Institute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey; Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Division of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Bandırma Onyedi Eylul University, Balıkesir, Turkey.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Oct;31(10):2147-2156. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.031. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
Physiotherapy improves the movement range after the onset of post-traumatic elbow stiffness and reduces the pain, which is a factor limiting elbow range of motion. However, no results have been reported for motor-cognitive intervention programs in post-traumatic elbow stiffness management. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of graded motor imagery (GMI) in post-traumatic elbow stiffness.
Fifty patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness (18 female; mean age, 41.9 ± 10.9 years) were divided into 2 groups. The GMI group (n = 25) received a program consisting of left-right discrimination, motor imagery, and mirror therapy (twice a week for 6 weeks); the structured exercise (SE) group (n = 25) received a program consisting of range-of-motion, stretching, and strengthening exercises (twice a week for 6 weeks). Both groups received a 6-week home exercise program. The primary outcome was the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The secondary outcomes were the active range of motion (AROM), visual analog scale (VAS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), muscle strength of elbow flexors and extensors, grip strength, left-right discrimination, and Global Rating of Change. Patients were assessed at baseline, at the end of treatment (12 sessions), and a 6-week follow-up.
The results indicated that both GMI and SE interventions significantly improved outcomes (P < .05). After a 6-week intervention, the DASH score was significantly improved with a medium effect size in the GMI group compared with the SE group, and improvement continued at the 6-week follow-up (F = 3.10, P = .01). The results with a medium to large effect size were also significant for elbow flexion AROM (P = .02), elbow extension AROM (P = .03), VAS-activity (P = .001), TSK (P = .01), and muscle strength of elbow flexors and elbow extensors (P = .03) in favor of the GMI group.
The GMI is an effective motor-cognitive intervention program that might be applied to the rehabilitation of post-traumatic elbow stiffness to improve function, elbow AROM, pain, fear of movement-related pain, and muscle strength.
物理治疗可改善创伤后肘部僵硬发作后的运动范围,并减轻疼痛,而疼痛是限制肘部运动范围的一个因素。然而,在创伤后肘部僵硬的管理中,尚未有运动认知干预方案的结果报告。本研究的目的是探讨分级运动想象(GMI)在创伤后肘部僵硬中的疗效。
50 例创伤后肘部僵硬患者(18 名女性;平均年龄,41.9±10.9 岁)分为 2 组。GMI 组(n=25)接受了一项包括左右辨别、运动想象和镜像治疗的方案(每周 2 次,共 6 周);结构运动(SE)组(n=25)接受了一项包括活动范围、伸展和强化运动的方案(每周 2 次,共 6 周)。两组患者均接受了为期 6 周的家庭运动方案。主要结局指标为上肢残疾问卷(DASH)。次要结局指标为主动活动范围(AROM)、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、坦帕运动恐惧量表(TSK)、肘屈肌和伸肌的肌肉力量、握力、左右辨别和总体变化评级。患者在基线、治疗结束时(12 次治疗后)和 6 周随访时进行评估。
结果表明,GMI 和 SE 干预均显著改善了结局(P<.05)。在 6 周干预后,GMI 组的 DASH 评分显著改善,与 SE 组相比具有中等效应量,并且在 6 周随访时仍持续改善(F=3.10,P=.01)。对于肘屈肌 AROM(P=.02)、肘伸肌 AROM(P=.03)、VAS-活动(P=.001)、TSK(P=.01)和肘屈肌和肘伸肌的肌肉力量(P=.03),GMI 组也具有显著的中到大效应量的结果。
GMI 是一种有效的运动认知干预方案,可应用于创伤后肘部僵硬的康复,以改善功能、肘部 AROM、疼痛、对运动相关疼痛的恐惧和肌肉力量。