• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超亲水表面处理 CA 种植体预后的长期评估:回顾性临床研究。

Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, 13620, Korea.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Capital Dental Hospital, Armed Forces Medical Command, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0
PMID:35351072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8966311/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy of the CA implants (Osstem Implant, Busan, Korea), calcium-modified surfaced treated implants on acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina.

METHODS

From January 2013 to December 2015, 258 implants of 120 patients placed between 2013 and 2015 were retrospectively studied. Using medical records and periapical radiographs, sex, age, location, fixture width and length of placed implants, presence or absence of bone graft, types of bone substitutes and membrane used for bone grafting, primary and secondary stability, initial and delayed complications, and marginal bone loss were investigated. The success rate and survival rate of the implants in each group were analyzed retrospectively based on the criteria suggested by Albrektsson et al. RESULTS: Between 2013 and 2015, with a follow-up longer than 5 years, 258 implants with an average diameter of 4.63 mm (3.5-5.5 mm) and an average length of 9.94 mm (7.0-13.0 mm) were placed in a total of 120 patients (61 males and 59 females) with a mean age of 63.7 years for an average of 62 months of observation period. The survival rate was 97.3%, the success rate was 94.2%, and the average final marginal bone loss was 0.074 mm.

CONCLUSION

The CA implants manufactured with the improved surface treatment method exhibited a survival rate of 97.3% and a success rate of 94.2% over an average observation period of 62 months. The implants were not affected by most factors and had very high survival and success rates over a long period of observation. In particular, the stability of the implant was excellent, with no cases of failed implants in delayed placement after bone grafting and a healing period.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估 CA 种植体(Osstem Implant,韩国釜山)的长期临床疗效,该种植体为经酸蚀处理的钙改性表面喷砂氧化铝处理种植体。

方法

回顾性研究了 2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间 120 名患者的 258 枚种植体。通过病历和根尖片,调查了植入物的性别、年龄、部位、植入物的固定器宽度和长度、是否存在骨移植、使用的骨替代物和移植膜的类型、初次和延迟并发症、以及边缘骨吸收情况。根据 Albrektsson 等人提出的标准,分析了每个组中种植体的成功率和存活率。

结果

2013 年至 2015 年间,对 258 枚种植体进行了随访,随访时间超过 5 年,平均直径为 4.63mm(3.5-5.5mm),平均长度为 9.94mm(7.0-13.0mm),共植入 120 名患者(61 名男性和 59 名女性),平均年龄为 63.7 岁,平均观察期为 62 个月。存活率为 97.3%,成功率为 94.2%,最终平均边缘骨吸收量为 0.074mm。

结论

采用改进表面处理方法制造的 CA 种植体在平均 62 个月的观察期内,存活率为 97.3%,成功率为 94.2%。该种植体不受大多数因素影响,在长期观察中具有非常高的存活率和成功率。特别是,种植体的稳定性非常好,在骨移植和愈合期后延迟放置的情况下,没有种植体失败的病例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c5/8966311/27a9615934f3/12903_2022_2142_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c5/8966311/27a9615934f3/12903_2022_2142_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/76c5/8966311/27a9615934f3/12903_2022_2142_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of super hydrophilic surface treated CA implants: a retrospective clinical study.超亲水表面处理 CA 种植体预后的长期评估:回顾性临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02142-0.
2
The long-term evaluation of the prognosis of implants with acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina: a retrospective clinical study.氧化铝喷砂酸蚀表面种植体预后的长期评估:一项回顾性临床研究。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr 8;42(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00255-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.使用3种不同瓣方法进行牙槽嵴劈开扩展以植入牙种植体时的边缘骨稳定性:一项为期1年的临床研究
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Sep;67(9):1921-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.017.
4
Sinus bone graft using new alloplastic bone graft material (Osteon)-II: clinical evaluation.使用新型异体骨移植材料(Osteon)-II进行鼻窦骨移植:临床评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Mar;109(3):e14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.047.
5
Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement.鼻窦骨移植和种植体植入后鼻窦骨吸收及边缘骨丢失的评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Feb;107(2):e21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.033.
6
Ridge expansion alone or in combination with guided bone regeneration to facilitate implant placement in narrow alveolar ridges: a retrospective study.单纯牙槽嵴扩展或联合引导骨再生以促进在狭窄牙槽嵴中植入种植体:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):204-11. doi: 10.1111/clr.12317. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
7
Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.种植体设计对早期负载、化学改良、喷砂酸蚀表面种植体周围边缘骨变化的影响:犬的组织学分析。
J Periodontol. 2011 Jul;82(7):1025-34. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100491. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
8
Retrospective evaluation of crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: the effect of bone grafting at implant placement.回顾性评估非潜入式和亚基底部位置降低基台直径种植体周围的牙槽骨变化:种植体植入时植骨的效果。
J Periodontol. 2011 Feb;82(2):234-42. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100340. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
9
A prospective multicenter clinical trial comparing one- and two-stage titanium screw-shaped fixtures with one-stage plasma-sprayed solid-screw fixtures.一项前瞻性多中心临床试验,比较单阶段和两阶段钛螺旋形种植体与单阶段等离子喷涂实心螺旋种植体。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(3):159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00007.x.
10
Retrospective multicenter evaluation of tapered implant with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface at 1 to 4 years of function.1 至 4 年功能的喷砂酸蚀表面锥形种植体的回顾性多中心评估。
Implant Dent. 2011 Aug;20(4):280-4. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e318218123b.

本文引用的文献

1
Long term clinical result of implant induced injury on the adjacent tooth.种植体对邻牙造成损伤的长期临床结果。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87062-9.
2
The long-term evaluation of the prognosis of implants with acid-etched surfaces sandblasted with alumina: a retrospective clinical study.氧化铝喷砂酸蚀表面种植体预后的长期评估:一项回顾性临床研究。
Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Apr 8;42(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40902-020-00255-6. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Clinical Evaluation of Three Surgical Modalities in the Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
三种手术方式治疗种植体周围炎的临床评估:一项随机对照临床试验
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 3;8(7):966. doi: 10.3390/jcm8070966.
4
Prospective randomized clinical trial of hydrophilic tapered implant placement at maxillary posterior area: 6 weeks and 12 weeks loading.上颌后部区域亲水性锥形种植体植入的前瞻性随机临床试验:6周和12周负重
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Oct;8(5):396-403. doi: 10.4047/jap.2016.8.5.396. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
Efficacy of 0.12% Chlorhexidine Gluconate for Non-Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implant Mucositis.0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定用于种植体周围黏膜炎非手术治疗的疗效
J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1305-1313. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160144. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
Five-year retrospective radiographic follow-up study of dental implants with sandblasting with large grit, and acid etching-treated surfaces.对采用大颗粒喷砂和酸蚀处理表面的牙种植体进行的五年回顾性影像学随访研究。
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;41(6):317-21. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2015.41.6.317. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
In vitro evaluation of peri-implantitis treatment modalities on Saos-2osteoblasts.种植体周围炎治疗方式对人骨肉瘤细胞系Saos-2成骨细胞的体外评估
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Sep;27(9):1085-92. doi: 10.1111/clr.12686. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: A 17-Year Follow-Up Clinical Case Report.种植体周围炎的外科治疗:一项17年随访临床病例报告
Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:574676. doi: 10.1155/2015/574676. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
Antimicrobial mouthrinse use as an adjunct method in peri-implant biofilm control.使用抗菌漱口水作为种植体周围生物膜控制的辅助方法。
Braz Oral Res. 2014;28 Spec No. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2014.vol28.0022. Epub 2014 Jul 4.
10
Prognosis and evaluation of tooth damage caused by implant fixtures.种植体固定装置所致牙齿损伤的预后与评估
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jun;39(3):144-7. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2013.39.3.144. Epub 2013 Jun 25.