• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。

Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.

作者信息

Ranard Benjamin L, Werner Rachel M, Antanavicius Tadas, Schwartz H Andrew, Smith Robert J, Meisel Zachary F, Asch David A, Ungar Lyle H, Merchant Raina M

机构信息

Benjamin L. Ranard is a doctor of medicine and master of science in health policy research combined-degree student at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.

Rachel M. Werner is a core investigator at the Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion and an associate professor of medicine at the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030
PMID:27044971
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4845957/
Abstract

Little is known about how real-time online rating platforms such as Yelp may complement the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey, which is the US standard for evaluating patients' experiences after hospitalization. We compared the content of Yelp narrative reviews of hospitals to the topics in the HCAHPS survey, called domains in HCAHPS terminology. While the domains included in Yelp reviews covered the majority of HCAHPS domains, Yelp reviews covered an additional twelve domains not found in HCAHPS. The majority of Yelp topics that most strongly correlate with positive or negative reviews are not measured or reported by HCAHPS. The large collection of patient- and caregiver-centered experiences found on Yelp can be analyzed with natural language processing methods, identifying for policy makers the measures of hospital quality that matter most to patients and caregivers. The Yelp measures and analysis can also provide actionable feedback for hospitals.

摘要

对于像Yelp这样的实时在线评级平台如何补充医疗服务提供者和系统的医院消费者评估(HCAHPS)调查,人们知之甚少,而HCAHPS调查是美国评估患者住院后体验的标准。我们将Yelp上医院的叙述性评论内容与HCAHPS调查中的主题(用HCAHPS术语称为领域)进行了比较。虽然Yelp评论中包含的领域涵盖了HCAHPS的大部分领域,但Yelp评论还涵盖了HCAHPS中未发现的另外十二个领域。与正面或负面评论最密切相关的大多数Yelp主题并未由HCAHPS进行衡量或报告。Yelp上大量以患者和护理人员为中心的体验可以通过自然语言处理方法进行分析,为政策制定者识别出对患者和护理人员最重要的医院质量衡量标准。Yelp的衡量标准和分析也可以为医院提供可操作的反馈。

相似文献

1
Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.Yelp上对医院护理的评价可以补充并为传统的患者护理体验调查提供信息。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1030.
2
The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA.美国商业网站评级与传统医院绩效评估指标的关系。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):194-202. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001360. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
3
Social media hospital ratings and HCAHPS survey scores.社交媒体医院评分和 HCAHPS 调查评分。
J Health Organ Manag. 2020 Feb 8;34(2):162-172. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2019-0234.
4
Patient narratives in Yelp reviews offer insight into opioid experiences and the challenges of pain management.Yelp评论中的患者叙述提供了对阿片类药物使用体验以及疼痛管理挑战的洞察。
Pain Manag. 2018 Mar 1;8(2):95-104. doi: 10.2217/pmt-2017-0050. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
5
From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals.来自患者护理的最密切观察者:对医院在线叙事评论的主题分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):889-897. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004515. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
6
Crowd-sourced hospital ratings are correlated with patient satisfaction but not surgical safety.众包医院评级与患者满意度相关,但与手术安全性无关。
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):764-768. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
What do patients say about emergency departments in online reviews? A qualitative study.患者在在线评论中如何评价急诊科?一项定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jan;25(1):14-24. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004035. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
8
The value of patients' handwritten comments on HCAHPS surveys.患者在 HCAHPS 调查中手写评论的价值。
J Healthc Manag. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):31-47.
9
Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States.美国患者对医院护理的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116.
10
Patient-related Factors and Perioperative Outcomes Are Associated with Self-Reported Hospital Rating after Spine Surgery.患者相关因素和围手术期结局与脊柱手术后的自我报告医院评分相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):643-652. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000892.

引用本文的文献

1
The Use of Natural Language Processing to Interpret Unstructured Patient Feedback on Health Services: Scoping Review.利用自然语言处理解读关于医疗服务的非结构化患者反馈:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e72853. doi: 10.2196/72853.
2
Online Reviews of Health Care Facilities.医疗保健机构的在线评论
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524505. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24505.
3
Exploring the Determinants of Patient Experiences Using the Digital Topic Modeling Approach.使用数字主题建模方法探索患者体验的决定因素。

本文引用的文献

1
Taking Patients' Narratives about Clinicians from Anecdote to Science.将患者对临床医生的叙述从轶事转化为科学。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 13;373(7):675-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1502361.
2
Identifying key hospital service quality factors in online health communities.识别在线健康社区中的关键医院服务质量因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 7;17(4):e90. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3646.
3
Hospital Evaluations by Social Media: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook Ratings among Performance Outliers.社交媒体对医院的评价:绩效异常者之间Facebook评分的比较分析。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jul 11;2025:8183250. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8183250. eCollection 2025.
4
Analyzing Patient Complaints in Web-Based Reviews of Private Hospitals in Selangor, Malaysia, Using Large Language Model-Assisted Content Analysis: Mixed Methods Study.使用大语言模型辅助内容分析法分析马来西亚雪兰莪州私立医院基于网络的评价中的患者投诉:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 27;9:e69075. doi: 10.2196/69075.
5
Disparities by Race and Urbanicity in Online Health Care Facility Reviews.在线医疗设施评价中的种族和城市化差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2446890. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46890.
6
The effect of patient satisfaction scores on physician clinical decision making: A possible factor driving utilization of opioid prescriptions, magnetic resonance imaging, and interventional spine procedures.患者满意度评分对医生临床决策的影响:可能推动阿片类药物处方、磁共振成像和脊柱介入手术使用的一个因素。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Feb 3;1(1):100012. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100012. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Classification of Patients' Judgments of Their Physicians in Web-Based Written Reviews Using Natural Language Processing: Algorithm Development and Validation.使用自然语言处理对患者在基于网络的书面评论中对其医生的评价进行分类:算法开发与验证
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 1;26:e50236. doi: 10.2196/50236.
8
Google star ratings of Canadian hospitals: a nationwide cross-sectional analysis.谷歌对加拿大医院的星级评价:一项全国性的横断面分析。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 22;13(3):e002713. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002713.
9
Association Between Online Reviews of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Facilities and Drug-Induced Mortality Rates: Cross-Sectional Analysis.物质使用障碍治疗机构的在线评论与药物所致死亡率之间的关联:横断面分析
JMIR AI. 2023 Dec 29;2:e46317. doi: 10.2196/46317.
10
Can deepfakes be used to study emotion perception? A comparison of dynamic face stimuli.深度伪造能否用于研究情绪感知?动态面部刺激的比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Oct;56(7):7674-7690. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02443-y. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1440-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3236-3. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
4
Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization.美国医院社交媒体的使用情况:采用与利用情况的描述性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 27;16(11):e264. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3758.
5
A large-scale quantitative analysis of latent factors and sentiment in online doctor reviews.在线医生评价中潜在因素与情感的大规模定量分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):1098-103. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002711. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
6
Tweets about hospital quality: a mixed methods study.关于医院质量的推文:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):838-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002875. Epub 2014 Apr 19.
7
Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach.社交媒体语言中的个性、性别和年龄:开放词汇方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e73791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073791. eCollection 2013.
8
Who chooses, who uses, who rates: the impact of agency on electronic word-of-mouth about hospitals stays.谁选择、谁使用、谁评价:代理机构对有关住院体验的电子口碑的影响。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2014 Jul-Sep;39(3):223-33. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3182993b6a.
9
A mixed-methods analysis of patient reviews of hospital care in England: implications for public reporting of health care quality data in the United States.对英国医院护理患者评价的混合方法分析:对美国医疗质量数据公开报告的启示。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Jan;39(1):7-15. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39003-5.
10
The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA.美国商业网站评级与传统医院绩效评估指标的关系。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):194-202. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001360. Epub 2012 Nov 23.