School of Population Health, Health Economics and Data Analytics, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265394. eCollection 2022.
The translation gap between knowledge production and implementation into clinical practice and policy is an ongoing challenge facing researchers, funders, clinicians and policy makers globally. Research generated close to practice and in collaboration with end users is an approach that is recognised as an effective strategy to facilitate an improvement in the relevance and use of health research as well as building research capacity amongst end users. The Research Translation Projects (RTP) program funded by the Western Australian (WA) Department of Health facilitates clinical and academic collaboration through competitive funding of short-term research projects. Its aim is to improve healthcare practice while also finding efficiencies that can be delivered to the WA health system. A mixed methods approach was adopted to evaluate the research impact of the RTP program, at completion of the two-year funding period, across a range of impact domains through the adaptation and application of the Canadian Academy of Health Sciences' (CAHS) framework for research impact. In addition, further analysis was undertaken to address specific objectives of the RTP program more closely, in particular research capacity building and collaboration and health system Inefficiencies targeted by the program. Social network analysis was applied to assess the extent and growth of collaboration across WA health organisations over time. Results indicated that the 'bottom up' approach to research translation has triggered modest, yet positive outcomes across impact domains including advancing knowledge, collaboration and capacity building as well as contributing to changes in policy and practice. Additionally, the projects identified opportunities by which inefficiencies in the health system can be addressed. Further work is required to better understand the pathways by which short-term outcomes can be translated into more long-term impacts and the mechanisms that trigger this process.
知识生产与临床实践和政策实施之间的转化差距是全球研究人员、资助者、临床医生和政策制定者面临的持续挑战。接近实践并与最终用户合作开展的研究被认为是促进提高卫生研究的相关性和实用性以及在最终用户中建立研究能力的有效策略。西澳大利亚州(WA)卫生部资助的研究转化项目(RTP)计划通过竞争性资助短期研究项目促进临床和学术合作。其目的是改善医疗保健实践,同时寻找可以交付给 WA 卫生系统的效率。在两年资助期结束时,采用混合方法评估了 RTP 计划的研究影响,通过改编和应用加拿大健康科学院(CAHS)的研究影响框架,在一系列影响领域评估了研究影响。此外,还进行了进一步的分析,以更密切地解决 RTP 计划的具体目标,特别是研究能力建设和合作以及该计划针对的卫生系统效率低下问题。社会网络分析用于评估随着时间的推移,WA 卫生组织之间合作的程度和增长。结果表明,“自下而上”的研究转化方法在包括推进知识、合作和能力建设以及促进政策和实践变革在内的各个影响领域产生了适度但积极的结果。此外,这些项目确定了可以解决卫生系统效率低下问题的机会。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解短期成果转化为更长期影响的途径以及触发这一过程的机制。