Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Sep 14;42(10):1109-1116. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac032.
Aspiration prior to hyaluronic acid filler injection is often taught as a safety maneuver to minimize the risk of intravascular injection; however, the validity of this technique in aesthetic practice is being increasingly challenged. One key assumption underpinning the validity of the aspiration test is that the needle tip does not move during the aspiration and subsequent injection of filler.
The aim of this study was to visualize and measure needle tip movement in real time during aspiration and injection of filler. Secondary objectives were to assess the impact of injector experience and double-handed versus single-handed aspiration technique in maintaining stability of the syringe.
Under real-time ultrasound visualization, 3 injectors with different levels of experience injected hyaluronic acid filler into pork belly tissue utilizing both double-handed and single-handed aspiration techniques. Needle tip movements were recorded and measured by means of ultrasound and video.
The aspiration maneuver is in all cases associated with retrograde movement of the needle tip, ranging from 1.1 to 5.3 mm (mean, 2.9 mm), whereas injection leads to anterograde movement ranging from 0.6 to 4.1 mm (mean, 1.9 mm). Double-handed aspiration is associated with less needle tip movement than single-handed aspiration (P = 0.037). Greater experience is also associated less movement of the needle tip (P < 0.0001).
In all cases, the aspiration and injecting maneuver is associated with micromovements of the needle tip, of a magnitude consistently significant relative to the typical size of facial vessels. Although needle tip movement is only a single factor limiting the usefulness of the aspiration test, the results of this study suggest that it is not advisable to rely only on aspiration as a method to prevent intravascular injection.
在注射透明质酸填充物之前进行抽吸操作,通常被教授为一种安全措施,以最大限度地降低血管内注射的风险。然而,这种技术在美容实践中的有效性正受到越来越多的质疑。支撑抽吸试验有效性的一个关键假设是,在抽吸和随后注射填充物的过程中,针尖不会移动。
本研究旨在实时可视化和测量抽吸和注射填充物过程中的针尖运动。次要目标是评估注射器经验和双手与单手抽吸技术在保持注射器稳定性方面的影响。
在实时超声可视化下,3 名经验不同的注射器操作人员使用双手和单手抽吸技术,将透明质酸填充物注入猪腹组织。记录并通过超声和视频测量针尖的运动。
抽吸操作始终与针尖的逆行运动相关,针尖运动范围为 1.1 至 5.3 毫米(平均 2.9 毫米),而注射导致针尖的顺行运动,范围为 0.6 至 4.1 毫米(平均 1.9 毫米)。双手抽吸与单手抽吸相比,针尖运动幅度更小(P=0.037)。经验越丰富,针尖的运动幅度也越小(P<0.0001)。
在所有情况下,抽吸和注射操作都伴随着针尖的微小运动,其幅度相对于典型的面部血管大小始终具有显著意义。尽管针尖运动只是限制抽吸试验有用性的一个因素,但本研究的结果表明,仅依赖抽吸作为预防血管内注射的方法是不可取的。