Medication Adherence in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease Requiring Lipid-Lowering Therapy: A Multinational Economic Evaluation Study.降脂治疗的心血管疾病患者最佳药物依从性的预期成本节约:一项多国经济评估研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 19;13(22):e037792. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037792. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
5
Using real world evidence to generate cost-effectiveness analysis of fibrinolytic therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Thailand.利用真实世界证据进行泰国ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者纤溶治疗的成本效益分析。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Jun 24;26:100503. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100503. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Ezetimibe plus statin lipid-lowering therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.依折麦布联合他汀类药物降脂治疗的成本效果分析:成本效用研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0264563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264563. eCollection 2022.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness of Hyperlipidemia Medication in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review.低收入和中等收入国家高脂血症药物治疗的成本效益:一项综述。
Glob Heart. 2022 Mar 4;17(1):18. doi: 10.5334/gh.1097. eCollection 2022.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Germany.降脂治疗在德国心血管预防中的成本效益。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Aug;37(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07310-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Incremental net benefit of lipid-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-utility studies.PCSK9 抑制剂降脂治疗的增量净效益:成本效益研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;78(3):351-363. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03242-6. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of hemodialysis plus hemoperfusion versus hemodialysis alone in adult patients with end-stage renal disease in China.中国成年终末期肾病患者血液透析联合血液灌流与单纯血液透析的成本效益分析
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jul;9(14):1133. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1100.
Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome.依洛尤单抗与急性冠脉综合征后的心血管结局。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2097-2107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
4
Are PCSK9 Inhibitors Cost Effective?PCSK9 抑制剂是否具有成本效益?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Sep;36(9):1031-1041. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0671-0.
5
The cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitors - The Australian healthcare perspective.PCSK9 抑制剂的成本效益-澳大利亚医疗保健视角。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Sep 15;267:183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.122. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab Therapy for Reducing Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.依洛尤单抗治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者减少心血管事件的成本效果分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1069-1078. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2762.
7
Updated Cost-effectiveness Analysis of PCSK9 Inhibitors Based on the Results of the FOURIER Trial.基于FOURIER试验结果的PCSK9抑制剂最新成本效益分析
JAMA. 2017 Aug 22;318(8):748-750. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9924.
8
Modelling the cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitors vs. ezetimibe through LDL-C reductions in a Norwegian setting.在挪威环境下,通过 LDL-C 降低来模拟 PCSK9 抑制剂与依折麦布的成本效益。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):15-22. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvx010.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in Spain.依洛尤单抗在西班牙心血管高危患者中的成本效益分析
Clin Ther. 2017 Apr;39(4):771-786.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.011. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.依洛尤单抗与心血管疾病患者的临床结局。
N Engl J Med. 2017 May 4;376(18):1713-1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664. Epub 2017 Mar 17.