• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Friendly Home and Inhabitants' Morality: Mutual Relationships.友好家园与居民道德:相互关系
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 11;8:2348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02348. eCollection 2017.
2
Why be moral? Children's explicit motives for prosocial-moral action.为什么要有道德?儿童亲社会道德行为的明确动机。
Front Psychol. 2015 May 6;6:552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00552. eCollection 2015.
3
If People Are Attached to Plants, Do They Love Other People? Case of the Russian Youth.如果人们依恋植物,他们会爱其他人吗?俄罗斯青年的案例。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 22;10(2):40. doi: 10.3390/bs10020040.
4
Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.道德心理学是关系调节:统一、等级、平等和相称的道德动机。
Psychol Rev. 2011 Jan;118(1):57-75. doi: 10.1037/a0021867.
5
Personality traits and achievement motives: theoretical and empirical relations between the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised and the Achievement Motives Scale.人格特质与成就动机:修订版大五人格量表与成就动机量表之间的理论与实证关系
Psychol Rep. 2009 Apr;104(2):579-92. doi: 10.2466/pr0.104.2.579-592.
6
Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: a study of influential moral figures.层级整合代理与共通体:有影响力的道德人物研究。
J Pers. 2012 Aug;80(4):1117-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00764.x. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Reconciling the self and morality: an empirical model of moral centrality development.协调自我与道德:道德中心发展的实证模型。
Dev Psychol. 2009 Nov;45(6):1669-81. doi: 10.1037/a0017418.
8
Surveying the moral landscape: moral motives and group-based moralities.审视道德景观:道德动机与基于群体的道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;17(3):219-36. doi: 10.1177/1088868313480274. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
9
What are the Bad Habits and Behaviors of Inconsiderate Doctors in Chinese Inhabitants' Mind? A Cross-Sectional Study.中国居民心目中不体贴医生的不良习惯和行为有哪些?一项横断面研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Apr 6;15:583-595. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358680. eCollection 2022.
10
Moral context matters: a reply to Graham.道德语境很重要:对格雷厄姆的回应。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;17(3):242-7. doi: 10.1177/1088868313492021.

引用本文的文献

1
Measurement Invariance of the Short Home Attachment Scale: A Cross-Cultural Study.简短家庭依恋量表的测量不变性:一项跨文化研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 11;13:834421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834421. eCollection 2022.
2
If People Are Attached to Plants, Do They Love Other People? Case of the Russian Youth.如果人们依恋植物,他们会爱其他人吗?俄罗斯青年的案例。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 22;10(2):40. doi: 10.3390/bs10020040.

本文引用的文献

1
How pleasant sounds promote and annoying sounds impede health: a cognitive approach.悦耳之音有益健康,刺耳之音有害健康:认知角度的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Apr 8;10(4):1439-61. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10041439.
2
Surveying the moral landscape: moral motives and group-based moralities.审视道德景观:道德动机与基于群体的道德。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2013 Aug;17(3):219-36. doi: 10.1177/1088868313480274. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
3
The Dynamic Interplay between Appraisal and Core Affect in Daily Life.在日常生活中评价与核心情绪的动态相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 8;3:380. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00380. eCollection 2012.
4
Gratitude and well-being: a review and theoretical integration.感激与幸福感:综述与理论整合。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Nov;30(7):890-905. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
5
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.自由主义者和保守主义者依赖不同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015141.
6
Housing environment and mental health outcomes: A levels of analysis perspective.居住环境与心理健康结果:基于分析层次的视角
J Environ Psychol. 2007 Mar;27(1):79-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.001.
7
The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions.积极情绪的拓展与建构理论
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Sep 29;359(1449):1367-78. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1512.
8
Justice and identity: changing perspectives on what is fair.正义与身份:对公平内涵的不断变化的观点
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):298-310. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_03.
9
Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion.核心情感与情绪的心理建构。
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145.
10
A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms.带有线索的房间:基于办公室和卧室的个性判断。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Mar;82(3):379-98. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.3.379.

友好家园与居民道德:相互关系

Friendly Home and Inhabitants' Morality: Mutual Relationships.

作者信息

Nartova-Bochaver Sofya K, Kuznetsova Valeriya B

机构信息

School of Psychology, National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Moscow, Russia.

Laboratory of Differential Psychophysiology of the Research Institute of Physiology and Basic Medicine, Novosibirsk, Russia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 11;8:2348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02348. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02348
PMID:29375450
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5768627/
Abstract

The study is aimed at investigating the connection between the friendliness of the home environment and the moral motives' level. The friendliness of the home environment includes two aspects: the number of functions provided by home (functionality) and the congruence of these functions with inhabitants' needs (relevance). The theoretical framework of the study was formed by research and ideas emphasizing the interplay between people and their environments. We hypothesized that the friendliness of the home environment and inhabitants' moral motives would have a reciprocal relationship: the friendlier the home the higher the inhabitants' moral motives' level, and, vice versa, the higher the person's moral motives' level the more positive home image. The respondents were 550 students (25% male). The Home Environment Functionality Questionnaire, the Home Environment Relevance Questionnaire, and the Moral Motivation Model Scale were used. As expected, it was found that the friendliness of the home environment and the inhabitants' moral motives are in reciprocal synergetic relationships. Relevance formed more nuanced correlation patterns with moral motives than functionality did. Functionality predicted moral motives poorly whereas moral motives predicted functionality strongly. Finally, relevance and moral motives were found to be in mutual relationships whereas the perceived functionality was predicted by moral motives only.

摘要

该研究旨在调查家庭环境的友好程度与道德动机水平之间的联系。家庭环境的友好程度包括两个方面:家庭提供的功能数量(功能性)以及这些功能与居住者需求的契合度(相关性)。该研究的理论框架是由强调人与环境之间相互作用的研究和观点构成的。我们假设家庭环境的友好程度与居住者的道德动机之间存在相互关系:家庭越友好,居住者的道德动机水平越高;反之,个人的道德动机水平越高,家庭形象越积极。受访者为550名学生(25%为男性)。使用了家庭环境功能性问卷、家庭环境相关性问卷和道德动机模型量表。正如预期的那样,研究发现家庭环境的友好程度与居住者的道德动机处于相互协同的关系。与功能性相比,相关性与道德动机形成了更细微的相关模式。功能性对道德动机的预测能力较差,而道德动机对功能性的预测能力较强。最后,发现相关性和道德动机相互关联,而感知到的功能性仅由道德动机预测。