Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-579-15 Mikajima, Tokorozawa, Saitama, 359-1192, Japan.
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):626. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12971-x.
Although the negative relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) or muscular fitness and diabetes mellitus were respectively observed in many previous studies, there is still a lack of studies that include CRF and muscular fitness simultaneously. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the combination of CRF and muscular fitness and diabetes through a cross-sectional study. METHODS: This study was part of WASEDA'S Health Study, a cohort study launched in 2014. We used a part of the baseline data collected for this study. Maximal exercise test using a cycle ergometer and leg extension power (LEP) test were respectively used to evaluate CRF and muscular fitness. Since LEP is affected by body weight, relative LEP (rLEP) which is LEP per body weight, was used as an index of muscular fitness. 796 men (56.5 ± 10.4 years old) who completed a medical examination and fitness tests, were divided into two groups based on CRF and rLEP, respectively. The prevalence of diabetes was collected based on a self-reported questionnaire or blood test. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the prevalence of diabetes were obtained using logistic regression models while adjusting for age, body mass index, exercise habits, family history of diabetes, smoking habits, and drinking habits.
55 (7%) participants had diabetes. Compared to participants with lower CRF or rLEP, the odds ratio (95% CIs) of diabetes in those with higher CRF or rLEP was 0.46 (0.21-0.98) or 0.34 (0.16-0.74), respectively. Furthermore, using the lower CRF and lower rLEP group as the reference, the odds ratio (95% CIs) for the lower CRF and higher rLEP group was 0.32 (0.12-0.88), and higher CRF and higher rLEP group was 0.21 (0.07-0.63), after adjusting for potential confounding factors.
CRF and rLEP have independent and joint inverse associations with diabetes prevalence. In addition, participants with high CRF and high rLEP had a lower prevalence of diabetes compared to those with only high CRF or only high rLEP.
尽管许多先前的研究分别观察到心肺功能(CRF)或肌肉力量与糖尿病之间的负相关关系,但仍缺乏同时包括 CRF 和肌肉力量的研究。因此,本研究旨在通过横断面研究探讨 CRF 和肌肉力量的组合与糖尿病之间的关系。
本研究是 WASEDA'S Health Study 的一部分,这是一项于 2014 年启动的队列研究。我们使用了为此研究收集的一部分基线数据。使用自行车测力计进行最大运动测试和腿部伸展力量(LEP)测试,分别评估 CRF 和肌肉力量。由于 LEP 受体重影响,因此使用相对 LEP(rLEP),即 LEP 与体重的比值,作为肌肉力量的指标。完成体检和体能测试的 796 名男性(56.5±10.4 岁),根据 CRF 和 rLEP 分别分为两组。糖尿病的患病率是根据自我报告的问卷或血液测试收集的。使用逻辑回归模型调整年龄、体重指数、运动习惯、糖尿病家族史、吸烟习惯和饮酒习惯后,获得糖尿病患病率的优势比(95%置信区间)。
55 名(7%)参与者患有糖尿病。与 CRF 或 rLEP 较低的参与者相比,CRF 或 rLEP 较高的参与者中糖尿病的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为 0.46(0.21-0.98)或 0.34(0.16-0.74)。此外,以 CRF 和 rLEP 较低的组为参考,CRF 和 rLEP 较低的组的优势比(95%置信区间)为 0.32(0.12-0.88),CRF 和 rLEP 较高的组为 0.21(0.07-0.63),在调整潜在混杂因素后。
CRF 和 rLEP 与糖尿病患病率呈独立和联合负相关。此外,与仅具有高 CRF 或仅具有高 rLEP 的参与者相比,具有高 CRF 和高 rLEP 的参与者的糖尿病患病率较低。