Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jun;32(6):1410-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2022.03.005. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
Fish consumption has been associated with better health outcomes. Dietary patterns may vary substantially by neighborhood of residence. However, it is unclear if the benefits of a healthy diet are equivalent in different communities. This study examines associations of fish consumption with stroke incidence and stroke risk factors, and whether these differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES).
We studied 4007 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were 65 years or older and recruited between 1989 and 1990 from 4 US communities. Outcomes included fish consumption type (bakes/broiled vs. fried) and frequency, stroke incidence, and stroke risk factors. Multilevel regressions models were used to estimate fish consumption associations with clinical outcomes. Lower NSES was associated with higher consumption of fried fish (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10-1.98) and lower consumption of non-fried fish (0.64, 0.47-0.86). Frequent fried fish (11.9 vs. 9.2 person-years for at least once weekly vs. less than once a month, respectively) and less frequent non-fried fish (17.7 vs. 9.6 person-years for less than once a month vs. at least once weekly, respectively) were independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (p-values < 0.05). However, among those with similar levels of healthy fish consumption, residents with low NSES had less benefit on stroke risk reduction, compared with high NSES.
Fish consumption type and frequency both impact stroke risk. Benefits of healthy fish consumption differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status.
鱼类消费与更好的健康结果相关。饮食模式可能因居住的社区而有很大差异。然而,尚不清楚健康饮食的益处在不同社区是否相同。本研究考察了鱼类消费与中风发病率和中风危险因素的关联,以及这些关联是否因社区社会经济地位(NSES)而异。
我们研究了心血管健康研究中的 4007 名参与者,他们年龄在 65 岁或以上,于 1989 年至 1990 年期间从美国 4 个社区招募。结果包括鱼类消费类型(烘烤/烤 vs. 油炸)和频率、中风发病率和中风危险因素。使用多层次回归模型来估计鱼类消费与临床结果的关联。较低的 NSES 与较高的油炸鱼消费(aOR=1.47,95%CI:1.10-1.98)和较低的非油炸鱼消费(0.64,0.47-0.86)相关。频繁食用油炸鱼(11.9 与至少每周一次 vs. 每月不到一次,分别为 9.2 人年)和较少食用非油炸鱼(17.7 与每月不到一次 vs. 至少每周一次,分别为 9.6 人年)与中风风险增加独立相关(p 值<0.05)。然而,在具有相似健康鱼类消费水平的人群中,与高 NSES 相比,低 NSES 的居民在降低中风风险方面获益较少。
鱼类消费类型和频率都影响中风风险。健康鱼类消费的益处因社区社会经济地位而异。