General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Gert Persson Läkarkonsult, Västra Götalands län, Sweden.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Mar;40(1):129-138. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2057035. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
To evaluate the one-year-effect of a single visit to a health coach on perceived health and exercise level in 50-year-old citizens.
One factor design randomised controlled trial.
Participants were randomly selected from the Swedish Population Register.
50-year-old residents of the town of Alingsås, Sweden ( = 105).
The intervention group ( = 52) received a single one-hour visit to a health coach. The control group ( = 53) received no intervention.
Change over 12 months in the SF-36 dimensions physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health, physical component summary and mental component summary. Reported health transition at follow-up. Change in exercise level.
The control group changed their perceived health more favourable than the intervention group in the following dimensions of the SF-36; general health ( = 0.0055-0.025), role-emotional ( = 0.034-0.040) and mental component summary ( = 0.033-0.073).
A single visit to a health coach does not improve perceived health or exercise-level in 50-year-old citizens. On the contrary it may make perceived health worse.Key pointsResearch on health coaching has emerged in the last 20 years, but is diverse and the characteristics of a successful health coaching intervention are still unknown.There is a lack of randomised controlled trials evaluating long-term effectiveness of health coaching.This randomised controlled trial concludes that a single visit to a health coach does not improve, but rather impairs, perceived health in 50-year olds.
评估健康教练单次访问对 50 岁市民感知健康和锻炼水平的一年影响。
单因素设计随机对照试验。
参与者从瑞典人口登记处随机选择。
瑞典阿尔辛斯市的 50 岁居民( = 105)。
干预组( = 52)接受了一次与健康教练的一小时访问。对照组( = 53)未接受干预。
SF-36 维度在 12 个月内的变化,包括身体功能、生理职能、身体疼痛、一般健康、活力、社会功能、情绪角色、心理健康、生理成分综合评分和心理成分综合评分。随访时报告健康转变。锻炼水平的变化。
与干预组相比,对照组在 SF-36 的以下维度中对感知健康的改变更为有利:一般健康( = 0.0055-0.025)、情绪角色( = 0.034-0.040)和心理成分综合评分( = 0.033-0.073)。
健康教练的单次访问并不能改善 50 岁市民的感知健康或锻炼水平。相反,它可能会使感知健康恶化。
健康教练的研究在过去 20 年中出现,但具有多样性,成功的健康教练干预的特征仍不清楚。缺乏评估健康教练长期效果的随机对照试验。本随机对照试验的结论是,健康教练的单次访问并不能改善,反而会损害 50 岁人群的感知健康。