• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在学术临床环境中开展研究合作:挑战与经验教训

Developing Research Collaborations in an Academic Clinical Setting: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

作者信息

Sahs John A, Nicasio Andel V, Storey Joan E, Guarnaccia Peter J, Lewis-Fernández Roberto

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, Adult Psychiatry Clinic, New York Presbyterian-Columbia, 635 West 165th Street, 6th floor, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Center of Excellence for Cultural Competence, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, USA.

出版信息

Community Ment Health J. 2017 Aug;53(6):647-660. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0073-8. Epub 2016 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10597-016-0073-8
PMID:27900495
Abstract

Research collaboration in "real world" practice settings may enhance the meaningfulness of the findings and reduce barriers to implementation of novel intervention strategies. This study describes an initiative to integrate research into a hospital-based outpatient psychiatric clinic within an academic medical center, focusing on collaborative processes across three research projects. We report on the varied outcomes of the projects and utilize data from two focus groups to identify the key elements that contributed to the challenges and successes. We identify barriers to practice-research collaborations that emerged even when the initial circumstances of the partnership were favorable. These barriers include the presence of varied agendas across clinicians and investigators, resource constraints, limited staff buy-in, and staff turnover. In highlighting the lessons learned in this collaborative process, we hope to facilitate successful partnerships in other clinical settings.

摘要

在“现实世界”实践环境中的研究合作可能会增强研究结果的意义,并减少新干预策略实施的障碍。本研究描述了一项将研究整合到学术医疗中心内一家医院门诊精神科诊所的倡议,重点关注三个研究项目的协作过程。我们报告了这些项目的不同结果,并利用来自两个焦点小组的数据来确定导致挑战和成功的关键因素。我们确定了即使在合作初期情况有利时也会出现的实践-研究合作障碍。这些障碍包括临床医生和研究人员之间存在不同的议程、资源限制、员工参与度有限以及人员流动。在强调这一协作过程中吸取的经验教训时,我们希望促进其他临床环境中的成功合作。

相似文献

1
Developing Research Collaborations in an Academic Clinical Setting: Challenges and Lessons Learned.在学术临床环境中开展研究合作:挑战与经验教训
Community Ment Health J. 2017 Aug;53(6):647-660. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-0073-8. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
2
VA-academic partnerships: challenges and rewards for new VA mental health investigators.VA 学术合作:新 VA 心理健康研究员面临的挑战和收获。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):709-13. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9575-1. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
3
Application of mixed-methods design in community-engaged research: Lessons learned from an evidence-based intervention for Latinos with chronic illness and minor depression.混合方法设计在社区参与研究中的应用:从针对患有慢性病和轻度抑郁症的拉丁裔的循证干预中吸取的经验教训。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Aug;63:29-38. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
4
Bronx Community Collaborative Opportunities for Research and Education: Implementation and Evaluation of a Community-Academic Partnership.布朗克斯社区研究与教育合作机会:社区-学术伙伴关系的实施与评估
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(3):273-282. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0055.
5
Institutionalization of community partnerships: the challenge for academic health centers.社区伙伴关系的制度化:学术健康中心面临的挑战
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012 Nov;23(4):1512-26. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2012.0161.
6
Perceptions of community-based participatory research in the Delta Nutrition Intervention Research Initiative: an academic perspective.三角洲营养干预研究倡议中基于社区的参与性研究认知:学术视角
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Sep;12(5):744-52. doi: 10.1177/1524839909353743. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
7
Developing an academic-community partnership for research in prostate cancer.建立前列腺癌研究的学术-社区合作伙伴关系。
J Cancer Educ. 2006 Summer;21(2):99-103. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2102_13.
8
Partnering for health: collaborative leadership between a community health center and the YWCA central Massachusetts.携手促进健康:社区健康中心与马萨诸塞州中 YWCA 的合作领导关系。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):279-87. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182294fe7.
9
Clinical research in an academic psychiatry department: some general principles and case studies.学术精神科部门的临床研究:一些一般原则和案例研究。
Australas Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;25(6):596-599. doi: 10.1177/1039856217734675. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
10
Development of a Biomedical Program of Research in the Blackfeet Community: Challenges and Rewards.在黑脚社区开展生物医学研究计划:挑战与收获。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Sep;64(1-2):118-125. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12352. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging epigenetics and pharmacology through systematic reviews tailored to WBS methodology: the triangle decision-making model as a pioneering translational biological drug delivery system.通过针对威廉姆斯-贝伦综合征(WBS)方法定制的系统评价来弥合表观遗传学与药理学之间的差距:三角形决策模型作为一种开创性的转化生物药物递送系统。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 20;12:1552904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1552904. eCollection 2025.
2
Psilocybin for Opioid Use Disorder in Two Adults Stabilized on Buprenorphine: A Technical Report on Study Modifications and Preliminary Findings.在两名使用丁丙诺啡稳定治疗的成年人中,使用裸盖菇素治疗阿片类物质使用障碍:关于研究修改和初步结果的技术报告
Psychedelic Med (New Rochelle). 2023 Dec 13;1(4):253-261. doi: 10.1089/psymed.2023.0012. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Training community-based primary care physicians in the screening and management of mental health disorders among Latino primary care patients.对社区基层医疗医生进行培训,使其能够对拉丁裔基层医疗患者的心理健康障碍进行筛查和管理。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2016 Jan-Feb;38:71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
2
Characterizing the Use of Research-Community Partnerships in Studies of Evidence-Based Interventions in Children's Community Services.儿童社区服务循证干预研究中研究-社区伙伴关系的使用特征分析
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2016 Jan;43(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10488-014-0622-9.
3
Using the collaborative intervention planning framework to adapt a health-care manager intervention to a new population and provider group to improve the health of people with serious mental illness.
Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review.描述医疗保健提供者和医疗机构参与研究的证据基础:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08887-2.
4
An impact review of a Western Australian research translation program.西澳大利亚州研究转化计划的影响评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265394. eCollection 2022.
5
Lessons learned from two clinical trials on nutritional supplements to reduce aggressive behaviour.从两项营养补充剂减少攻击性行为的临床试验中吸取的经验教训。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;28(4):607-614. doi: 10.1111/jep.13653. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
6
Exploring Suicidal Ideation Using an Innovative Mobile App-Strength Within Me: The Usability and Acceptability of Setting up a Trial Involving Mobile Technology and Mental Health Service Users.使用创新移动应用程序“我内心的力量”探索自杀意念:开展一项涉及移动技术和心理健康服务使用者的试验的可用性和可接受性
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Sep 28;7(9):e18407. doi: 10.2196/18407.
7
An academic perspective of participation in healthcare redesign.参与医疗保健再设计的学术视角。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 20;17(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0486-2.
8
Trends in clinical trial investigator workforce and turnover: An analysis of the U.S. FDA 1572 BMIS database.临床试验研究者队伍及人员流动趋势:对美国食品药品监督管理局1572号生物医学研究监测信息系统数据库的分析
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 May 21;15:100380. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100380. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
How are evidence generation partnerships between researchers and policy-makers enacted in practice? A qualitative interview study.研究人员和政策制定者之间的循证生成伙伴关系如何在实践中实施?一项定性访谈研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 15;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0441-2.
运用协作干预规划框架,使医疗保健管理者的干预措施适用于新的人群和医疗服务提供者群体,以改善严重精神疾病患者的健康状况。
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 30;9:178. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0178-9.
4
Activation, self-management, engagement, and retention in behavioral health care: a randomized clinical trial of the DECIDE intervention.行为健康护理中的激活、自我管理、参与和保持:DECIDE 干预的随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 May;71(5):557-65. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4519.
5
Creating Mechanisms for Meaningful Collaboration Between Members of Urban Communities and University-Based HIV Prevention Researchers.创建城市社区成员与大学艾滋病预防研究人员之间有意义合作的机制。
Soc Work Ment Health. 2007 Jan 1;5(1-2). doi: 10.1300/J200v05n01_07.
6
Therapists and researchers: advancing collaboration.治疗师与研究人员:推进合作。
Psychother Res. 2015;25(1):95-107. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2013.838655. Epub 2013 Nov 14.
7
BUILDING A RESEARCH-COMMUNITY COLLABORATIVE TO IMPROVE COMMUNITY CARE FOR INFANTS AND TODDLERS AT-RISK FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS.建立一个研究社区合作项目,以改善对有自闭症谱系障碍风险的婴幼儿的社区护理。
J Community Psychol. 2012 Aug;40(6):715-734. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21501.
8
Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes.社区参与式研究的实用步骤:从投入到产出。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Winter;40(4):904-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00719.x.
9
Developing and maintaining partnerships as the foundation of implementation and implementation science: reflections over a half century.发展并维持伙伴关系作为实施及实施科学的基础:半个世纪的反思
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Jul;39(4):317-20. doi: 10.1007/s10488-011-0402-8.
10
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.实施研究的结果:概念区别、测量挑战和研究议程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.