• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient Experience and Satisfaction in Online Reviews of Obstetric Care: Observational Study.产科护理在线评论中的患者体验与满意度:观察性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 31;6(3):e28379. doi: 10.2196/28379.
2
Online Reviews of Specialized Drug Treatment Facilities-Identifying Potential Drivers of High and Low Patient Satisfaction.专业药物治疗机构的在线评价——确定患者高满意度和低满意度的潜在驱动因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jun;35(6):1647-1653. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05548-9.
3
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.在线患者体验评分:急诊科与紧急护理中心。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
5
Crowd-sourced hospital ratings are correlated with patient satisfaction but not surgical safety.众包医院评级与患者满意度相关,但与手术安全性无关。
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):764-768. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 20.
6
Association Between Online Reviews of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities and Drug-Induced Mortality Rates: Cross-Sectional Analysis.物质使用障碍治疗机构的在线评论与药物所致死亡率之间的关联:横断面分析
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 29;2:e46317. doi: 10.2196/46317.
7
Describing the patient experience from Yelp reviews of community pharmacies.描述社区药店 Yelp 评论中的患者体验。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019 May-Jun;59(3):349-355. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings.评级游戏:对养老院比较和 Yelp 评级的分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Aug;27(8):619-624. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
Online Reviews of Mental Health Treatment Facilities: Narrative Themes Associated With Positive and Negative Ratings.心理健康治疗机构的在线评论:与正面和负面评价相关的叙事主题。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):776-783. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000267. Epub 2021 May 21.
10
Online Reviews as Health Data: Examining the Association Between Availability of Health Care Services and Patient Star Ratings Exemplified by the Yelp Academic Dataset.作为健康数据的在线评论:以Yelp学术数据集为例研究医疗保健服务可及性与患者星级评分之间的关联
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Jul 12;3(3):e43. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.7001.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities by Race and Urbanicity in Online Health Care Facility Reviews.在线医疗设施评价中的种族和城市化差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446890. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890.
2
Investigating Patient Satisfaction Through Web-Based Reviews of Norwegian Dentists: Quantitative Study Using the Meaning Extraction Method.通过对挪威牙医的在线评价调查患者满意度:使用意义提取法的定量研究
J Particip Med. 2024 May 3;16:e49262. doi: 10.2196/49262.
3
Year 2022 in Medical Natural Language Processing: Availability of Language Models as a Step in the Democratization of NLP in the Biomedical Area.2022 年医学自然语言处理:语言模型的可用性是生物医学领域 NLP 民主化的一步。
Yearb Med Inform. 2023 Aug;32(1):244-252. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768752. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
4
The Use of Web-Based Patient Reviews to Assess Medical Oncologists' Competency: Mixed Methods Sequential Explanatory Study.利用基于网络的患者评价评估肿瘤内科医生的能力:混合方法序列解释性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 4;7:e39857. doi: 10.2196/39857.
5
COVID-19 contact tracing app reviews reveal concerns and motivations around adoption.新冠接触者追踪应用程序评估揭示了人们对采用该应用程序的担忧和动机。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273222. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
"Told": the Word Most Correlated to Negative Online Hospital Reviews.“告知”:与负面在线医院评价关联度最高的词汇。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jul;34(7):1079-1080. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04870-6.
2
Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.在线患者体验评分:急诊科与紧急护理中心。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):631-638. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
3
Analytical Insights from Patient Narratives: The Next Step for Better Patient Experience.患者叙述中的分析见解:提升患者体验的下一步
J Patient Exp. 2014 May;1(1):20-22. doi: 10.1177/237437431400100105. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-Rating Websites.商业医生评级网站的网站特性与医生评价
JAMA. 2017 Feb 21;317(7):766-768. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18553.
5
Transparency and Trust - Online Patient Reviews of Physicians.透明度与信任——医生的在线患者评价
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):197-199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1610136.
6
Learning by Listening-Improving Health Care in the Era of Yelp.倾听学习——在Yelp时代改善医疗保健
JAMA. 2016 Dec 20;316(23):2483-2484. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.16754.
7
Do Health Care Providers Use Online Patient Ratings to Improve the Quality of Care? Results From an Online-Based Cross-Sectional Study.医疗服务提供者是否利用在线患者评分来提高医疗质量?一项基于网络的横断面研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 19;18(9):e254. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5889.
8
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
9
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.来自患者护理的最密切观察者:对医院在线叙事评论的主题分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science.将患者对临床医生的叙述从轶事转化为科学。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):675-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361.

产科护理在线评论中的患者体验与满意度:观察性研究

Patient Experience and Satisfaction in Online Reviews of Obstetric Care: Observational Study.

作者信息

Seltzer Emily K, Guntuku Sharath Chandra, Lanza Amy L, Tufts Christopher, Srinivas Sindhu K, Klinger Elissa V, Asch David A, Fausti Nick, Ungar Lyle H, Merchant Raina M

机构信息

Penn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 31;6(3):e28379. doi: 10.2196/28379.

DOI:10.2196/28379
PMID:35357310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9015735/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The quality of care in labor and delivery is traditionally measured through the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems but less is known about the experiences of care reported by patients and caregivers on online sites that are more easily accessed by the public.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to generate insight into the labor and delivery experience using hospital reviews on Yelp.

METHODS

We identified all Yelp reviews of US hospitals posted online from May 2005 to March 2017. We used a machine learning tool, latent Dirichlet allocation, to identify 100 topics or themes within these reviews and used Pearson r to identify statistically significant correlations between topics and high (5-star) and low (1-star) ratings.

RESULTS

A total of 1569 hospitals listed in the American Hospital Association directory had at least one Yelp posting, contributing a total of 41,095 Yelp reviews. Among those hospitals, 919 (59%) had at least one Yelp rating for labor and delivery services (median of 9 reviews), contributing a total of 6523 labor and delivery reviews. Reviews concentrated among 5-star (n=2643, 41%) and 1-star reviews (n=1934, 30%). Themes strongly associated with favorable ratings included the following: top-notch care (r=0.45, P<.001), describing staff as comforting (r=0.52, P<.001), the delivery experience (r=0.46, P<.001), modern and clean facilities (r=0.44, P<.001), and hospital food (r=0.38, P<.001). Themes strongly correlated with 1-star labor and delivery reviews included complaints to management (r=0.30, P<.001), a lack of agency among patients (r=0.47, P<.001), and issues with discharging from the hospital (r=0.32, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Online review content about labor and delivery can provide meaningful information about patient satisfaction and experiences. Narratives from these reviews that are not otherwise captured in traditional surveys can direct efforts to improve the experience of obstetrical care.

摘要

背景

传统上,分娩护理质量是通过医院医疗服务提供者和系统消费者评估来衡量的,但对于患者和护理人员在公众更容易访问的在线网站上报告的护理体验,我们了解得较少。

目的

本研究的目的是通过Yelp上的医院评论来深入了解分娩体验。

方法

我们识别了2005年5月至2017年3月期间在美国在线发布的所有Yelp对美国医院的评论。我们使用一种机器学习工具——潜在狄利克雷分配,在这些评论中识别出100个主题,并使用皮尔逊相关系数r来识别主题与高评分(5星)和低评分(1星)之间的统计显著相关性。

结果

美国医院协会目录中列出的1569家医院至少有一条Yelp帖子,总共贡献了41095条Yelp评论。在这些医院中,919家(59%)至少有一条关于分娩服务的Yelp评分(中位数为9条评论),总共贡献了6523条分娩评论。评论集中在5星(n = 2643,41%)和1星评论(n = 1934,30%)。与好评密切相关的主题包括:一流的护理(r = 0.45,P <.001)、形容工作人员令人安心(r = 0.52,P <.001)、分娩体验(r = 0.46,P <.001)、现代化且干净的设施(r = 0.44,P <.001)以及医院食物(r = 0.38,P <.001)。与1星分娩评论密切相关的主题包括向管理层投诉(r = 0.30,P <.001)、患者缺乏自主性(r = 0.47,P <.001)以及出院问题(r = 0.32,P <.001)。

结论

关于分娩的在线评论内容可以提供有关患者满意度和体验的有意义信息。这些评论中的叙述在传统调查中未被其他方式捕捉到,可以指导努力改善产科护理体验。