Olsen M A, Sambol A R, Bohnert V A
Department of Medical Microbiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Neb.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Feb;119(2):153-6.
An enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen, Syva Microtrak, was compared with Abbott Chlamydiazyme to evaluate the performance of the Microtrak assay in the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in women. Duplicate endocervical swabs from 550 women were tested by both methods, and discrepancies were resolved by direct immunofluorescence on pelleted material from the collection tubes. Forty-six specimens were positive by the Syva Microtrak assay (resolved sensitivity, 95%), and 34 specimens were positive by the Chlamydiazyme assay (resolved sensitivity, 79%). The results from this small study suggest that the Syva Microtrak enzyme immunoassay is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme for the detection of chlamydial antigen in endocervical specimens. This test should be useful for the diagnosis of chlamydial genital tract infection in females.
为评估Syva Microtrak酶免疫测定法在诊断女性衣原体生殖道感染中的性能,将其与雅培衣原体酶免疫测定法(Abbott Chlamydiazyme)进行了比较,以检测沙眼衣原体抗原。采用这两种方法对来自550名女性的双份宫颈拭子进行检测,通过对收集管中沉淀物质进行直接免疫荧光检测来解决差异问题。Syva Microtrak测定法有46份标本呈阳性(确诊敏感性为95%),衣原体酶免疫测定法有34份标本呈阳性(确诊敏感性为79%)。这项小型研究的结果表明,Syva Microtrak酶免疫测定法在检测宫颈标本中的衣原体抗原方面比衣原体酶免疫测定法更敏感。该检测方法对于诊断女性衣原体生殖道感染应是有用的。