Balch Jeremy A, Ruppert Matthew M, Loftus Tyler J, Guan Ziyuan, Ren Yuanfang, Upchurch Gilbert R, Ozrazgat-Baslanti Tezcan, Rashidi Parisa, Bihorac Azra
Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Intelligent Critical Care Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Aug 24;11:e48297. doi: 10.2196/48297.
Machine learning-enabled clinical information systems (ML-CISs) have the potential to drive health care delivery and research. The Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) data standard has been increasingly applied in developing these systems. However, methods for applying FHIR to ML-CISs are variable.
This study evaluates and compares the functionalities, strengths, and weaknesses of existing systems and proposes guidelines for optimizing future work with ML-CISs.
Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched for articles describing machine learning systems that were used for clinical data analytics or decision support in compliance with FHIR standards. Information regarding each system's functionality, data sources, formats, security, performance, resource requirements, scalability, strengths, and limitations was compared across systems.
A total of 39 articles describing FHIR-based ML-CISs were divided into the following three categories according to their primary focus: clinical decision support systems (n=18), data management and analytic platforms (n=10), or auxiliary modules and application programming interfaces (n=11). Model strengths included novel use of cloud systems, Bayesian networks, visualization strategies, and techniques for translating unstructured or free-text data to FHIR frameworks. Many intelligent systems lacked electronic health record interoperability and externally validated evidence of clinical efficacy.
Shortcomings in current ML-CISs can be addressed by incorporating modular and interoperable data management, analytic platforms, secure interinstitutional data exchange, and application programming interfaces with adequate scalability to support both real-time and prospective clinical applications that use electronic health record platforms with diverse implementations.
支持机器学习的临床信息系统(ML-CIS)有推动医疗保健服务和研究的潜力。快速医疗保健互操作性资源(FHIR)数据标准在这些系统的开发中得到了越来越广泛的应用。然而,将FHIR应用于ML-CIS的方法各不相同。
本研究评估并比较现有系统的功能、优势和劣势,并提出优化ML-CIS未来工作的指南。
在Embase、PubMed和科学网中搜索描述符合FHIR标准的用于临床数据分析或决策支持的机器学习系统的文章。对各系统的功能、数据源、格式、安全性、性能、资源需求、可扩展性、优势和局限性等信息进行跨系统比较。
共39篇描述基于FHIR的ML-CIS的文章,根据其主要重点分为以下三类:临床决策支持系统(18篇)、数据管理和分析平台(10篇)或辅助模块和应用程序编程接口(APIs,11篇)。模型优势包括云系统的新颖应用、贝叶斯网络、可视化策略以及将非结构化或自由文本数据转换为FHIR框架的技术。许多智能系统缺乏电子健康记录互操作性以及临床疗效的外部验证证据。
当前ML-CIS的缺点可以通过纳入模块化和可互操作的数据管理、分析平台、安全的机构间数据交换以及具有足够可扩展性的应用程序编程接口来解决,以支持使用具有不同实现方式的电子健康记录平台的实时和前瞻性临床应用。