University of Michigan, School of Social Work, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
University of Michigan-Flint, Department of Social Work, 303 E. Kearsley St., Flint, MI 48502, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jun;128:105606. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105606. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
Caregivers use a variety of disciplinary methods to respond to undesired child behavior. Many caregivers use nonaggressive forms of discipline, such as verbal reasoning and redirection. Some caregivers use aggressive forms of discipline, such as spanking and yelling. However, most caregivers use a combination of aggressive and nonaggressive discipline. To date, a disproportionately small number of caregiver discipline studies are conducted in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and few studies in low-resource contexts examine aggressive and nonaggressive behaviors simultaneously.
This study aims to elucidate caregiver patterns of 11 disciplinary behaviors used in LMICs, and examine how these patterns relate to child outcomes and household characteristics.
Data came from the fourth and fifth rounds of UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) distributed between 2009 and 2017 (N = 218,824 respondents across 63 countries). Focal children were 3-4 years old.
Patterns of disciplinary behaviors were estimated using a multilevel latent class analysis (LCA). Multinomial regression analyses examined associations of disciplinary patterns with caregiver-reported child outcomes and household characteristics.
The LCA suggested caregiver discipline fell into three overall patterns: high behavioral control, moderate behavior control, and lower behavioral control. The lower behavioral control class was associated with the most advantageous child outcomes and household socio-demographic characteristics, whereas the high behavioral control class was associated with the most disadvantageous child outcomes and household characteristics.
Efforts should be employed to reduce aggressive behaviors and promote positive parenting among caregivers in LMICs.
照料者会采用各种纪律方法来应对儿童的不当行为。许多照料者会使用非攻击性的纪律形式,例如口头说理和引导。一些照料者会使用攻击性的纪律形式,例如打屁股和吼叫。然而,大多数照料者会同时使用攻击性和非攻击性的纪律形式。迄今为止,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)进行的照料者纪律研究数量相对较少,而且在资源匮乏的环境中,很少有研究同时考察攻击性和非攻击性行为。
本研究旨在阐明在 LMICs 中使用的 11 种纪律行为的照料者模式,并研究这些模式如何与儿童结果和家庭特征相关。
数据来自联合国儿童基金会多指标类集调查(MICS)的第四和第五轮调查(2009 年至 2017 年期间在 63 个国家共有 218824 名受访者)。焦点儿童为 3-4 岁。
使用多层次潜在类别分析(LCA)来估计纪律行为模式。多项回归分析考察了纪律模式与照料者报告的儿童结果和家庭特征之间的关联。
LCA 表明,照料者纪律可分为三种总体模式:高行为控制、中行为控制和低行为控制。低行为控制类与最有利的儿童结果和家庭社会人口学特征相关,而高行为控制类与最不利的儿童结果和家庭特征相关。
应努力减少 LMICs 中照料者的攻击性行为并促进积极育儿。