• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于质量改进的“系统思维”原则的发展与应用。

Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement.

作者信息

McNab Duncan, McKay John, Shorrock Steven, Luty Sarah, Bowie Paul

机构信息

Medical Directorate, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714
PMID:32209593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7103793/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

'Systems thinking' is often recommended in healthcare to support quality and safety activities but a shared understanding of this concept and purposeful guidance on its application are limited. Healthcare systems have been described as complex where human adaptation to localised circumstances is often necessary to achieve success. Principles for managing and improving system safety developed by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL; a European intergovernmental air navigation organisation) incorporate a 'Safety-II systems approach' to promote understanding of how safety may be achieved in complex work systems. We aimed to adapt and contextualise the core principles of this systems approach and demonstrate the application in a healthcare setting.

METHODS

The original EUROCONTROL principles were adapted using consensus-building methods with front-line staff and national safety leaders.

RESULTS

Six interrelated principles for healthcare were agreed. The foundation concept acknowledges that 'most healthcare problems and solutions belong to the system'. Principle 1 outlines the need to seek multiple perspectives to understand system safety. Principle 2 prompts us to consider the influence of prevailing work conditions-demand, capacity, resources and constraints. Principle 3 stresses the importance of analysing interactions and work flow within the system. Principle 4 encourages us to attempt to understand why professional decisions made sense at the time and principle 5 prompts us to explore everyday work including the adjustments made to achieve success in changing system conditions.A case study is used to demonstrate the application in an analysis of a system and in the subsequent improvement intervention design.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the adapted principles underpins, and is characteristic of, a holistic systems approach and may aid care team and organisational system understanding and improvement.

摘要

引言

医疗保健领域常推荐采用“系统思维”来支持质量与安全活动,但对这一概念的共同理解以及关于其应用的针对性指导却很有限。医疗系统被描述为复杂系统,在其中,人们往往需要根据当地情况进行调整才能取得成功。欧洲航空安全组织(EUROCONTROL;一个欧洲政府间航空导航组织)制定的管理和改进系统安全的原则纳入了“安全-II系统方法”,以促进对如何在复杂工作系统中实现安全的理解。我们旨在调整并结合该系统方法的核心原则,并展示其在医疗环境中的应用。

方法

采用与一线工作人员和国家安全领导人达成共识的方法,对EUROCONTROL的原始原则进行了调整。

结果

就医疗保健的六项相互关联的原则达成了一致。基础概念承认“大多数医疗问题和解决方案都属于系统”。原则1概述了需要从多个角度来理解系统安全。原则2促使我们考虑当前工作条件——需求、能力、资源和限制因素的影响。原则3强调分析系统内相互作用和工作流程的重要性。原则4鼓励我们尝试理解为什么当时做出的专业决策是合理的,原则5促使我们探索日常工作,包括为在不断变化的系统条件下取得成功而做出的调整。一个案例研究用于展示其在系统分析和后续改进干预设计中的应用。

结论

应用经过调整的原则是整体系统方法的基础和特点,可能有助于护理团队和组织系统的理解与改进。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9748/7103793/858a94910e89/bmjoq-2019-000714f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9748/7103793/858a94910e89/bmjoq-2019-000714f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9748/7103793/858a94910e89/bmjoq-2019-000714f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and application of 'systems thinking' principles for quality improvement.用于质量改进的“系统思维”原则的发展与应用。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Mar;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000714.
2
Preliminary adaptation of the systems thinking for everyday work cue card set in a US healthcare system: a pragmatic and participatory co-design approach.系统思维日常工作提示卡在美国医疗体系中的初步适应:实用且参与式的共同设计方法。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 May 23;13(2):e002655. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002655.
3
Embracing uncertainty, managing complexity: applying complexity thinking principles to transformation efforts in healthcare systems.拥抱不确定性,管理复杂性:将复杂性思维原则应用于医疗保健系统的变革努力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 21;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2994-0.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
Japan as the front-runner of super-aged societies: Perspectives from medicine and medical care in Japan.日本作为超老龄化社会的领跑者:来自日本医学与医疗护理的视角
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Jun;15(6):673-87. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12450. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
8
Application of systems thinking: 12-month postintervention evaluation of a complex health system intervention in Zambia: the case of the BHOMA.系统思维的应用:赞比亚一项复杂卫生系统干预措施的干预后12个月评估:以BHOMA为例
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;23(2):439-452. doi: 10.1111/jep.12354. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Using lean thinking to improve hypertension in a community health centre: a quality improvement report.运用精益思维改善社区卫生中心的高血压管理:一份质量改进报告。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Feb 8;8(1):e000373. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000373. eCollection 2019.
10
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Charting the Course Together: Municipal Top-Level Managers' Perspectives on Fostering Safe and Integrated Care for Older Adults Living at Home.共同规划路线:市政高层管理人员对促进居家老年人安全与综合护理的看法
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 19;25(3):20. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8916. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Delphi analysis of how the practice team should organise event analysis in primary care.关于基层医疗实践团队应如何组织事件分析的德尔菲分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 13;14(3):e003282. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003282.
3
Understanding the self-management experiences of people with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), their caregivers and the health care professionals who support them: Systematic review and qualitative meta-study.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to reduce readmissions: can complex adaptive system theory explain the heterogeneity in effectiveness? A systematic review.减少再入院的干预措施:复杂适应系统理论能否解释有效性的异质性?一项系统综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 26;18(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3712-7.
2
Guideline developers are not the only experts: Utilising the FRAM method in sepsis pathways.指南制定者并非唯一的专家:利用 FRAM 方法制定脓毒症路径。
BMC Med. 2018 Nov 21;16(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1212-6.
3
Participatory design of an improvement intervention for the primary care management of possible sepsis using the Functional Resonance Analysis Method.
了解射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者、其照护者以及为他们提供支持的医疗保健专业人员的自我管理体验:系统评价与定性荟萃研究。
Br J Card Nurs. 2025 Jun 2;20(6):1-30. doi: 10.12968/bjca.2024.0084.
4
Navigating complexity: a conceptual framework for simulation interventions.应对复杂性:模拟干预的概念框架
Adv Simul (Lond). 2025 Jul 6;10(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s41077-025-00366-y.
5
Applications of human factors approaches and methods to the development of teleconsultations in primary care: a systematic scoping review.人为因素方法在基层医疗远程会诊发展中的应用:一项系统的范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 5;14(3):e003023. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003023.
6
The green ICU: how to interpret green? A multiple perspective approach.绿色重症监护病房:如何解读绿色?一种多视角方法。
Crit Care. 2025 Feb 19;29(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05316-8.
7
Patient safety is our business! Staff perspectives on implementing hospital falls prevention education.患者安全是我们的职责!员工对实施医院跌倒预防教育的看法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae200.
8
The nursing practice environment and hospital sociotechnical complexity: a mixed-methods study.护理实践环境与医院社会技术复杂性:一项混合方法研究。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Dec 16;77(6):e20230315. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0315. eCollection 2024.
9
DiScO: novel rapid systems mapping to inform digital transformation of health systems.DisCo:用于为卫生系统数字化转型提供信息的新型快速系统绘图法。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 25;12:1441328. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1441328. eCollection 2024.
10
Systems thinking in, and for, public health: a call for a broader path.系统思维在公共卫生中的应用和作用:呼吁开辟更广阔的道路。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Aug 1;39(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae086.
使用功能共振分析方法参与设计改善疑似脓毒症的初级保健管理的干预措施。
BMC Med. 2018 Oct 11;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1164-x.
4
False Dawns and New Horizons in Patient Safety Research and Practice.虚假的曙光与患者安全研究和实践的新视野。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Dec 1;6(12):685-689. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.115.
5
The Challenges of Measuring, Improving, and Reporting Quality in Primary Care.基层医疗中衡量、改善及报告质量所面临的挑战。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Mar;15(2):175-182. doi: 10.1370/afm.2014.
6
Root-cause analysis: swatting at mosquitoes versus draining the swamp.根本原因分析:拍打蚊子与排干沼泽
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):350-353. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006229. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
7
What we know about designing an effective improvement intervention (but too often fail to put into practice).我们所了解的关于设计有效改进干预措施的内容(但往往未能付诸实践)。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jul;26(7):578-582. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006143. Epub 2016 Dec 16.
8
Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?我们当前的根本原因分析方法:它是否导致了我们在改善患者安全方面的失败?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 May;26(5):381-387. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005991. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
9
Understanding patient safety performance and educational needs using the 'Safety-II' approach for complex systems.运用“安全-II”方法理解复杂系统中的患者安全绩效和教育需求。
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Nov;27(6):443-450. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1246068. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
10
The problem with '5 whys'.“五个为什么”的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):671-677. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849. Epub 2016 Sep 2.