Suppr超能文献

分级运动想象疗法对肩周炎患者的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。

Effectiveness of graded motor imagery in subjects with frozen shoulder: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Gurudut Peeyoosha, Godse Apurva Nitin

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Physiotherapy, KAHER Institute of Physiotherapy, Belagavi, India.

出版信息

Korean J Pain. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):152-159. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.152.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subjects with frozen shoulder (FS) might not be comfortable with vigorous physical therapy. Clinical trials assessing the effect of graded motor imagery (GMI) in FS are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of GMI as an adjunct to conventional physiotherapy in individuals with painful FS.

METHODS

Twenty subjects aged 40-65 years having stage I and II of FS were randomly divided into two study groups. The conventional physiotherapy group (n = 10) received electrotherapy and exercises while the GMI group (n = 10) received GMI along with the conventional physiotherapy thrice a week for 3 weeks. Pre- (Session 1) and post- (Session 9) intervention analysis for flexion, abduction, and external rotation range of motion (ROM) using a universal goniometer, fear of movement using the fear avoidance belief questionnaire (FABQ), pain with the visual analogue scale, and functional disability using the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) was done by a blinded assessor.

RESULTS

Statistically significant difference was seen within both the groups for all the outcomes. In terms of increasing abduction ROM as well as reducing fear of movement, pain, and functional disability, the GMI group was significantly better than control group. However, both groups were equally effective for improving flexion and external rotation ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of GMI to the conventional physiotherapy proved to be superior to conventional physiotherapy alone in terms of reducing pain, kinesiophobia, and improving shoulder function for stage I and II of FS.

摘要

背景

肩周炎(FS)患者可能无法耐受剧烈的物理治疗。目前缺乏评估分级运动想象(GMI)对肩周炎疗效的临床试验。本研究旨在确定GMI作为辅助手段联合传统物理治疗对疼痛性肩周炎患者的效果。

方法

将20例年龄在40 - 65岁、处于肩周炎I期和II期的患者随机分为两个研究组。传统物理治疗组(n = 10)接受电疗和运动训练,而GMI组(n = 10)在接受传统物理治疗的同时,每周进行3次GMI训练,共3周。由一位盲法评估者使用通用角度计对干预前(第1次治疗)和干预后(第9次治疗)的屈曲、外展和外旋活动范围(ROM)进行分析,使用恐惧回避信念问卷(FABQ)评估运动恐惧,使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛,使用肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)评估功能障碍。

结果

两组在所有结果指标上均有统计学显著差异。在增加外展ROM以及减少运动恐惧、疼痛和功能障碍方面,GMI组明显优于对照组。然而,两组在改善屈曲和外旋ROM方面效果相当。

结论

在肩周炎I期和II期患者中,在传统物理治疗基础上增加GMI在减轻疼痛、运动恐惧和改善肩部功能方面优于单纯传统物理治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e13/8977197/e2c0a49956ce/kjp-35-2-152-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验