Suppr超能文献

产科护理在线评论中的患者体验与满意度:观察性研究

Patient Experience and Satisfaction in Online Reviews of Obstetric Care: Observational Study.

作者信息

Seltzer Emily K, Guntuku Sharath Chandra, Lanza Amy L, Tufts Christopher, Srinivas Sindhu K, Klinger Elissa V, Asch David A, Fausti Nick, Ungar Lyle H, Merchant Raina M

机构信息

Penn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 31;6(3):e28379. doi: 10.2196/28379.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality of care in labor and delivery is traditionally measured through the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems but less is known about the experiences of care reported by patients and caregivers on online sites that are more easily accessed by the public.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to generate insight into the labor and delivery experience using hospital reviews on Yelp.

METHODS

We identified all Yelp reviews of US hospitals posted online from May 2005 to March 2017. We used a machine learning tool, latent Dirichlet allocation, to identify 100 topics or themes within these reviews and used Pearson r to identify statistically significant correlations between topics and high (5-star) and low (1-star) ratings.

RESULTS

A total of 1569 hospitals listed in the American Hospital Association directory had at least one Yelp posting, contributing a total of 41,095 Yelp reviews. Among those hospitals, 919 (59%) had at least one Yelp rating for labor and delivery services (median of 9 reviews), contributing a total of 6523 labor and delivery reviews. Reviews concentrated among 5-star (n=2643, 41%) and 1-star reviews (n=1934, 30%). Themes strongly associated with favorable ratings included the following: top-notch care (r=0.45, P<.001), describing staff as comforting (r=0.52, P<.001), the delivery experience (r=0.46, P<.001), modern and clean facilities (r=0.44, P<.001), and hospital food (r=0.38, P<.001). Themes strongly correlated with 1-star labor and delivery reviews included complaints to management (r=0.30, P<.001), a lack of agency among patients (r=0.47, P<.001), and issues with discharging from the hospital (r=0.32, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Online review content about labor and delivery can provide meaningful information about patient satisfaction and experiences. Narratives from these reviews that are not otherwise captured in traditional surveys can direct efforts to improve the experience of obstetrical care.

摘要

背景

传统上,分娩护理质量是通过医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估来衡量的,但对于患者和护理人员在公众更容易访问的在线网站上报告的护理体验,我们了解得较少。

目的

本研究的目的是通过Yelp上的医院评论来深入了解分娩体验。

方法

我们识别了2005年5月至2017年3月期间在美国在线发布的所有Yelp对美国医院的评论。我们使用一种机器学习工具——潜在狄利克雷分配,在这些评论中识别出100个主题,并使用皮尔逊相关系数r来识别主题与高评分(5星)和低评分(1星)之间的统计显著相关性。

结果

美国医院协会目录中列出的1569家医院至少有一条Yelp帖子,总共贡献了41095条Yelp评论。在这些医院中,919家(59%)至少有一条关于分娩服务的Yelp评分(中位数为9条评论),总共贡献了6523条分娩评论。评论集中在5星(n = 2643,41%)和1星评论(n = 1934,30%)。与好评密切相关的主题包括:一流的护理(r = 0.45,P <.001)、形容工作人员令人安心(r = 0.52,P <.001)、分娩体验(r = 0.46,P <.001)、现代化且干净的设施(r = 0.44,P <.001)以及医院食物(r = 0.38,P <.001)。与1星分娩评论密切相关的主题包括向管理层投诉(r = 0.30,P <.001)、患者缺乏自主性(r = 0.47,P <.001)以及出院问题(r = 0.32,P <.001)。

结论

关于分娩的在线评论内容可以提供有关患者满意度和体验的有意义信息。这些评论中的叙述在传统调查中未被其他方式捕捉到,可以指导努力改善产科护理体验。

相似文献

3
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
5
Crowd-sourced hospital ratings are correlated with patient satisfaction but not surgical safety.
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):764-768. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Describing the patient experience from Yelp reviews of community pharmacies.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):349-355. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):619-624. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Online Reviews of Mental Health Treatment Facilities: Narrative Themes Associated With Positive and Negative Ratings.
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):776-783. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000267. Epub 2021 May 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
"Told": the Word Most Correlated to Negative Online Hospital Reviews.
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1079-1080. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04870-6.
2
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
Analytical Insights from Patient Narratives: The Next Step for Better Patient Experience.
J Patient Exp. 2014 May;1(1):20-22. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100105. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-Rating Websites.
JAMA. 2017 Feb 21;317(7):766-768. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18553.
5
Transparency and Trust - Online Patient Reviews of Physicians.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):197-199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1610136.
6
Learning by Listening-Improving Health Care in the Era of Yelp.
JAMA. 2016 Dec 20;316(23):2483-2484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16754.
8
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
9
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):675-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验