Godfrey E, Winn W, Keathley J D
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Nov;5(4):313-6. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90034-9.
Three hundred thirty-two women, aged 18-30 yr. attending two clinics in Burlington Vermont were screened for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis by two methods. Microtrak Direct Test (SYVA) and cell culture. The overall sensitivity for Microtrak compared with culture was 75% (18 of 24), the specificity was 99.7% (307 of 308), the positive predictive value was 94.7% (18 of 19), and the negative predictive value was 98.1% (307 of 313). Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in this population was estimated to be 7.2% (95% confidence intervals 4.4-10.0). The results from this study suggest that Microtrak is less sensitive when used in unselected patient groups from populations of lower prevalence, in contrast to higher sensitivities previously reported.
对佛蒙特州伯灵顿市两家诊所的332名年龄在18至30岁之间的女性,采用两种方法筛查沙眼衣原体感染。这两种方法分别是Microtrak直接检测法(SYVA公司)和细胞培养法。与培养法相比,Microtrak的总体灵敏度为75%(24例中的18例),特异度为99.7%(308例中的307例),阳性预测值为94.7%(19例中的18例),阴性预测值为98.1%(313例中的307例)。该人群中沙眼衣原体的患病率估计为7.2%(95%置信区间为4.4 - 10.0)。本研究结果表明,与先前报道的较高灵敏度相比,在患病率较低人群的未选择患者组中使用时,Microtrak的灵敏度较低。