相似文献
1
Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-Rating Websites.
JAMA. 2017 Feb 21;317(7):766-768. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.18553.
2
Content, Quality, and Assessment Tools of Physician-Rating Websites in 12 Countries: Quantitative Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(6):e212. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9105.
3
Doc shopping? A closer look yields a healthier choice.
US News World Rep. 2000 Aug 21;129(7):60-2.
4
[Drug administration and information dissemination via online].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2001 Oct-Dec;54(4):539-47.
5
Evaluation of internet websites about retinopathy of prematurity patient education.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 May;89(5):565-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.055111.
6
Implementation and evaluation of an internet health site for adolescents in Switzerland.
J Adolesc Health. 2003 Oct;33(4):287-90. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00181-2.
7
An evaluation of telehealth websites for design, literacy, information and content.
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):31-5. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091208. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
8
Evaluation of web accessibility of consumer health information websites.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003;2003:743-7.
9
Developments in the Frequency of Ratings and Evaluation Tendencies: A Review of German Physician Rating Websites.
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 25;19(8):e299. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6599.
10
Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):867-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.039.
引用本文的文献
1
How to detect fake online physician reviews: A deep learning approach.
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 30;10:20552076241277171. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277171. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243. eCollection 2023.
3
VA-Delivered or VA-Purchased Care: Important Factors for Veterans Navigating Care Decisions.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 May;38(7):1647-1654. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08128-0. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0278510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278510. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of Social Influence on the Intention to Use Physician Rating Websites: Moderated Mediation Analysis Using a Mixed Methods Approach.
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 14;24(11):e37505. doi: 10.2196/37505.
6
A Large Number of Reviews on Physician Rating Websites May Reflect Reputation Management.
Iowa Orthop J. 2022 Jun;42(1):283-286.
7
Patient Experience and Satisfaction in Online Reviews of Obstetric Care: Observational Study.
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 31;6(3):e28379. doi: 10.2196/28379.
8
Choosing a Provider: What Factors Matter Most to Consumers and Patients?
J Patient Exp. 2022 Jan 19;9:23743735221074175. doi: 10.1177/23743735221074175. eCollection 2022.
9
Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients' Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111226.
10
Visibility Versus Privacy of Physicians in the Age of Social Media.
Interact J Med Res. 2021 Mar 8;10(1):e21640. doi: 10.2196/21640.
本文引用的文献
1
Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):675-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361.
2
Public awareness, perception, and use of online physician rating sites.
JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):734-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.283194.
3
A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2003.
4
Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: an analysis of physician-rating websites.
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Sep;25(9):942-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0. Epub 2010 May 13.
Zotero 插件