Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Oct;19(10):1722-1729. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202111-1301OC.
Tunneled, indwelling pleural catheters (IPCs) have been demonstrated to be an effective method of managing malignant pleural effusions. However, they allow pleurodesis and can therefore be removed in only a subset of patients. A novel, silver nitrate-coated IPC was developed with the intention of creating a rapid, effective chemical pleurodesis to allow more frequent and earlier catheter removal. This study represents the pivotal clinical trial evaluating that catheter versus the standard IPC. To compare the efficacy of a novel silver nitrate-eluting indwelling pleural catheter (SNCIPC) with that of a standard, uncoated catheter. The SWIFT [A Pivotal Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blinded Study Comparing the Silver Nitrate-Coated Indwelling Pleural Catheter (SNCIPC) to the Uncoated PleurX Pleural Catheter for the Management of Symptomatic, Recurrent, Malignant Pleural Effusions] trial was a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, patient-blind trial. Central randomization occurred according to a computer-generated schedule, stratified by site. Recruitment was from 17 secondary or tertiary care hospitals in the United States and 3 in the United Kingdom and included adult patients with malignant pleural effusion needing drainage, without evidence of lung entrapment or significant loculation. The intervention group underwent insertion of an SNCIPC with maximal fluid drainage, followed by a tapering drainage schedule. The control group received a standard, uncoated catheter. Follow-up was conducted until 90 days. The primary outcome measure was pleurodesis efficacy, measured by fluid drainage, at 30 days. A total of 119 patients were randomized. Five withdrew before receiving treatment, leaving 114 (77 SNCIPC, 37 standard IPC) for analysis. The mean age was 66 years (standard deviation, 11). More patients in the SNCIPC group were inpatients (39% vs. 14%; = 0.009). For the primary outcome, pleurodesis rates were 12 (32%) of 37 in the control group and 17 (22%) of 77 in the SNCIPC group (rate difference, -0.10; 95% confidence interval, -0.30 to 0.09). Median time to pleurodesis was 11 days (interquartile range, 9 to 23) in the control group and 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 15) in the SNCIPC group. No significant difference in treatment-related adverse event rates was noted between groups. The SNCIPC did not improve pleurodesis efficacy compared with a standard IPC. This study does not support the wider use of the SNCIPC device. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02649894).
经皮留置胸膜腔导管(IPC)已被证明是治疗恶性胸腔积液的有效方法。然而,它们允许发生胸膜固定术,因此只能在一部分患者中移除。一种新型的硝酸银涂层 IPC 被开发出来,目的是快速有效地进行化学性胸膜固定术,以便更频繁地更早地移除导管。本研究代表了评估该导管与标准 IPC 的关键性临床试验。
比较新型硝酸银洗脱留置胸膜腔导管(SNCIPC)与标准未涂层导管的疗效。
SWIFT [一项多中心、随机、对照、单盲研究,比较银涂层留置胸膜腔导管(SNCIPC)与未涂层 PleurX 胸膜导管治疗症状性、复发性恶性胸腔积液]试验是一项多中心、平行组、随机、对照、患者盲法试验。根据计算机生成的时间表进行中心随机化,按地点分层。招募来自美国 17 家二级或三级保健医院和英国 3 家医院,包括需要引流的恶性胸腔积液的成年患者,无肺嵌塞或明显分隔的证据。干预组接受 SNCIPC 插入,最大程度引流液体,然后进行逐渐减少引流的方案。对照组接受标准未涂层导管。随访至 90 天。主要结局指标为 30 天时的胸腔固定术疗效,通过液体引流来衡量。
共有 119 名患者被随机分配。5 名患者在接受治疗前退出,114 名(77 名 SNCIPC,37 名标准 IPC)患者接受了分析。平均年龄为 66 岁(标准差为 11)。SNCIPC 组中有更多的住院患者(39% vs. 14%;=0.009)。对于主要结局,对照组的胸腔固定术发生率为 37 例中的 12 例(32%),SNCIPC 组为 77 例中的 17 例(22%)(发生率差异,-0.10;95%置信区间,-0.30 至 0.09)。对照组的中位胸腔固定术时间为 11 天(四分位距,9 至 23),SNCIPC 组为 4 天(四分位距,2 至 15)。两组之间未见治疗相关不良事件发生率的显著差异。
SNCIPC 并未改善与标准 IPC 的胸腔固定术疗效。本研究不支持更广泛地使用 SNCIPC 设备。该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT02649894)。