• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Crowding: A Call to Action for Effective Solutions to "Access Block".新型冠状病毒病大流行对拥挤的影响:呼吁采取有效措施解决“准入障碍”。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 16;22(4):860-870. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49611.
2
How the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic changed the patterns of healthcare utilization by geriatric patients and the crowding: a call to action for effective solutions to the access block.2019 年冠状病毒病大流行如何改变老年患者和人群的医疗利用模式:呼吁采取有效措施解决就诊障碍。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;17(2):503-514. doi: 10.1007/s11739-021-02732-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Effect of a Boarding Restriction Protocol on Emergency Department Crowding. boarding restriction protocol boarding 本意是登机、上船,restriction 是限制的意思,所以 boarding restriction 可以理解为登船/登机限制。 boarding restriction protocol 是 boarding restriction 的后置定语,翻译成登机限制协议。 boarding restriction protocol 即登机限制协议。 boarding restriction protocol on emergency department crowding. 中文翻译为:登机限制协议对急诊科拥挤的影响。
Yonsei Med J. 2022 May;63(5):470-479. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2022.63.5.470.
4
Effect of access block on emergency department crowding calculated by NEDOCS score.NEDOCS 评分计算的就诊时段阻塞对急诊拥挤的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.016. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
5
Emergency Department Volume, Severity, and Crowding Since the Onset of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.自 2019 冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,急诊科的工作量、严重程度和拥挤情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;82(6):650-660. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.07.024. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
6
Exploring overcrowding trends in an inner city emergence department in the UK before and during COVID-19 epidemic.探讨英国城市急症部门在 COVID-19 疫情前后的过度拥挤趋势。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 6;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00438-y.
7
Emergency department crowding and hospital transformation during COVID-19, a retrospective, descriptive study of a university hospital in Stockholm, Sweden.新冠疫情期间急诊科拥挤状况和医院转型:瑞典斯德哥尔摩一所大学附属医院的回顾性描述性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 28;28(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00799-6.
8
Five Level Triage vs. Four Level Triage in a Quaternary Emergency Department: National Analysis on Waiting Time, Validity, and Crowding-The CREONTE (Crowding and RE-Organization National TriagE) Study Group.四级分诊与五级分诊在四级急诊中的应用比较:全国范围内的等待时间、有效性和拥挤程度的分析——CREONTE(拥挤和再组织国家分诊研究组)研究小组。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 17;59(4):781. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040781.
9
Emergency Department Hallway Care From the Millennium to the Pandemic: A Clear and Present Danger.急诊部走廊照护:从千禧年到大流行:明显而现实的危险。
J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):565-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.07.011. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
10
Does volume or occupancy influence emergency access block? A multivariate time series analysis from a single emergency department in Sydney, Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,澳大利亚悉尼的一个单一急诊科的多变量时间序列分析:容量或占用率是否会影响紧急通道阻塞?
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Apr;33(2):343-348. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13717. Epub 2021 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma in the Emergency Department: A Comprehensive Review.急诊科创伤超声扩展聚焦评估:全面综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 15;14(10):3457. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103457.
2
A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.门诊与住院机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果比较:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Prostate Int. 2025 Mar;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
3
Pediatric head trauma algorithm for head CT decision-making in the emergency department.急诊科用于头部CT决策的小儿头部创伤算法。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Apr 10;5(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00238-x.
4
Does Calm Always Follow the Storm? A Comprehensive Temporal Analysis of Emergency Department Visits in Northern Italy Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.平静总会随风暴而来吗?对意大利北部新冠疫情前后急诊科就诊情况的全面时间分析。
Epidemiologia (Basel). 2025 Mar 1;6(1):10. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia6010010.
5
Impacts of Avoiding Emergency Department Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Heart Events.新冠疫情期间急性缺血性心脏事件患者避免前往急诊科就诊的影响
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 27;18:569-578. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S508088. eCollection 2025.
6
Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the Relationship Between Emergency Department Length of Stay and Timing of First Laboratory Orders.急诊科住院时间与首次实验室检查医嘱时间关系的回顾性队列分析
Cureus. 2024 Sep 8;16(9):e68966. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68966. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Activity, triage levels and impact of the pandemic on hospital emergency departments: A multicentre cross-sectional study.疫情对医院急诊科的活动、分诊级别及影响:一项多中心横断面研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Mar;81(3):1332-1342. doi: 10.1111/jan.16332. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
8
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: From Occupational Health to Emergency Medicine.一氧化碳中毒:从职业健康到急诊医学
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 23;13(9):2466. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092466.
9
Rapid triage and transfer system for patients with proven Covid-19 at emergency department.急诊科确诊新冠患者的快速分诊和转运系统。
J Appl Biomed. 2024 Mar;22(1):59-65. doi: 10.32725/jab.2024.006. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
10
Geriatric Population Triage: The Risk of Real-Life Over- and Under-Triage in an Overcrowded ED: 4- and 5-Level Triage Systems Compared: The CREONTE (Crowding and R E Organization National TriagE) Study.老年人群体分诊:在拥挤的急诊科中现实生活中过度分诊和分诊不足的风险:4级和5级分诊系统比较:CREONTE(拥挤与重新组织国家分诊)研究
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 9;14(2):195. doi: 10.3390/jpm14020195.

本文引用的文献

1
Preparing for the Maximum Emergency with a Simulation: A Table-Top Test to Evaluate Bed Surge Capacity and Staff Compliance with Training.通过模拟为最大紧急情况做准备:一项评估床位激增能力和工作人员培训合规性的桌面测试。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 16;12:377-387. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S267069. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of ED Organization with a Holding Area and a Dedicated Team on the Adherence to International Guidelines for Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Experience of an Emergency Department Organized in Areas of Intensity of Care.设有滞留区和专门团队的急诊科组织模式对急性肺栓塞患者遵循国际指南的影响:重症监护分区设置的急诊科经验
Medicines (Basel). 2020 Sep 24;7(10):60. doi: 10.3390/medicines7100060.
3
Mild head trauma in elderly patients: experience of an emergency department.老年患者的轻度头部创伤:急诊科的经验
Heliyon. 2020 Jul 7;6(7):e04226. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04226. eCollection 2020 Jul.
4
Rates of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Mild Head Trauma Patients Presenting to Emergency Department and Their Management: A Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drugs with Vitamin K Antagonists.轻头部创伤患者就诊于急诊科的颅内出血率及其管理:直接口服抗凝药物与维生素 K 拮抗剂的比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jun 23;56(6):308. doi: 10.3390/medicina56060308.
5
Role of a Brief Intensive Observation Area with a Dedicated Team of Doctors in the Management of Acute Heart Failure Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study.简短强化观察区和医生专职团队在急性心力衰竭患者管理中的作用:一项回顾性观察研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 May 21;56(5):251. doi: 10.3390/medicina56050251.
6
Collateral damage of COVID-19 pandemic: Delayed medical care.新冠疫情的附带损害:医疗护理延误。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jun;35(6):1345-1347. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14638. Epub 2020 May 17.
7
Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on outcome of myocardial infarction in Hong Kong, China.新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)疫情对中国香港地区心肌梗死结局的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 1;97(2):E194-E197. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28943. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Trauma Coagulopathy and Its Outcomes.创伤性凝血病及其结局。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 24;56(4):205. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040205.
9
Association between boarding in the emergency department and in-hospital mortality: A systematic review.急诊科留观与院内病死率的关系:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 15;15(4):e0231253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231253. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak on ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong, China.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情对中国香港ST段抬高型心肌梗死治疗的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Apr;13(4):e006631. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.120.006631. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

新型冠状病毒病大流行对拥挤的影响:呼吁采取有效措施解决“准入障碍”。

Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Crowding: A Call to Action for Effective Solutions to "Access Block".

机构信息

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Department of Emergency Medicine, Pavia, Italy.

University of Pavia, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 16;22(4):860-870. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49611.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2021.2.49611
PMID:35354013
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8328174/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare patterns change during disease outbreaks and pandemics. Identification of modified patterns is important for future preparedness and response. Emergency department (ED) crowding can occur because of the volume of patients waiting to be seen, which results in delays in patient assessment or treatment and impediments to leaving the ED once treatment is complete. Therefore, ED crowding has become a growing problem worldwide and represents a serious barrier to healthcare operations.

METHODS

This observational study was based on a retrospective review of the epidemiologic and clinical records of patients who presented to the Foundation IRCCS Policlinic San Matteo in Pavia, Italy, during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak (February 21-May 1, 2020, pandemic group). The methods involved an estimation of the changes in epidemiologic and clinical data from the annual baseline data after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

We identified reduced ED visits (180 per day in the control period vs 96 per day in the pandemic period; P < 0.001) during the COVID-19 pandemic, irrespective of age and gender, especially for low-acuity conditions. However, patients who did present to the ED were more likely to be hemodynamically unstable, exhibit abnormal vital signs, and more frequently required high-intensity care and hospitalization. During the pandemic, ED crowding dramatically increased primarily because of an increased number of visits by patients with high-acuity conditions, changes in patient management that prolonged length of stay, and increased rates of boarding, which led to the inability of patients to gain access to appropriate hospital beds within a reasonable amount of time. During the pandemic, all crowding output indices increased, especially the rates of boarding (36% vs 57%; P < 0.001), "access block" (24% vs 47%; P < 0.001), mean boarding time (640 vs 1,150 minutes [min]; P 0.001), mean "access block" time (718 vs 1,223 min; P < 0.001), and "access block" total time (650,379 vs 1,359,172 min; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Crowding in the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic was due to the inability to access hospital beds. Therefore, solutions to this lack of access are required to prevent a recurrence of crowding due to a new viral wave or epidemic.

摘要

简介

在疾病爆发和大流行期间,医疗模式会发生变化。识别这些变化对于未来的准备和应对非常重要。由于待诊患者数量过多,急诊部(ED)可能会出现拥挤现象,这会导致患者评估或治疗延迟,以及完成治疗后离开 ED 受到阻碍。因此,ED 拥挤已成为全球日益严重的问题,代表着医疗运营的严重障碍。

方法

本观察性研究基于意大利帕维亚圣马泰奥基金会 IRCCS 教学医院在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)爆发期间(2020 年 2 月 21 日至 5 月 1 日,大流行组)的回顾性回顾性分析。该方法包括在 COVID-19 大流行开始后,根据年度基线数据估算流行病学和临床数据的变化。

结果

我们发现 COVID-19 大流行期间 ED 就诊量减少(对照期每天 180 次就诊,大流行期每天 96 次就诊;P<0.001),无论年龄和性别如何,尤其是对于低危疾病。然而,确实前往 ED 的患者更有可能出现血流动力学不稳定、生命体征异常,并且更频繁地需要高强度护理和住院治疗。在大流行期间,ED 拥挤情况急剧增加,主要是因为高病情患者就诊人数增加、患者管理方式改变导致住院时间延长以及住院率增加,导致患者无法在合理时间内获得合适的病床。在大流行期间,所有拥挤输出指标均增加,尤其是住院率(36%比 57%;P<0.001)、“准入阻塞”(24%比 47%;P<0.001)、平均住院时间(640 分钟比 1150 分钟[min];P<0.001)、“准入阻塞”时间(718 分钟比 1223 分钟;P<0.001)和“准入阻塞”总时间(650379 分钟比 1359172 分钟;P<0.001)。

结论

COVID-19 大流行期间 ED 拥挤是由于无法获得病床所致。因此,需要解决这种缺乏准入的问题,以防止由于新的病毒波或流行再次出现拥挤。