• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与医院急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进计划相关的医务人员参与度和认知的影响因素:中国一项具有全国代表性的混合方法研究。

Factors Associated With Medical Staff's Engagement and Perception of a Quality Improvement Program for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Hospitals: A Nationally Representative Mixed-Methods Study in China.

机构信息

Department of Global Health Peking University School of Public Health Beijing China.

Institute for Global Health and Development Peking University Beijing China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e024845. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024845. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.024845
PMID:35352565
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9075455/
Abstract

Background Medical staff represent critical stakeholders in the process of implementing a quality improvement (QI) program. Few studies, however, have examined factors that influence medical staff engagement and perception regarding QI programs. Methods and Results We conducted a nationally representative survey of a QI program in 6 cities in China. Quantitative data were analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models, and qualitative data were analyzed using the framework method. The engagement of medical staff was significantly related to knowledge scores regarding the specific content of chest pain center accreditation (β=0.42; 95% CI, 0.27-0.57). Higher scores for inner motivation (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.18-2.72) and resource support (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.02-2.24) and lower scores for implementation barriers (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98) were associated with improved treatment behaviors among medical staff. Resource support (OR, 4.52; 95% CI, 2.99-6.84) and lower complexity (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00) had positive effects on medical staff satisfaction, and respondents with improved treatment behaviors were more satisfied with the QI program. Similar findings were found for factors that influenced medical staff's assessment of QI program sustainability. The qualitative analysis further confirmed and supplemented the findings of quantitative analysis. Conclusions Clarifying and addressing factors associated with medical staff's engagement and perception of QI programs will allow further improvements in quality of care for patients with acute coronary syndrome. These findings may also be applicable to other QI programs in China and other low- and middle-income countries. Registration URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: Chi-CTR2100043319.

摘要

背景 医务人员是实施质量改进(QI)计划过程中的关键利益相关者。然而,很少有研究探讨影响医务人员参与和感知 QI 计划的因素。

方法和结果 我们在中国 6 个城市进行了一项针对 QI 计划的全国代表性调查。使用多级混合效应线性回归模型分析定量数据,使用框架方法分析定性数据。医务人员的参与度与胸痛中心认证具体内容的知识得分显著相关(β=0.42;95%CI,0.27-0.57)。内在动机得分较高(比值比[OR],1.79;95%CI,1.18-2.72)和资源支持得分较高(OR,1.52;95%CI,1.02-2.24)以及实施障碍得分较低(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.67-0.98)与医务人员的治疗行为改善相关。资源支持(OR,4.52;95%CI,2.99-6.84)和复杂性降低(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.65-1.00)对医务人员满意度有积极影响,且治疗行为改善的受访者对 QI 计划更满意。对影响 QI 计划可持续性评估的因素的分析也得出了类似的结论。定性分析进一步证实和补充了定量分析的结果。

结论 明确和解决与医务人员参与和感知 QI 计划相关的因素,将进一步提高急性冠状动脉综合征患者的护理质量。这些发现也可能适用于中国和其他中低收入国家的其他 QI 计划。

注册网址

https://www.chictr.org.cn/;唯一标识符:Chi-CTR2100043319。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/a4b07ecd9b48/JAH3-11-e024845-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/3be2df683b90/JAH3-11-e024845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/cb3ddf6c43db/JAH3-11-e024845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/a4b07ecd9b48/JAH3-11-e024845-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/3be2df683b90/JAH3-11-e024845-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/cb3ddf6c43db/JAH3-11-e024845-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af03/9075455/a4b07ecd9b48/JAH3-11-e024845-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Associated With Medical Staff's Engagement and Perception of a Quality Improvement Program for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Hospitals: A Nationally Representative Mixed-Methods Study in China.与医院急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进计划相关的医务人员参与度和认知的影响因素:中国一项具有全国代表性的混合方法研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e024845. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024845. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Barriers and enablers in the implementation of a quality improvement program for acute coronary syndromes in hospitals: a qualitative analysis using the consolidated framework for implementation research.医院实施急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进计划的障碍和促进因素:应用实施研究综合框架的定性分析。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jun 1;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01207-6.
3
System barriers to the evidence-based care of acute coronary syndrome patients in China: qualitative analysis.中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者循证护理的系统障碍:定性分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Mar;7(2):209-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000527. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
4
Hospital quality improvement initiative for patients with acute coronary syndromes in China: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者医院质量改进倡议:一项整群随机对照试验
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Mar;7(2):217-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000526. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
5
Cluster-randomized trial to evaluate the effects of a quality improvement program on management of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The European Quality Improvement Programme for Acute Coronary Syndromes (EQUIP-ACS).评价质量改进项目对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征管理影响的整群随机试验:急性冠状动脉综合征的欧洲质量改进项目(EQUIP-ACS)。
Am Heart J. 2011 Oct;162(4):700-707.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.027.
6
Quality improvement in hospitals: barriers and facilitators.医院质量改进:障碍与促进因素
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Feb 13;30(1):16-24. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-12-2015-0144.
7
Treatment and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes in women: An analysis of a multicenter quality improvement Chinese study.女性急性冠状动脉综合征的治疗与结局:一项中国多中心质量改进研究的分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;241:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.03.090. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
8
An Economic Evaluation of the All New Zealand Acute Coronary Syndrome Quality Improvement Registry Program (ANZACS-QI 28).新西兰急性冠状动脉综合征质量改进登记研究计划(ANZACS-QI 28)的经济学评价。
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jul;29(7):1046-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2019.08.012. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
9
Hospital-Based Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.基于医院的急性冠状动脉综合征患者质量改进干预措施:一项系统评价。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005513. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
CONNECT for quality: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial to improve fall prevention in nursing homes.CONNECT 提高养老院质量:改善养老院跌倒预防的集群随机对照试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Feb 29;7:11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-11.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Care Quality Improvement for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study Based on Propensity-Score Matching Analysis.基于倾向评分匹配分析的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死医疗质量改进的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 4;18(11):6045. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18116045.
2
Assessment of Studies of Quality Improvement Strategies to Enhance Outcomes in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease.评估改善策略对心血管疾病患者结局影响的研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jun 1;4(6):e2113375. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.13375.
3
Effectiveness of chest pain centre accreditation on the management of acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective study using a national database.
胸痛中心认证对急性冠状动脉综合征管理的效果:使用国家数据库的回顾性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Nov;30(11):867-875. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011491. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
4
Geographic Variation in Process and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction in China From 2001 to 2015.中国 2001 年至 2015 年急性心肌梗死患者的治疗过程和结局的地域差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2021182. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21182.
5
Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement.用于质量改进的“系统思维”原则的发展与应用。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714.
6
Chest Pain Center Accreditation Is Associated With Improved In-Hospital Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients in China: Findings From the CCC-ACS Project.胸痛中心认证与中国急性心肌梗死患者住院结局的改善相关:来自 CCC-ACS 项目的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013384. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013384. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
7
Hospital-Based Quality Improvement Interventions for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.基于医院的急性冠状动脉综合征患者质量改进干预措施:一项系统评价。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Sep;12(9):e005513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005513. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution.可持续发展目标时代的高质量卫生系统:是时候进行一场变革了。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Nov;6(11):e1196-e1252. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
9
Hospital accreditation: staff experiences and perceptions.医院评审:员工的经历与看法
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Jun 11;31(5):420-427. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0115.
10
Building motivation to participate in a quality improvement collaborative in NHS hospital trusts in Southeast England: a qualitative participatory evaluation.激发英格兰东南部国民健康服务体系(NHS)医院信托机构参与质量改进协作的积极性:一项质性参与式评估
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e020930. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020930.