• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Current understanding and implementation of 'care navigation' across England: a cross-sectional study of NHS clinical commissioning groups.当前英格兰对“护理导航”的理解和实施情况:对英国国家医疗服务体系临床委员会的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e675-e681. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705569. Print 2019 Oct.
2
Impact of a social prescribing intervention in North East England on adults with type 2 diabetes: the SPRING_NE multimethod study.英格兰东北部社会处方干预对 2 型糖尿病成人的影响:SPRING_NE 多方法研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Mar;11(2):1-185. doi: 10.3310/AQXC8219.
3
General practitioners' views of clinically led commissioning: cross-sectional survey in England.全科医生对临床主导的医疗服务委托的看法:英格兰的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 8;7(6):e015464. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015464.
4
Primary care-led commissioning: applying lessons from the past to the early development of clinical commissioning groups in England.初级保健主导的委托代理制:从过去的经验中汲取教训,应用于英格兰临床委托代理制的早期发展。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;63(614):e611-9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671597.
5
Commissioning of self-management support for people with long-term conditions: an exploration of commissioning aspirations and processes.为慢性病患者提供自我管理支持的委托:对委托愿望和流程的探索
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 15;6(7):e010853. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010853.
6
Commissioning of specialist palliative care services in England.英国专科姑息治疗服务的委托安排
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;8(1):93-101. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2016-001119. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
7
NHS commissioning in probation in England - on a wing and a prayer.英国缓刑服务中的国民保健服务委托——仅凭一丝希望。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Jan;25(1):137-144. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12283. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
A rapid mixed-methods evaluation of remote home monitoring models during the COVID-19 pandemic in England.英格兰 COVID-19 大流行期间远程家庭监护模式的快速混合方法评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(13):1-151. doi: 10.3310/FVQW4410.
9
Interpreter costs across clinical commissioning groups in England 2017-2018: a cross sectional survey using 'freedom of information' requests.2017 - 2018年英格兰各临床委托小组的口译费用:一项使用“信息自由”请求的横断面调查。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun;70(suppl 1). doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X711377.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Coordinating the Medical Division of Labour: The Travails of Electronic Patient Records in the United Kingdom and United States.协调医疗分工:英国和美国电子病历的艰难历程
Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Sep;47(7):e70085. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.70085.
2
Stakeholder understanding of social prescribing in England: a qualitative study in primary care.利益相关者对英国社会处方的理解:一项初级保健中的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 23;26(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02908-9.
3
Exploring the design and impact of integrated health and social care services for children and young people living in underserved populations: a systematic review.探索为生活在服务不足人群中的儿童和青少年提供的综合健康与社会护理服务的设计与影响:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):1359. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22508-7.
4
Understanding how intermediaries connect adults to community-based physical activity: A qualitative study.了解中介机构如何将成年人与社区体育活动联系起来:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318687. eCollection 2025.
5
Continuity of care in general practice and secondary care: retrospective cohort study.全科医疗与二级医疗保健中的连续性照护:回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0579.
6
Digging for Literature on Tailoring Cultural Offers With and for Older People From Ethnic Minority Groups: A Scoping Review.挖掘关于为少数民族老年人量身定制文化活动及由他们参与的文化活动的文献:一项范围综述
Lifestyle Med (Hoboken). 2025 Jan;6(1):e70004. doi: 10.1002/lim2.70004. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
7
Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.全科医疗接待员临床导向角色的影响:一项叙事性综合的系统评价
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Feb 27;75(752):e159-e165. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0228. Print 2025 Mar.
8
A meta-ethnography of the factors that shape link workers' experiences of social prescribing.社会处方链接工作者体验形成因素的元民族志研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Jul 4;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03478-w.
9
PROTOCOL: Effects of social prescribing for older adults: An evidence and gap map.方案:社会处方对老年人的影响:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 29;20(2):e1382. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1382. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
A rapid review of opportunities and challenges in the implementation of social prescription interventions for addressing the unmet needs of individuals living with long-term chronic conditions.快速回顾实施社会处方干预措施以满足长期慢性病患者未满足需求的机遇与挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 27;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17736-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient uptake and adherence to social prescribing: a qualitative study.患者对社会处方的接受度与依从性:一项定性研究。
BJGP Open. 2018 Aug 8;2(3):bjgpopen18X101598. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101598. eCollection 2018 Oct.
2
Understanding the effectiveness and mechanisms of a social prescribing service: a mixed method analysis.了解社会处方服务的有效性和机制:一项混合方法分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3437-7.
3
Using 'Active Signposting' to streamline general practitioner workload in two London-based practices.在伦敦的两家诊所使用“主动引导”来简化全科医生的工作量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Oct 21;6(2):e000146. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000146. eCollection 2017.
4
Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions.联络专员社会处方改善慢性病患者的健康和福祉:服务使用者认知的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 16;7(7):e015203. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015203.
5
Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence.社会处方:少些空谈,多些实际。对证据的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 7;7(4):e013384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384.

当前英格兰对“护理导航”的理解和实施情况:对英国国家医疗服务体系临床委员会的横断面研究。

Current understanding and implementation of 'care navigation' across England: a cross-sectional study of NHS clinical commissioning groups.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care, University of Oxford, Oxford.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e675-e681. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705569. Print 2019 Oct.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp19X705569
PMID:31501166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6733589/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care navigation is an avenue to link patients to activities or organisations that can help address non-medical needs affecting health and wellbeing. An understanding of how care navigation is being implemented across primary care is lacking.

AIM

To determine how 'care navigation' is interpreted and currently implemented by clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional study involving CCGs in England.

METHOD

A questionnaire was sent to all CCGs inviting them to comment on who provided care navigation, the type of patients for whom care navigation was provided, how individuals were referred, and whether services were being evaluated. Responses were summarised using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The authors received usable responses from 83% of CCGs ( = 162), and of these >90% ( = 147) had some form of care navigation running in their area. A total of 75 different titles were used to describe the role. Most services were open to all adult patients, though particular groups may have been targeted; for example, people who are older and those with long-term conditions. Referrals tended to be made by a professional, or people were identified by a receptionist when they presented to a surgery. Evaluation of care navigation services was limited.

CONCLUSION

There is a policy steer to engaging patients in social prescribing, using some form of care navigator to help with this. Results from this study highlight that, although this type of role is being provided, its implementation is heterogeneous. This could make comparison and the pooling of data on care navigation difficult. It may also leave patients unsure about what care navigation is about and how it could help them.

摘要

背景

护理导航是将患者与能够帮助解决影响健康和福祉的非医疗需求的活动或组织联系起来的一种途径。目前,人们对护理导航在基层医疗中的实施方式缺乏了解。

目的

确定临床委托组(CCG)如何解释和当前实施“护理导航”。

设计和设置

一项涉及英格兰 CCG 的横断面研究。

方法

向所有 CCG 发送了一份问卷,邀请他们就谁提供护理导航、为谁提供护理导航、如何进行人员转介以及是否对服务进行评估发表意见。使用描述性统计对回复进行了总结。

结果

作者收到了 83%(=162)的 CCG 的有效回复,其中>90%(=147)的 CCG 在其所在地区开展了某种形式的护理导航。共有 75 种不同的标题被用来描述这个角色。大多数服务对所有成年患者开放,但也可能针对特定群体,例如老年人和患有长期疾病的人。转诊通常由专业人员进行,或者当人们到诊所就诊时,由接待员确定。对护理导航服务的评估有限。

结论

有政策指导要求让患者参与社会处方,使用某种形式的护理导航员来帮助他们。这项研究的结果表明,尽管正在提供这种类型的角色,但它的实施是多种多样的。这可能使得护理导航的比较和数据汇总变得困难。这也可能使患者不确定护理导航是什么以及它如何帮助他们。