Suppr超能文献

冠状面失平衡对成人症状性腰椎畸形矫正性脊柱手术的手术结果有何影响。

How coronal malalignment affects the surgical outcome in corrective spine surgery for adult symptomatic lumbar deformity.

机构信息

National Hospital Organization Murayama Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Spine Deform. 2024 Mar;12(2):451-462. doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00780-0. Epub 2023 Nov 18.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The importance of coronal alignment is unclear, while the importance of sagittal alignment in the treatment of adult patients with spinal deformities is well described. This study sought to elucidate the impact of global coronal malalignment (GCMA) in surgically treated adult symptomatic lumbar deformity (ASLD) patients.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective analysis of a prospective ASD database. GCMA was defined as GCA (C7PL-CSVL) ≥ 3 cm. GCMA is categorized based on the Obeid-Coronal Malalignment Classification (O-CM). Demographic, surgical, radiographic, HRQOL, and complication data were analysed. The risk for postoperative GCMA was analysed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of 230 surgically treated ASLD patients, 96 patients showed GCMA preoperatively and baseline GCA was correlated with the baseline SRS-22 pain domain score (r = - 30). Postoperatively, 62 patients (27%, O-CM type 1: 41[18%], type 2: 21[9%]) developed GCMA. The multivariate risk analysis indicated dementia (OR 20.1[1.2-304.4]), diabetes (OR 5.9[1.3-27.3]), and baseline O-CM type 2 (OR 2.1[1.3-3.4]) as independent risk factors for postoperative GCMA. The 2-year SRS-22 score was not different between the 2 groups, while 4 GCMA patients required revision surgery within 1 year after surgery due to coronal decompensation (GCMA+ vs. GCMA- function: 3.6 ± 0.6 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7, pain: 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, self-image: 3.6 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.8, mental health: 3.7 ± 0.8 vs. 3.8 ± 0.9, satisfaction: 3.9 ± 0.9 vs. 3.9 ± 0.8, total: 3.7 ± 0.7 vs. 3.7 ± 0.7). Additionally, the comparisons of 2-yr SRS-22 between GCMA ± showed no difference in any UIV and LIV level or O-CM type.

CONCLUSIONS

In ASLD patients with corrective spine surgery, GCMA at 2 years did not affect HRQOL or major complications at any spinal fusion extent or O-CM type of malalignment, whereas GCA correlated with pain intensity before surgery. These findings may warrant further study of the impact of GCMA on HRQOL in the surgical treatment of ASLD patients.

摘要

目的

冠状面对线的重要性尚不清楚,而矢状面对线在治疗成人脊柱畸形中的重要性已得到充分描述。本研究旨在阐明全球冠状面失平衡(GCMA)在接受手术治疗的成人症状性腰椎畸形(ASLD)患者中的影响。

方法

对前瞻性 ASD 数据库进行多中心回顾性分析。GCMA 定义为 GCA(C7PL-CSVL)≥3cm。GCMA 根据 Obeid-Coronal Malalignment Classification(O-CM)进行分类。分析了人口统计学、手术、影像学、HRQOL 和并发症数据。通过单变量和多变量分析分析了术后 GCMA 的风险。

结果

在 230 例接受手术治疗的 ASLD 患者中,96 例患者术前存在 GCMA,基线 GCA 与基线 SRS-22 疼痛域评分呈负相关(r=-30)。术后 62 例(27%,O-CM 1 型:41[18%],2 型:21[9%])发生 GCMA。多变量风险分析表明痴呆(OR 20.1[1.2-304.4])、糖尿病(OR 5.9[1.3-27.3])和基线 O-CM 2 型(OR 2.1[1.3-3.4])是术后 GCMA 的独立危险因素。两组患者术后 2 年 SRS-22 评分无差异,但 4 例 GCMA 患者术后 1 年内因冠状面失代偿而需要翻修手术(GCMA+与 GCMA-功能:3.6±0.6 与 3.7±0.7,疼痛:3.7±0.8 与 3.8±0.8,自我形象:3.6±0.8 与 3.6±0.8,心理健康:3.7±0.8 与 3.8±0.9,满意度:3.9±0.9 与 3.9±0.8,总分:3.7±0.7 与 3.7±0.7)。此外,GCMA±在任何 UIV 和 LIV 水平或 O-CM 类型的比较中,2 年 SRS-22 之间的比较没有差异。

结论

在接受脊柱矫正手术的 ASLD 患者中,2 年后的 GCMA 不会影响任何脊柱融合程度或 O-CM 类型的 HRQOL 或主要并发症,而 GCA 与术前疼痛强度相关。这些发现可能需要进一步研究 GCMA 对 ASLD 患者手术治疗后 HRQOL 的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验