• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将路标指引整合到全科医学中的挑战:初级保健中护理导航和社会处方的利益相关者定性观点。

The challenges of integrating signposting into general practice: qualitative stakeholder perspectives on care navigation and social prescribing in primary care.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.

Sheffield Methods Institute, Interdisciplinary Centre of the Social Sciences, University of Sheffield, 219 Portobello, S1 4DP, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 1;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01669-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-022-01669-z
PMID:35365072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8972897/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A national policy focus in England to address general practice workforce issues has led to a commitment to employ significant numbers of non-general practitioner (GP) roles to redistribute workload. This paper focuses on two such roles: the care navigation (CN) and social prescribing link worker (SPLW) roles, which both aim to introduce 'active signposting' into primary care, to direct patients to the right professional/services at the right time and free up GP time. There is a lack of research exploring staff views of how these roles are being planned and operationalised into general practice and how signposting is being integrated into primary care.

METHODS

The design uses in-depth qualitative methods to explore a wide range of stakeholder staff views. We generated a purposive sample of 34 respondents who took part in 17 semi-structured interviews and one focus group (service leads, role holders and host general practice staff). We analysed data using a Template Analysis approach.

RESULTS

Three key themes highlight the challenges of operationalising signposting into general practice: 1) role perception - signposting was made challenging by the way both roles were perceived by others (e.g. among the public, patients and general practice staff) and highlighted inherent tensions in the expressed aims of the policy of active signposting; 2) role preparedness - a lack of training meant that some receptionist staff felt unprepared to take on the CN role as expected and raised patient safety issues; for SPLW staff, training affected the consistency of service offer across an area; 3) integration and co-ordination of roles - a lack of planning and co-ordination across components of the health and care system challenged the success of integrating signposting into general practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides new insights from staff stakeholder perspectives into the challenges of integrating signposting into general practice, and highlights key factors affecting the success of signposting in practice. Clarity of role purpose and remit (including resolving tensions inherent the dual aims of 'active signposting'), appropriate training and skill development for role holders and adequate communication and engagement between stakeholders/partnership working across services, are required to enable successful integration of signposting into general practice.

摘要

背景

英格兰的一项国家政策重点是解决全科医生劳动力问题,因此承诺雇用大量非全科医生(GP)角色来重新分配工作量。本文重点介绍了这两个角色:护理导航员(CN)和社会处方联络工作者(SPLW),他们的目标都是在初级保健中引入“主动转介”,以便在适当的时间将患者引导至合适的专业人员/服务,从而释放全科医生的时间。目前缺乏研究来探索工作人员对这些角色如何被规划并纳入全科实践,以及转介如何被整合到初级保健中的看法。

方法

该设计使用深入的定性方法来探索广泛的利益相关者工作人员的观点。我们生成了一个有目的的样本,包括 34 名受访者,他们参加了 17 次半结构化访谈和一次焦点小组(服务负责人、角色扮演者和接待全科医生)。我们使用模板分析方法分析数据。

结果

三个关键主题突出了将转介纳入全科实践的挑战:1)角色认知——由于其他人(例如公众、患者和全科医生工作人员)对这两个角色的看法,转介变得具有挑战性,并且突出了积极转介政策的既定目标所固有的紧张关系;2)角色准备——缺乏培训意味着一些接待员工作人员觉得自己没有准备好按照预期承担 CN 角色,这引发了患者安全问题;对于 SPLW 工作人员来说,培训影响了整个地区服务提供的一致性;3)角色的整合和协调——卫生和保健系统各组成部分之间缺乏规划和协调,这对将转介成功纳入全科实践提出了挑战。

结论

这项研究从工作人员利益相关者的角度提供了有关将转介纳入全科实践的挑战的新见解,并强调了影响实践中转介成功的关键因素。明确角色目的和职责(包括解决“主动转介”双重目标固有的紧张关系)、为角色扮演者提供适当的培训和技能发展,以及在服务之间进行充分的沟通和利益相关者参与/合作,这些都是将转介成功纳入全科实践所必需的。

相似文献

1
The challenges of integrating signposting into general practice: qualitative stakeholder perspectives on care navigation and social prescribing in primary care.将路标指引整合到全科医学中的挑战:初级保健中护理导航和社会处方的利益相关者定性观点。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Apr 1;23(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01669-z.
2
Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three 'new' non-medical roles in English primary care.全科医生技能组合的变化:英国初级保健中三种“新”非医疗角色的定性比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e489-e498. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704117. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
3
Digital First Primary Care for those with multiple long-term conditions: a rapid review of the views of stakeholders.针对多种慢性病患者的数字优先初级保健:利益相关者观点的快速综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(21):1-68. doi: 10.3310/AWBT4827.
4
Challenges and enablers to implementation of the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in primary care: a qualitative study.基层医疗中实施额外角色报销计划的挑战与推动因素:一项定性研究
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e315-e322. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0433. Print 2024 May.
5
Stakeholder views of podiatry services in the UK for people living with arthritis: a qualitative study.英国关节炎患者足部医学服务的利益相关者观点:一项定性研究。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Sep 24;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00427-7.
6
7
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
8
A qualitative study of perceptions of senior health service staff as to factors influencing the development of Advanced Clinical Practice roles in mental health services.一项关于高级卫生服务人员对影响精神卫生服务中高级临床实践角色发展因素的看法的定性研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Oct;28(5):829-837. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12792. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
9
Evaluation of different models of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.评价在急诊科工作或合作的全科医生的不同模式:混合方法现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(10):1-152. doi: 10.3310/JWQZ5348.
10

引用本文的文献

1
What knowledge and skills are needed for community volunteers to take on a signposting role in community-based palliative care? A qualitative study.社区志愿者在社区姑息治疗中承担指引角色需要具备哪些知识和技能?一项定性研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jun 11;19:26323524251334184. doi: 10.1177/26323524251334184. eCollection 2025.
2
Social prescribing of cultural opportunities to support health and wellbeing: the importance of language, community engagement, and inclusion in developing local approaches.通过提供文化活动机会进行社会处方以促进健康和福祉:语言、社区参与以及在制定地方方法时纳入这些因素的重要性。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 May 8;26(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02835-9.
3
Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.虚拟护理在初级保健中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 14;27:e55007. doi: 10.2196/55007.
4
Enhancing access to primary care is critical to the future of an equitable health service: using process visualisation to understand the impact of national policy in the UK.增加初级医疗服务的可及性对公平的医疗服务的未来至关重要:利用流程可视化来理解英国国家政策的影响。
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jan 27;4:1499847. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1499847. eCollection 2024.
5
Understanding How, Why and for Whom Link Work Interventions Promote Access in Community Healthcare Settings in the United Kingdom: A Realist Review.理解链接工作干预措施如何、为何以及为谁在英国社区医疗保健环境中促进获得服务:一项现实主义综述。
Health Expect. 2024 Dec;27(6):e70090. doi: 10.1111/hex.70090.
6
Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.全科医疗接待员临床导向角色的影响:一项叙事性综合的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e159-e165. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228. Print 2025 Mar.
7
Guides for facilitating the implementation and evaluation of social prescribing: lessons from the "Access to Resources in the Community" model.促进社会处方实施和评估的指南:来自“社区资源获取”模式的经验教训。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2024 Sep;44(9):397-400. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.9.07.
8
Patients' views on primary care multidisciplinary teams in Scotland: a mixed-methods evaluation.苏格兰患者对基层医疗多学科团队的看法:一项混合方法评估。
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0200. Print 2024 Oct.
9
PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map.方案:社会处方对老年人的影响:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 29;20(2):e1382. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1382. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Implementing the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme in seven English Primary Care Networks: a qualitative study.在七个英格兰基层医疗网络中实施额外角色补偿计划:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e323-e329. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0216. Print 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Prescribing - Transforming the Relationship between Physicians and Their Patients.社会处方——重塑医患关系
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):97-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1917060.
2
Applying critical systems thinking to social prescribing: a relational model of stakeholder "buy-in".运用批判系统思维进行社会处方:利益相关者“认同”的关系模型。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 24;20(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05443-8.
3
Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review.通过将人们与当地资源联系起来,在初级保健中支持社会处方:一项实际主义综述。
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1510-7.
4
New horizons in supporting older people's health and wellbeing: is social prescribing a way forward?支持老年人健康与福祉的新视野:社会处方是前进的方向吗?
Age Ageing. 2020 Apr 27;49(3):319-326. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa016.
5
Effects of participating in community assets on quality of life and costs of care: longitudinal cohort study of older people in England.参与社区资产对生活质量和护理成本的影响:对英格兰老年人的纵向队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 6;10(2):e033186. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033186.
6
What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review.社会处方的实施途径有哪些?针对哪些人群?在什么情况下有效?一项实际情况综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):309-324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
7
Current understanding and implementation of 'care navigation' across England: a cross-sectional study of NHS clinical commissioning groups.当前英格兰对“护理导航”的理解和实施情况:对英国国家医疗服务体系临床委员会的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e675-e681. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705569. Print 2019 Oct.
8
Skill-mix change in general practice: a qualitative comparison of three 'new' non-medical roles in English primary care.全科医生技能组合的变化:英国初级保健中三种“新”非医疗角色的定性比较。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Jul;69(684):e489-e498. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X704117. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
9
Evaluability assessments as an approach to examining social prescribing.评估可评估性作为一种考察社会处方的方法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jul;27(4):1085-1094. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12726. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
10
Social Prescribing in the U.S. and England: Emerging Interventions to Address Patients' Social Needs.美国和英国的社会处方:满足患者社会需求的新兴干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 May;54(5):715-718. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.039. Epub 2018 Mar 15.