• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干旱对小麦(Triticum aestivum)叶片日呼吸的温度响应的影响大于生长温度。

Drought exerts a greater influence than growth temperature on the temperature response of leaf day respiration in wheat (Triticum aestivum).

机构信息

Department of Plant Sciences, Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

LEPSE, Institut Agro SupAgro, INRAE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Jul;45(7):2062-2077. doi: 10.1111/pce.14324. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1111/pce.14324
PMID:35357701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9324871/
Abstract

We assessed how the temperature response of leaf day respiration (R ) in wheat responded to contrasting water regimes and growth temperatures. In Experiment 1, well-watered and drought-stressed conditions were imposed on two genotypes; in Experiment 2, the two water regimes combined with high (HT), medium (MT) and low (LT) growth temperatures were imposed on one of the genotypes. R was estimated from simultaneous gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements at six leaf temperatures (T ) for each treatment, using the Yin method for nonphotorespiratory conditions and the nonrectangular hyperbolic fitting method for photorespiratory conditions. The two genotypes responded similarly to growth and measurement conditions. Estimates of R for nonphotorespiratory conditions were generally higher than those for photorespiratory conditions, but their responses to T were similar. Under well-watered conditions, R and its sensitivity to T slightly acclimated to LT, but did not acclimate to HT. Temperature sensitivities of R were considerably suppressed by drought, and the suppression varied among growth temperatures. Thus, it is necessary to quantify interactions between drought and growth temperature for reliably modelling R under climate change. Our study also demonstrated that the Kok method, one of the currently popular methods for estimating R , underestimated R significantly.

摘要

我们评估了小麦叶片日间呼吸作用(R)对不同水分条件和生长温度的温度响应。在实验 1 中,对两个基因型施加充分浇水和干旱胁迫条件;在实验 2 中,对其中一个基因型施加两种水分条件,并结合高(HT)、中(MT)和低(LT)生长温度。使用 Yin 法(非光呼吸条件下)和非矩形双曲线拟合法(光呼吸条件下),在每个处理的六个叶片温度(T)下,通过同时进行气体交换和叶绿素荧光测量来估算 R。两个基因型对生长和测量条件的响应相似。非光呼吸条件下的 R 估算值通常高于光呼吸条件下的估算值,但它们对 T 的响应相似。在充分浇水条件下,R 及其对 LT 的敏感性略有适应,但对 HT 没有适应。干旱严重抑制了 R 的温度敏感性,并且这种抑制在不同的生长温度下有所不同。因此,为了在气候变化下可靠地模拟 R,有必要量化干旱和生长温度之间的相互作用。我们的研究还表明,目前流行的估算 R 的方法之一——Kok 法,显著低估了 R。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/e4798a8c4bd0/PCE-45-2062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/0066e82c3a0e/PCE-45-2062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/676da6975fb7/PCE-45-2062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/20e34c22a5f9/PCE-45-2062-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/d48acd15c925/PCE-45-2062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/e4798a8c4bd0/PCE-45-2062-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/0066e82c3a0e/PCE-45-2062-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/676da6975fb7/PCE-45-2062-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/20e34c22a5f9/PCE-45-2062-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/d48acd15c925/PCE-45-2062-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79c/9324871/e4798a8c4bd0/PCE-45-2062-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Drought exerts a greater influence than growth temperature on the temperature response of leaf day respiration in wheat (Triticum aestivum).干旱对小麦(Triticum aestivum)叶片日呼吸的温度响应的影响大于生长温度。
Plant Cell Environ. 2022 Jul;45(7):2062-2077. doi: 10.1111/pce.14324. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat.忽视干旱下光合作用的驯化会导致预测小麦叶片光合作用时产生显著误差。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jan;29(2):505-521. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16488. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
3
Evaluation of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes for drought tolerance using morpho-physiological traits under drought-stressed and well-watered conditions.评价小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)基因型在干旱胁迫和充分供水条件下的形态生理特性对干旱的耐受性。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0283347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283347. eCollection 2023.
4
Genotypic variation in drought stress response and subsequent recovery of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)干旱胁迫响应及其后续恢复的基因型变异。
J Plant Res. 2011 Jan;124(1):147-54. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0340-7. Epub 2010 May 26.
5
Using a reaction-diffusion model to estimate day respiration and reassimilation of (photo)respired CO in leaves.利用反应扩散模型估算叶片中(光)呼吸 CO2 的日呼吸和再同化。
New Phytol. 2019 Jul;223(2):619-631. doi: 10.1111/nph.15857. Epub 2019 May 11.
6
Pre-drought priming sustains grain development under post-anthesis drought stress by regulating the growth hormones in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).预旱处理通过调节冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)中的生长激素来维持花后干旱胁迫下的籽粒发育。
Planta. 2017 Sep;246(3):509-524. doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2698-4. Epub 2017 May 19.
7
Growth and Photosynthetic Activity of Selected Spelt Varieties ( ssp. L.) Cultivated under Drought Conditions with Different Endophytic Core Microbiomes.在不同内生核心微生物组条件下干旱胁迫对选定斯佩尔特小麦品种(ssp. L.)生长和光合作用的影响。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 27;21(21):7987. doi: 10.3390/ijms21217987.
8
Variety-specific response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leaf mitochondria to drought stress.小麦叶片线粒体对干旱胁迫的品种特异性响应。
J Plant Res. 2009 Jul;122(4):445-54. doi: 10.1007/s10265-009-0225-9. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
9
Use of thermal imaging and the photochemical reflectance index (PRI) to detect wheat response to elevated CO and drought.利用热成像和光化学反射指数(PRI)来探测小麦对升高的 CO 和干旱的响应。
Plant Cell Environ. 2023 Jan;46(1):76-92. doi: 10.1111/pce.14472. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
10
Effects of timing and defoliation intensity on growth, yield and gas exchange rate of wheat grown under well-watered and drought conditions.在水分充足和干旱条件下,打叶时间和打叶强度对小麦生长、产量及气体交换率的影响
Pak J Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 1;10(21):3794-800. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.3794.3800.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating Leaf CO Assimilation in C Plants Using a Handheld Porometer With Chlorophyll Fluorometer in Field Conditions.在田间条件下使用手持式气孔计和叶绿素荧光仪估算C植物叶片的CO₂同化率
Plant Cell Environ. 2025 Oct;48(10):7213-7224. doi: 10.1111/pce.70006. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Mechanistic insights and future perspectives of drought stress management in staple crops.主要作物干旱胁迫管理的机制见解与未来展望
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 27;16:1547452. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547452. eCollection 2025.
3
Utilizing physiologies, transcriptomics, and metabolomics to unravel key genes and metabolites of Bge. seedlings in response to drought stress.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of a biochemical model of steady-state photosynthesis.稳态光合作用生化模型的演变。
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Sep;44(9):2811-2837. doi: 10.1111/pce.14070. Epub 2021 May 17.
2
Unravelling mechanisms and impacts of day respiration in plant leaves: an introduction to a Virtual Issue.解析植物叶片日间呼吸的机制与影响:虚拟专辑介绍
New Phytol. 2021 Apr;230(1):5-10. doi: 10.1111/nph.17164.
3
Acclimation of leaf photosynthesis and respiration to warming in field-grown wheat.田间生长的小麦对增温的叶片光合作用和呼吸作用的驯化。
利用生理学、转录组学和代谢组学来揭示蒙古沙冬青幼苗响应干旱胁迫的关键基因和代谢产物。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jan 14;15:1484688. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1484688. eCollection 2024.
4
Genome-wide analysis of transmembrane 9 superfamily genes in wheat () and their expression in the roots under nitrogen limitation and PDR1 treatment conditions.小麦中跨膜9超家族基因的全基因组分析及其在氮素限制和PDR1处理条件下根部的表达
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Jan 8;14:1324974. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1324974. eCollection 2023.
5
Acetic acid positively modulates proline metabolism for mitigating PEG-mediated drought stress in Maize and Arabidopsis.乙酸正向调节脯氨酸代谢以减轻聚乙二醇介导的玉米和拟南芥干旱胁迫。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Jul 19;14:1167238. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1167238. eCollection 2023.
6
Short- and long-term responses of leaf day respiration to elevated atmospheric CO2.叶片日间呼吸对大气 CO2 升高的短期和长期响应。
Plant Physiol. 2023 Apr 3;191(4):2204-2217. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac582.
7
Neglecting acclimation of photosynthesis under drought can cause significant errors in predicting leaf photosynthesis in wheat.忽视干旱下光合作用的驯化会导致预测小麦叶片光合作用时产生显著误差。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Jan;29(2):505-521. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16488. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Jul;44(7):2331-2346. doi: 10.1111/pce.13971. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
The impact of global dimming on crop yields is determined by the source-sink imbalance of carbon during grain filling.全球变暗对作物产量的影响取决于灌浆期碳的源库失衡。
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Feb;27(3):689-708. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15453. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Accounting for mesophyll conductance substantially improves C-based estimates of intrinsic water-use efficiency.考虑叶肉导度可显著改善基于碳的内在水分利用效率估算。
New Phytol. 2021 Feb;229(3):1326-1338. doi: 10.1111/nph.16958. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
6
The hot and the cold: unravelling the variable response of plant respiration to temperature.热与冷:解读植物呼吸对温度的可变响应
Funct Plant Biol. 2005 Apr;32(2):87-105. doi: 10.1071/FP03176.
7
Transient shade and drought have divergent impacts on the temperature sensitivity of dark respiration in leaves of Geum urbanum.短暂的遮荫和干旱对城市水杨梅叶片暗呼吸的温度敏感性有不同影响。
Funct Plant Biol. 2008 Dec;35(11):1135-1146. doi: 10.1071/FP08113.
8
Increasing trends in regional heatwaves.区域性热浪的增加趋势。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 3;11(1):3357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16970-7.
9
The Kok effect revisited.再谈科克效应。
New Phytol. 2020 Sep;227(6):1764-1775. doi: 10.1111/nph.16638. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
10
Using photorespiratory oxygen response to analyse leaf mesophyll resistance.利用光呼吸耗氧反应分析叶片叶肉阻力。
Photosynth Res. 2020 Apr;144(1):85-99. doi: 10.1007/s11120-020-00716-z. Epub 2020 Feb 10.