Department of Nursing, Chengde Nursing Vocational College, Chengde, Hebei Province, P.R. China.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Mar;26(6):2085-2097. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202203_28356.
Robot-assisted prostatectomy is commonly performed for the management of prostate cancer. The literature has noted that prostate cancer patients are often prone to increased risk for thromboembolic complications. Normally, such situations call for long-term anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy. However, the administration of these drugs is usually contraindicated prior to surgical intervention to limit intra- and post-operative hemorrhagic complications. Despite some recent evidence that continued administration of anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs does not impact intra- and post-operative outcomes, no consensus in the literature exists concerning the influence of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drug administration on intra- and post-operative outcomes for robot-assisted prostatectomy. Our aim is to evaluate the influence of perioperative administration of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy in terms of bleeding complication incidence, blood transfusion rate, blood loss, and hospital stay duration.
The academic literature was systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE). Through this, we conducted a random-effect meta-analysis to evaluate the influence of perioperative administration of anticoagulant and antiplatelet drugs in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy in terms of bleeding complication incidence, blood transfusion rate, blood loss, and hospital stay duration.
From 993 studies, eight eligible studies containing 2516 patients (mean age: 65.7± 3.6 years) were selected for inclusion. Meta-analysis revealed a higher bleeding complication prevalence for patients receiving anticoagulants (event rate: 10.6%) compared to those receiving antiplatelets (3.4%). We also noted longer hospital stay durations for anticoagulant group patients (Hedge's g: -0.30) compared to antiplatelet group counterparts (g: -0.01).
The study provides preliminary evidence that anticoagulant drug administration results in higher bleeding complication incidence and longer hospital stay durations in patients undergoing robot-assisted prostatectomy relative to antiplatelet drug administration.
机器人辅助前列腺切除术常用于治疗前列腺癌。文献指出,前列腺癌患者往往容易发生血栓栓塞并发症的风险增加。通常情况下,这种情况需要长期抗凝/抗血小板治疗。然而,在手术干预之前,这些药物的使用通常被禁忌,以限制术中及术后出血并发症。尽管最近有一些证据表明,继续使用抗凝/抗血小板药物不会影响术中及术后结果,但文献中尚未就抗凝和抗血小板药物的使用对机器人辅助前列腺切除术的术中及术后结果的影响达成共识。我们的目的是评估围手术期使用抗凝和抗血小板药物对机器人辅助前列腺切除术患者出血并发症发生率、输血率、出血量和住院时间的影响。
根据 PRISMA 指南,系统地在五个数据库(Web of Science、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Scopus 和 MEDLINE)中搜索学术文献。通过随机效应荟萃分析,我们评估了围手术期使用抗凝和抗血小板药物对机器人辅助前列腺切除术患者出血并发症发生率、输血率、出血量和住院时间的影响。
从 993 项研究中,有 8 项符合条件的研究共纳入 2516 名患者(平均年龄:65.7±3.6 岁)。荟萃分析显示,接受抗凝剂治疗的患者出血并发症发生率较高(事件率:10.6%),而接受抗血小板治疗的患者发生率较低(3.4%)。我们还注意到,抗凝剂组患者的住院时间较长(Hedge's g:-0.30),而抗血小板组患者的住院时间较短(g:-0.01)。
该研究初步表明,与抗血小板药物相比,抗凝药物治疗可导致机器人辅助前列腺切除术患者出血并发症发生率增加和住院时间延长。