• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

硝酸银涂层与标准留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液:SWIFT 随机试验。

Silver Nitrate-coated versus Standard Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusions: The SWIFT Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Oct;19(10):1722-1729. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1301OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1301OC
PMID:35363591
Abstract

Tunneled, indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) have been demonstrated to be an effective method of managing malignant pleural effusions. However, they allow pleurodesis and can therefore be removed in only a subset of patients. A novel, silver nitrate-coated IPC was developed with the intention of creating a rapid, effective chemical pleurodesis to allow more frequent and earlier catheter removal. This study represents the pivotal clinical trial evaluating that catheter versus the standard IPC. To compare the efficacy of a novel silver nitrate-eluting indwelling pleural catheter (SNCIPC) with that of a standard, uncoated catheter. The SWIFT [A Pivotal Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Study Comparing the Silver Nitrate-Coated Indwelling Pleural Catheter (SNCIPC) to the Uncoated PleurX Pleural Catheter for the Management of Symptomatic, Recurrent, Malignant Pleural Effusions] trial was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, patient-blind trial. Central randomization occurred according to a computer-generated schedule, stratified by site. Recruitment was from 17 secondary or tertiary care hospitals in the United States and 3 in the United Kingdom and included adult patients with malignant pleural effusion needing drainage, without evidence of lung entrapment or significant loculation. The intervention group underwent insertion of an SNCIPC with maximal fluid drainage, followed by a tapering drainage schedule. The control group received a standard, uncoated catheter. Follow-up was conducted until 90 days. The primary outcome measure was pleurodesis efficacy, measured by fluid drainage, at 30 days. A total of 119 patients were randomized. Five withdrew before receiving treatment, leaving 114 (77 SNCIPC, 37 standard IPC) for analysis. The mean age was 66 years (standard deviation, 11). More patients in the SNCIPC group were inpatients (39% vs. 14%;  = 0.009). For the primary outcome, pleurodesis rates were 12 (32%) of 37 in the control group and 17 (22%) of 77 in the SNCIPC group (rate difference, -0.10; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.09). Median time to pleurodesis was 11 days (interquartile range, 9 to 23) in the control group and 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 15) in the SNCIPC group. No significant difference in treatment-related adverse event rates was noted between groups. The SNCIPC did not improve pleurodesis efficacy compared with a standard IPC. This study does not support the wider use of the SNCIPC device. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02649894).

摘要

经皮留置胸膜腔导管(IPC)已被证明是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效方法。然而,它们允许发生胸膜固定术,因此只能在一部分患者中移除。一种新型的硝酸银涂层 IPC 被开发出来,目的是快速有效地进行化学性胸膜固定术,以便更频繁地更早地移除导管。本研究代表了评估该导管与标准 IPC 的关键性临床试验。

比较新型硝酸银洗脱留置胸膜腔导管(SNCIPC)与标准未涂层导管的疗效。

SWIFT [一项多中心、随机、对照、单盲研究,比较银涂层留置胸膜腔导管(SNCIPC)与未涂层 PleurX 胸膜导管治疗症状性、复发性恶性胸腔积液]试验是一项多中心、平行组、随机、对照、患者盲法试验。根据计算机生成的时间表进行中心随机化,按地点分层。招募来自美国 17 家二级或三级保健医院和英国 3 家医院,包括需要引流的恶性胸腔积液的成年患者,无肺嵌塞或明显分隔的证据。干预组接受 SNCIPC 插入,最大程度引流液体,然后进行逐渐减少引流的方案。对照组接受标准未涂层导管。随访至 90 天。主要结局指标为 30 天时的胸腔固定术疗效,通过液体引流来衡量。

共有 119 名患者被随机分配。5 名患者在接受治疗前退出,114 名(77 名 SNCIPC,37 名标准 IPC)患者接受了分析。平均年龄为 66 岁(标准差为 11)。SNCIPC 组中有更多的住院患者(39% vs. 14%;=0.009)。对于主要结局,对照组的胸腔固定术发生率为 37 例中的 12 例(32%),SNCIPC 组为 77 例中的 17 例(22%)(发生率差异,-0.10;95%置信区间,-0.30 至 0.09)。对照组的中位胸腔固定术时间为 11 天(四分位距,9 至 23),SNCIPC 组为 4 天(四分位距,2 至 15)。两组之间未见治疗相关不良事件发生率的显著差异。

SNCIPC 并未改善与标准 IPC 的胸腔固定术疗效。本研究不支持更广泛地使用 SNCIPC 设备。该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT02649894)。

相似文献

1
Silver Nitrate-coated versus Standard Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusions: The SWIFT Randomized Trial.硝酸银涂层与标准留置胸膜导管治疗恶性胸腔积液:SWIFT 随机试验。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Oct;19(10):1722-1729. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1301OC.
2
Local and systemic effects of a silver nitrate coated indwelling pleural catheter in an animal model of pleurodesis.硝酸银涂层留置胸膜导管在胸膜固定术动物模型中的局部和全身效应
Exp Lung Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;43(9-10):388-394. doi: 10.1080/01902148.2017.1384865. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
3
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial.留置胸腔导管与胸腔引流管和滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液呼吸困难的效果:TIME2 随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2383-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5535.
4
Australasian Malignant PLeural Effusion (AMPLE)-3 trial: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised study comparing indwelling pleural catheter (±talc pleurodesis) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for management of malignant pleural effusion.澳大利亚恶性胸腔积液(AMPLE)-3 试验:一项多中心随机研究的研究方案,比较留置胸腔导管(±滑石粉胸膜固定术)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗恶性胸腔积液。
Trials. 2022 Jun 27;23(1):530. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06405-7.
5
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
6
Effect of an Indwelling Pleural Catheter vs Talc Pleurodesis on Hospitalization Days in Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion: The AMPLE Randomized Clinical Trial.留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术对恶性胸腔积液患者住院天数的影响:AMPLE随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Nov 21;318(19):1903-1912. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17426.
7
Indwelling pleural catheter versus talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: a meta-analysis.留置胸膜腔导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2020 Aug;37(4):541-549. doi: 10.1007/s10585-020-10042-2. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
A randomized controlled trial comparing indwelling pleural catheters with talc pleurodesis (NVALT-14).一项比较留置胸膜导管与滑石粉胸膜固定术的随机对照试验(NVALT - 14)。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Jun;108:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Outpatient Talc Administration by Indwelling Pleural Catheter for Malignant Effusion.门诊经留置胸腔导管滑石粉给药治疗恶性胸腔积液。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1313-1322. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716883.
10
Indwelling Pleural Catheter versus Pleurodesis for Malignant Pleural Effusions. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.留置胸膜导管与胸膜固定术治疗恶性胸腔积液。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Jan;16(1):124-131. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201807-495OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Updates in the management of malignant pleural effusion: a clinical practice review.恶性胸腔积液管理的最新进展:临床实践综述
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Aug 31;17(8):6283-6295. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2025-113. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
The Evolution of the Indwelling Pleural Catheter.留置胸膜导管的演变
Pulm Ther. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1007/s41030-025-00300-7.
3
Malignant Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Treatment-Up-to-Date Perspective.恶性胸腔积液:诊断与治疗——最新视角。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Nov 2;31(11):6867-6878. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31110507.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes in Pleural Effusions: A Systematic Review.胸腔积液患者报告的结局:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jan 17;16(1):e52430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52430. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Malignant pleural effusion: current understanding and therapeutic approach.恶性胸腔积液:当前的认识和治疗方法。
Respir Res. 2024 Jan 19;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02684-7.
6
Malignant Pleural Effusions: Updates in Diagnosis and Management.恶性胸腔积液:诊断与治疗的新进展
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 31;13(1):115. doi: 10.3390/life13010115.
7
Indwelling pleural catheter for malignant pleural effusion - Are we ready?用于恶性胸腔积液的留置胸膜导管——我们准备好了吗?
Lung India. 2022 Sep-Oct;39(5):391-392. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_412_22.
8
Malignant pleural effusion: Updates in diagnosis, management and current challenges.恶性胸腔积液:诊断、管理及当前挑战的最新进展
Front Oncol. 2022 Nov 17;12:1053574. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1053574. eCollection 2022.