Nartova-Bochaver Sofya, Reznichenko Sofia, Bardadymov Vasily, Khachaturova Milana, Yerofeyeva Victoria, Khachatryan Narine, Kryazh Iryna, Kamble Shanmukh, Zulkarnain Zulkarnain
School of Psychology, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
"Scholae Mundi Russia" Charity Foundation, Moscow, Russia.
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:834421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834421. eCollection 2022.
The home environment is a particularly significant part of life that is supposed to satisfy inhabitants' needs, form their identity, and contribute to psychological wellbeing. The construct of home attachment is especially relevant for students as a most mobile social group. This study is devoted to the validation of in a student sample from five countries (Armenia, India, Indonesia, Russia, and Ukraine). A total of 1,349 (17-26 years; M = 19.82, SD = 2.14; 78% females) university students participated in the study and filled in the 14 items of . In order to avoid redundant items with high error covariances damaging the model, a new scale-the was developed by eliminating seven items. The shortened scale has satisfactory structure validity in terms of model fit in all countries except Indonesia; internal reliability values were acceptable in all countries. Measurement invariance across countries was tested with Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MG CFA) and Alignment Analysis. MG CFA confirmed both configurational and metric invariance. The invariance of item factor loadings, as well as item intercepts, was also confirmed by the Alignment Analysis. The mean scores varied across cultures, with the highest in India and the lowest in Russia. The final version of is a valid, reliable tool that may be recommended for use in cross-cultural research. However, the factor structure robustness in the Indonesian population should be investigated thoroughly.
家庭环境是生活中一个特别重要的部分，它应该满足居住者的需求，塑造他们的身份认同，并有助于心理健康。家庭依恋的概念对于作为最具流动性的社会群体的学生来说尤为相关。本研究致力于在来自五个国家（亚美尼亚、印度、印度尼西亚、俄罗斯和乌克兰）的学生样本中对[相关内容]进行验证。共有1349名（年龄在17 - 26岁之间；M = 19.82，SD = 2.14；78%为女性）大学生参与了该研究，并填写了[相关量表]的14个项目。为了避免具有高误差协方差的冗余项目破坏模型，通过剔除七个项目开发了一个新的量表——[新量表名称]。除印度尼西亚外，缩短后的量表在所有国家的模型拟合方面都具有令人满意的结构效度；所有国家的内部信度值都可以接受。使用多组验证性因素分析（MG CFA）和一致性分析对各国之间的测量不变性进行了测试。MG CFA证实了构型不变性和度量不变性。一致性分析也证实了项目因素负荷以及项目截距的不变性。平均得分在不同文化中有所不同，印度最高，俄罗斯最低。[量表名称]的最终版本是一个有效、可靠的工具，可推荐用于跨文化研究。然而，印度尼西亚人群中[量表名称]因素结构的稳健性应进行深入研究。
