• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内外侧半骨盆切除术:68例回顾性分析

External and internal hemipelvectomy: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases.

作者信息

Karaca Mustafa Onur, Özbek Emre Anıl, Özyıldıran Mustafa, Merter Abdullah, Başarır Kerem, Yıldız Hüseyin Yusuf, Sağlık Yener

机构信息

Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, 06230 Altındağ, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(1):132-141. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.560. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

DOI:10.52312/jdrs.2022.560
PMID:35361087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9057530/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the factors that may be associated with surgical site infection and mortality in pelvic resection surgeries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 68 patients (40 males, 28 females; mean age: 43±16.2 years; range, 11 to 70 years) who underwent internal or external hemipelvectomy between January 2010 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We reviewed data concerning histopathological diagnosis, surgical technique, pelvic resection type, tumor size, postoperative infection, duration of follow-up, and mortality.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 45.5±42.2 months. Among 68 patients, 29 (42.6%) cases underwent external hemipelvectomy and 39 (57.4%) cases underwent internal hemipelvectomy. Reconstruction was performed in 14 (20.6%) patients who underwent internal hemipelvectomy. Of all patients, 61 had primary malignant pelvic tumors and two had metastatic pelvic tumors. Of the other five patients, two had a giant cell tumor, two had a pelvic hydatid cyst, and one had an aneurysmal bone cyst. The three most common pelvic tumors were chondrosarcoma (n=25, 36.7%), osteosarcoma (n=13, 19.1%), and Ewing sarcoma (n=8, 11.8%). Surgical site infections were observed in 34 (50.0%) patients. Of 34 patients, 15 (22.1%) had superficial infections and 19 (27.9%) had deep surgical infections. The superficial and deep infection rates were higher in the external hemipelvectomy group compared to internal hemipelvectomy (p=0.02). Patients with postoperative infection had a mean survival period of 36.0 months compared to 79.8 months in patients without infection (p=0.037). The patients treated with internal hemipelvectomy had a mean survival of 97.0 months compared to 25.7 months in patients treated with external hemipelvectomy (p<0.0001). The effect of Enneking stages of malignant pelvic tumors on survival was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cumulative survival decreased, as the stage progressed (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The type of surgical technique affects the possibility of postoperative infection. Postoperative infection, surgical method, and stage of the tumor are associated with survival.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查骨盆切除术手术部位感染和死亡率可能相关的因素。

患者与方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2020年1月期间接受内半骨盆切除术或外半骨盆切除术的68例患者(40例男性,28例女性;平均年龄:43±16.2岁;范围11至70岁)。我们查阅了有关组织病理学诊断、手术技术、骨盆切除类型、肿瘤大小、术后感染、随访时间和死亡率的数据。

结果

平均随访时间为45.5±42.2个月。68例患者中,29例(42.6%)接受了外半骨盆切除术,39例(57.4%)接受了内半骨盆切除术。14例(20.6%)接受内半骨盆切除术的患者进行了重建。所有患者中,61例患有原发性恶性骨盆肿瘤,2例患有转移性骨盆肿瘤。其他5例患者中,2例患有骨巨细胞瘤,2例患有骨盆包虫囊肿,1例患有动脉瘤样骨囊肿。三种最常见的骨盆肿瘤是软骨肉瘤(n = 25,36.7%)、骨肉瘤(n = 13,19.1%)和尤因肉瘤(n = 8,11.8%)。34例(50.0%)患者发生了手术部位感染。在34例患者中,15例(22.1%)发生浅表感染,19例(27.9%)发生深部手术感染。外半骨盆切除术组的浅表和深部感染率高于内半骨盆切除术组(p = 0.02)。术后感染患者的平均生存期为36.0个月,而未感染患者为79.8个月(p = 0.037)。接受内半骨盆切除术的患者平均生存期为97.0个月,而接受外半骨盆切除术的患者为25.7个月(p<0.0001)。采用Kaplan-Meier分析研究恶性骨盆肿瘤的Enneking分期对生存率的影响。随着分期进展,累积生存率下降(p<0.0001)。

结论

手术技术类型影响术后感染的可能性。术后感染、手术方法和肿瘤分期与生存率相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/6b5562e783c8/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/87f1ed777464/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/17e400979e8f/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/c4606f4b65fa/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/5dabdd70ff89/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/6b5562e783c8/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/87f1ed777464/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/17e400979e8f/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/c4606f4b65fa/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/5dabdd70ff89/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f76/9057530/6b5562e783c8/JDRS-2022-33-1-132-141-F5.jpg

相似文献

1
External and internal hemipelvectomy: A retrospective analysis of 68 cases.内外侧半骨盆切除术:68例回顾性分析
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2022;33(1):132-141. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.560. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
2
Pelvic ring reconstruction with a double-barreled free vascularized fibula graft after resection of malignant pelvic bone tumor.恶性骨盆骨肿瘤切除术后采用双筒游离带血管腓骨移植进行骨盆环重建。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 May;135(5):619-25. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2197-7. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
3
Infection after surgical resection for pelvic bone tumors: an analysis of 270 patients from one institution.骨盆骨肿瘤切除术后感染:单中心 270 例患者分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jan;472(1):349-59. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3250-x. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
4
Does adding sacroiliac (type IV) resection to periacetabular (type II) resection increase complications or provide worse clinical outcomes? An institutional experience and systematic review.单纯行骶髂关节(IV 型)切除与髋臼周围(II 型)切除联合治疗是否会增加并发症或导致更差的临床结果?一项机构经验和系统评价。
Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct;56:102116. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102116. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Analysis of surgical and oncological outcome in internal and external hemipelvectomy in 34 patients above the age of 65 years at a mean follow-up of 56 months.对34例65岁以上患者进行内、外半骨盆切除术的手术及肿瘤学结果分析,平均随访56个月。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 18;16:33. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0494-5.
6
Evaluation of a novel classification system to predict local recurrence in sarcoma patients undergoing hemipelvectomy with iliosacral resection.评估一种新的分类系统,以预测接受半骨盆切除术和髂骶切除术的肉瘤患者的局部复发情况。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):290-296. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1180.R1.
7
Cost analysis of three different surgical procedures for treatment of a pelvic tumour.三种不同手术方法治疗盆腔肿瘤的成本分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998 Oct;383(5):359-63. doi: 10.1007/s004230050149.
8
Survival rate and perioperative data of patients who have undergone hemipelvectomy: a retrospective case series.接受半骨盆切除术患者的生存率及围手术期数据:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct 7;14(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1001-7.
9
Temporary External Fixation Can Stabilize Hip Transposition Arthroplasty After Resection of Malignant Periacetabular Bone Tumors.临时外固定可稳定恶性髋臼周围骨肿瘤切除术后髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Aug;477(8):1892-1901. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000764.
10
Pelvic limb-salvage surgery for malignant tumors.恶性肿瘤的盆腔肢体挽救手术。
Int Orthop. 2001;24(6):311-5. doi: 10.1007/s002640000197.

引用本文的文献

1
Developmental Patterns and Risk Factors of Scoliosis After Hemipelvectomy for the Pelvic Bone Tumor.骨盆骨肿瘤半骨盆切除术后脊柱侧弯的发展模式及危险因素
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 27;14(21):2392. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212392.
2
[Surgical management of pelvic tumors through hemipelvectomy].[通过半骨盆切除术治疗盆腔肿瘤的手术管理]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Mar 4;62(2):1-8. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10711647.
3
Retrospective analysis of mortality and quality of life after hip disarticulation or hemipelvectomy: a report on 15 patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Management and retrospective analysis of pelvic ramus tumors and tumor-like lesions: Evaluation with 31 cases.骨盆支肿瘤及肿瘤样病变的管理与回顾性分析:31例病例评估
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(2):184-192. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.72762. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Surgical and oncological outcomes after hindquarter amputation for pelvic sarcoma.骨盆肉瘤后后肢截肢的手术和肿瘤学结果。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Jun;102-B(6):788-794. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B6.BJJ-2019-1317.R1.
3
Rate and risk factors for wound complications after internal hemipelvectomy.
髋关节离断或半骨盆切除术患者的死亡率和生活质量的回顾性分析:15 例报告。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):4943-4949. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04783-4. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
Surgical Site Infection after Bone Tumor Surgery: Risk Factors and New Preventive Techniques.骨肿瘤手术后手术部位感染:危险因素与新的预防技术
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 19;14(18):4527. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184527.
内半骨盆切除术(internal hemipelvectomy)后伤口并发症的发生率和风险因素。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):280-284. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1329.
4
Impact of unplanned resection and re-excision of a soft tissue sarcoma on prognosis.软组织肉瘤计划外切除和再次切除对预后的影响。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2020 May;98(5):281-287. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2019.10.007. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
5
COMPLICATIONS AND COST ANALYSIS OF HEMIPELVECTOMY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PELVIC TUMORS.半骨盆切除术治疗盆腔肿瘤的并发症及成本分析
Acta Ortop Bras. 2019 Mar-Apr;27(2):104-107. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220192702206721.
6
A review of the postoperative lymphatic leakage.术后淋巴漏的综述。
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 20;8(40):69062-69075. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17297. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.
7
Oncological and surgical outcome after treatment of pelvic sarcomas.盆腔肉瘤治疗后的肿瘤学和手术结果。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 15;12(2):e0172203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172203. eCollection 2017.
8
Survival rate and perioperative data of patients who have undergone hemipelvectomy: a retrospective case series.接受半骨盆切除术患者的生存率及围手术期数据:一项回顾性病例系列研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct 7;14(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1001-7.
9
HEMIPELVECTOMY: ERASTO GAERTNER HOSPITAL'S EXPERIENCES WITH 32 CASES IN 10 YEARS.半侧骨盆切除术:埃拉斯托·盖特纳医院10年32例病例的经验
Rev Bras Ortop. 2015 Nov 17;45(4):413-9. doi: 10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30390-6. eCollection 2010 Jul-Aug.
10
Analysis of surgical and oncological outcome in internal and external hemipelvectomy in 34 patients above the age of 65 years at a mean follow-up of 56 months.对34例65岁以上患者进行内、外半骨盆切除术的手术及肿瘤学结果分析,平均随访56个月。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 18;16:33. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0494-5.