Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Joan and Sanford I. Weill Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Jul 1;206(1):25-33. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202111-2630OC.
Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are an important endpoint in multinational clinical treatment trials, but the observed event rate is often lower than anticipated and appears to vary between countries. We investigated whether systematic differences in national exacerbation rates might explain this observed variation. We reviewed data from three large multicenter international randomized trials conducted over an 18-year period with different designs and clinical severities of COPD, comparing bronchodilator and/or inhaled corticosteroids with bronchodilators alone and/or placebo. Exacerbations were defined by antibiotic and/or oral corticosteroid use (moderate) or need for hospitalization (severe). We calculated crude exacerbation rates in the 30 countries contributing 30 or more patients to at least two trials. We grouped data by exacerbation rate based on their first study contribution. For the 29,756 patients in 41 countries analyzed, the mean exacerbation rate was two- to threefold different between the highest and lowest tertiles of the recruiting nations. These differences were not explained by demographic features, study protocol, or reported exacerbation history at enrollment. Of the 18 countries contributing to all trials, half of those in the highest and half in the lowest tertiles of exacerbation history remained in these groups across trials. Severe exacerbations showed a different rank order internationally. Countries contributing to COPD trials differ consistently in their reporting of healthcare-defined exacerbations. These differences help explain why large studies have been needed to show differences between treatments that decrease exacerbation risk.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的恶化是多国临床治疗试验中的一个重要终点,但观察到的事件发生率往往低于预期,而且似乎在国家之间有所不同。我们研究了国家恶化率的系统差异是否可以解释这种观察到的变异。我们回顾了三项在 18 年期间进行的、具有不同设计和 COPD 临床严重程度的大型多中心国际随机试验的数据,比较了支气管扩张剂和/或吸入皮质类固醇与支气管扩张剂单独使用和/或安慰剂的效果。恶化的定义是使用抗生素和/或口服皮质类固醇(中度)或需要住院治疗(重度)。我们计算了至少有 30 名患者参加了两项以上试验的 30 个国家的粗恶化率。我们根据首次研究的贡献将数据按恶化率分组。对于在 41 个国家分析的 29756 名患者,招募国家恶化率最高和最低三分位数之间的平均恶化率相差两到三倍。这些差异不能用人口统计学特征、研究方案或登记时报告的恶化史来解释。在参与所有试验的 18 个国家中,有一半的国家在恶化史的最高和最低三分位数中,在整个试验中仍处于这两个组中。重度恶化在国际上表现出不同的等级顺序。参与 COPD 试验的国家在报告医疗保健定义的恶化方面存在一致的差异。这些差异有助于解释为什么需要进行大型研究来显示降低恶化风险的治疗方法之间的差异。