Zhang Jiandang, Yu Yang, Gao Shangju, Hai Yong, Wu Bing, Su Xiaojing, Wang Zheng
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Nankai University School of Medicine, Nankai District, 94 Weijin Road, Tianjin, 300071, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Mar 29;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05246-4.
Retrospective case-control radiographic study.
To identify main effects of preoperative pattern and global coronal malalignment (GCM) on postoperative coronal imbalance in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients and evaluate the rationality of the classification of coronal deformity based on preoperative GCM. A classification of coronal deformity based on preoperative GCM (20 mm set as the threshold of coronal imbalance) has been proposed recently, but whether it is practical is unclear.
One hundred twelve DLS patients treated with posterior instrumented fusion were reviewed. Coronal measurements included GCM and major Cobb angle. Based on relationship between C7 PL and major curve, preoperative patterns were classified into: Pattern 1(concave pattern), C7 PL shifted to the concave side of major curve; Pattern 2(convex pattern), C7 PL shifted to the convex side of major curve. Patients were separated into 4 groups (3 types): Type 0-1: GCM < 20 mm plus Pattern 1; Type 0-2: GCM < 20 mm plus Pattern 2; Type 1: GCM > 20 mm plus Pattern 1; Type 2: GCM > 20 mm plus Pattern 2. After comparison within patterns or among 4 groups, further factorial analysis was performed.
Significant differences regarding postoperative GCM or coronal imbalance/balance ratio existed among 4 groups (F = 6.219, p = 0.001; x = 22.506, p < 0.001, respectively), despite no significant difference in intra-pattern 1(concave pattern) or intra-pattern 2(convex pattern) groups. Two-way analysis of variance showed preoperative pattern exhibited significant effect on postoperative GCM or imbalance/balance ratio (F = 14.286, p < 0.001; F = 30.514, p < 0.001, respectively) while neither preoperative GCM alone nor interaction of preoperative GCM with pattern did.
In DLS patients, it's the preoperative pattern other than GCM that had main effects on postoperative coronal imbalance. Classification of coronal deformity based on preoperative GCM is questionable.
回顾性病例对照影像学研究。
确定术前形态和整体冠状面排列不齐(GCM)对退行性腰椎侧凸(DLS)患者术后冠状面失衡的主要影响,并评估基于术前GCM的冠状面畸形分类的合理性。最近有人提出基于术前GCM(将冠状面失衡阈值设定为20毫米)的冠状面畸形分类,但尚不清楚其是否实用。
回顾了112例接受后路器械融合治疗的DLS患者。冠状面测量包括GCM和主要 Cobb角。根据C7 PL与主要曲线的关系,术前形态分为:形态1(凹侧型),C7 PL向主要曲线的凹侧移位;形态2(凸侧型),C7 PL向主要曲线的凸侧移位。患者分为4组(3种类型):0-1型:GCM<20毫米+形态1;0-2型:GCM<20毫米+形态2;1型:GCM>20毫米+形态1;2型:GCM>20毫米+形态2。在各形态组内或4组之间进行比较后,进一步进行析因分析。
4组之间术后GCM或冠状面失衡/平衡比存在显著差异(F = 6.219,p = 0.001;x = 22.506,p<0.001),尽管形态1(凹侧型)组内或形态2(凸侧型)组内无显著差异。双向方差分析显示,术前形态对术后GCM或失衡/平衡比有显著影响(F = 14.286,p<0.001;F = 30.514,p<0.001),而单独的术前GCM或术前GCM与形态的交互作用均无显著影响。
在DLS患者中,对术后冠状面失衡起主要作用的是术前形态而非GCM。基于术前GCM的冠状面畸形分类存在疑问。