Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Spring;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.5080/u25738.
Resilience in schizophrenia has been associated with multiple clinical variables that, to the best of our knowledge, do not include impulsiveness, aggression and also personality and insight with possible influences, which remain as poorly investigated topics. This study investigated the relationships of resilience with depression, aggression, impulsivity, personality and insight in order to assess the factors that explain resilience in schizophrenia.
The study included 139 individuals with clinically stable schizophrenia. Data were acquired by means of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), the Schedule for Assessment of Insight (SAI), the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised-Abbreviated (EPQR-A), the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version (BIS-11) and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Correlations of the scores of the RSA with the scores of the other psychometric scales and the demographic and clinical data were evaluated. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the factors predicting resilience.
The PANSS total and general psychopathology scores and scale scores on depression, impulsiveness and aggression were negatively correlated with resilience scores. Attentional impulsiveness, neuroticism and depression predicted low levels of resilience. There were no significant correlations between insight and the total or subdimension scores of resilience except for the subdimension structural style.
Treatments focusing only on clinical remission in schizophrenia are not sufficiently effective. Interventions for enhancing resilience in schizophrenia should consider depressive symptoms, attentional impulsivity and personality traits such as neuroticism.
精神分裂症的韧性与多种临床变量有关,但据我们所知,这些变量不包括冲动、攻击性以及可能有影响的人格和洞察力,这些仍然是研究不足的课题。本研究调查了韧性与抑郁、攻击性、冲动性、人格和洞察力的关系,以评估解释精神分裂症韧性的因素。
该研究纳入了 139 名临床稳定的精神分裂症患者。数据通过成人韧性量表(RSA)、阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)、精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDSS)、洞察力评估量表(SAI)、艾森克人格问卷修订版-简短版(EPQR-A)、巴瑞特冲动量表第 11 版(BIS-11)和布氏攻击问卷(BPAQ)获得。评估 RSA 评分与其他心理计量学量表以及人口统计学和临床数据的评分之间的相关性。线性回归分析用于确定预测韧性的因素。
PANSS 总分和一般精神病学评分以及抑郁、冲动和攻击性量表评分与韧性评分呈负相关。注意力冲动、神经质和抑郁预测低水平的韧性。洞察力与韧性总分或分量表评分之间没有显著相关性,除了结构风格分量表。
仅关注精神分裂症临床缓解的治疗方法效果不够。增强精神分裂症韧性的干预措施应考虑抑郁症状、注意力冲动和神经质等人格特征。