• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测严重受损的抑郁患者对多模式日间诊所治疗的无反应:一种机器学习方法。

Predicting non-response to multimodal day clinic treatment in severely impaired depressed patients: a machine learning approach.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Zurich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland.

Vagelos School of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Medical Centre, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09226-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09226-5
PMID:35361809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8971434/
Abstract

A considerable number of depressed patients do not respond to treatment. Accurate prediction of non-response to routine clinical care may help in treatment planning and improve results. A longitudinal sample of N = 239 depressed patients was assessed at admission to multi-modal day clinic treatment, after six weeks, and at discharge. First, patient's treatment response was modelled by identifying longitudinal trajectories using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17). Then, individual items of the HDRS-17 at admission as well as individual patient characteristics were entered as predictors of response/non-response trajectories into the binary classification model (eXtremeGradient Boosting; XGBoost). The model was evaluated on a hold-out set and explained in human-interpretable form by SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP) values. The prediction model yielded a multi-class AUC = 0.80 in the hold-out set. The predictive power for the binary classification yielded an AUC = 0.83 (sensitivity = .80, specificity = .77). Most relevant predictors for non-response were insomnia symptoms, younger age, anxiety symptoms, depressed mood, being unemployed, suicidal ideation and somatic symptoms of depressive disorder. Non-responders to routine treatment for depression can be identified and screened for potential next-generation treatments. Such predictors may help personalize treatment and improve treatment response.

摘要

相当数量的抑郁症患者对治疗没有反应。准确预测对常规临床护理的无反应可能有助于治疗计划并改善结果。对接受多模式日间诊所治疗的 N=239 名抑郁症患者进行了纵向样本评估,在入院时、六周后和出院时进行评估。首先,通过使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS-17)识别纵向轨迹来对患者的治疗反应进行建模。然后,将 HDRS-17 的入院时的各个项目以及各个患者特征作为反应/无反应轨迹的预测因子输入到二分类模型(极端梯度提升;XGBoost)中。该模型在保留集上进行了评估,并通过 SHapley Additive explanation (SHAP) 值以人类可解释的形式进行了解释。预测模型在保留集上的多类 AUC=0.80。用于二分类的预测能力产生 AUC=0.83(敏感性=.80,特异性=.77)。对常规治疗无反应的最相关预测因子是失眠症状、年龄较小、焦虑症状、抑郁情绪、失业、自杀意念和抑郁障碍的躯体症状。可以识别出对常规治疗抑郁症无反应的患者,并对其进行潜在下一代治疗的筛查。这些预测因子可能有助于个性化治疗并提高治疗反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/1a2cb8e0989b/41598_2022_9226_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/0f66107cd570/41598_2022_9226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/b109cd7bc23b/41598_2022_9226_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/b330e57e94de/41598_2022_9226_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/ee0518ab3d23/41598_2022_9226_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/1a2cb8e0989b/41598_2022_9226_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/0f66107cd570/41598_2022_9226_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/b109cd7bc23b/41598_2022_9226_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/b330e57e94de/41598_2022_9226_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/ee0518ab3d23/41598_2022_9226_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8564/8971434/1a2cb8e0989b/41598_2022_9226_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting non-response to multimodal day clinic treatment in severely impaired depressed patients: a machine learning approach.预测严重受损的抑郁患者对多模式日间诊所治疗的无反应:一种机器学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 31;12(1):5455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09226-5.
2
Insomnia severity is an indicator of suicidal ideation during a depression clinical trial.失眠严重程度是抑郁临床试验期间自杀意念的一个指标。
Sleep Med. 2010 Oct;11(9):822-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 15.
3
Prediction of near-term increases in suicidal ideation in recently depressed patients with bipolar II disorder using intensive longitudinal data.利用密集纵向数据预测近期患有双相II型障碍的抑郁症患者自杀意念的近期增加情况。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:363-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.054. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
4
Objectively Assessed Sleep Variability as an Acute Warning Sign of Suicidal Ideation in a Longitudinal Evaluation of Young Adults at High Suicide Risk.在对高自杀风险的年轻成年人进行纵向评估时,客观评估的睡眠变异性作为自杀意念的急性预警信号。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;78(6):e678-e687. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m11193.
5
The efficacy and tolerability of once-daily controlled-release trazodone for depressed mood, anxiety, insomnia, and suicidality in major depressive disorder.每日一次的控释曲唑酮治疗重度抑郁症患者的情绪低落、焦虑、失眠及自杀倾向的疗效与耐受性
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2009;42(4):5-22.
6
Longitudinal course of depression scores with and without insomnia in non-depressed individuals: a 6-year follow-up longitudinal study in a Korean cohort.非抑郁个体中伴或不伴失眠的抑郁评分的纵向病程:一项韩国队列的 6 年随访纵向研究。
Sleep. 2013 Mar 1;36(3):369-76. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2452.
7
Insomnia is associated with suicide attempt in middle-aged and older adults with depression.失眠与患有抑郁症的中老年成年人的自杀企图有关。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Apr;28(4):613-9. doi: 10.1017/S104161021500174X. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
8
Depression Prediction by Using Ecological Momentary Assessment, Actiwatch Data, and Machine Learning: Observational Study on Older Adults Living Alone.使用生态瞬时评估、Actiwatch 数据和机器学习预测抑郁:独居老年人的观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 16;7(10):e14149. doi: 10.2196/14149.
9
[Residual symptoms after a treated major depressive disorder: in practice ambulatory observatory carried out of city].[重度抑郁症治疗后的残留症状:在城市进行的门诊观察实践]
Encephale. 2003 Sep-Oct;29(5):438-44.
10
The prediction of suicidal intent in depressed patients.抑郁症患者自杀意图的预测。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Oct;96(4):254-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10160.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Multi-Modal Biosensing Approaches for Depression: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.抑郁症多模态生物传感方法的整合:现状、挑战与未来展望
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;25(15):4858. doi: 10.3390/s25154858.
2
The application of artificial intelligence in insomnia, anxiety, and depression: A bibliometric analysis.人工智能在失眠、焦虑和抑郁中的应用:一项文献计量分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 2;11:20552076251324456. doi: 10.1177/20552076251324456. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Effects of an Artificial Intelligence Platform for Behavioral Interventions on Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic prediction of psychological treatment outcomes: development and validation of a prediction model using routinely collected symptom data.动态预测心理治疗结果:使用常规收集的症状数据开发和验证预测模型。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Apr;3(4):e231-e240. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00018-2.
2
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of 21 Antidepressant Drugs for the Acute Treatment of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.21种抗抑郁药物治疗成人重度抑郁症急性发作的疗效与可接受性比较:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ). 2018 Oct;16(4):420-429. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.16407. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
人工智能行为干预平台对抑郁和焦虑症状的影响:随机临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 10;25:e46781. doi: 10.2196/46781.
Predicting cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in the outpatient sector based on clinical routine data: A machine learning approach.
基于临床常规数据预测门诊患者认知行为治疗的疗效:一种机器学习方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103530. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103530. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
4
Personalized prognostic prediction of treatment outcome for depressed patients in a naturalistic psychiatric hospital setting: A comparison of machine learning approaches.自然环境下精神病院抑郁患者治疗结果的个体化预后预测:机器学习方法的比较。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Jan;88(1):25-38. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000451.
5
Treatment response classes in major depressive disorder identified by model-based clustering and validated by clinical prediction models.基于模型聚类识别的重度抑郁症治疗反应类别,并通过临床预测模型验证。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 5;9(1):187. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0524-4.
6
Social and Mental Health Care Integration: The Leading Edge.社会与精神卫生保健整合:前沿领域
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):881-882. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1148.
7
Latent Profiles of Cognitive and Interpersonal Risk Factors for Adolescent Depression and Implications for Personalized Treatment.青少年抑郁的认知和人际风险因素的潜在特征及其对个性化治疗的影响。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2019 Dec;47(12):1957-1967. doi: 10.1007/s10802-019-00552-3.
8
Machine Learning for Prediction of Posttraumatic Stress and Resilience Following Trauma: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Recent Advances.创伤后应激和韧性预测的机器学习:基本概念和最新进展概述。
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Apr;32(2):215-225. doi: 10.1002/jts.22384. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Severity and Variability of Depression Symptoms Predicting Suicide Attempt in High-Risk Individuals.抑郁症状的严重程度和变异性预测高危个体的自杀企图。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):603-613. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4513.
10
Predicting the naturalistic course of depression from a wide range of clinical, psychological, and biological data: a machine learning approach.从广泛的临床、心理和生物学数据预测抑郁症的自然病程:一种机器学习方法。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 5;8(1):241. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0289-1.