• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大西洋鸿沟:美国、英国和爱尔兰对比鲜明的外科机器人培训。

The Atlantic divide: contrasting surgical robotics training in the USA, UK and Ireland.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, Du Cane Road, London, UK.

Department of Surgery, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5
PMID:35366194
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9939491/
Abstract

The uptake of robotic surgery is rapidly increasing worldwide across surgical specialties. However, there is currently a much higher use of robotic surgery in the United States of America (USA) compared to the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland. Reduced exposure to robotic surgery in training may lead to longer learning curves and worse patient outcomes. We aimed to identify whether any difference exists in exposure to robotic surgery during general surgical training between trainees in the USA, UK and Ireland. Over a 15-week period from September 2021, a survey was distributed through the professional networks of the research team. Participants were USA, UK or Irish trainees who were part of a formal general surgical training curriculum. 116 survey responses were received. US trainees (n = 34) had all had robotic simulator experience, compared to only 37.93% of UK (n = 58) and 75.00% of Irish (n = 24) trainees (p <  0.00001). 91.18% of US trainees had performed 15 or more cases as the console surgeon, compared to only 3.44% of UK and 16.67% of Irish trainees (p <  0.00001). Fifty UK trainees (86.21%) and 22 Irish trainees (91.67%) compared to 12 US trainees (35.29%) do not think they have had adequate robotics training (p <  0.00001). Surgical trainees in the USA have had significantly more exposure to training in robotic surgery than their UK and Irish counterparts.

摘要

机器人手术在全球范围内的外科专业领域迅速普及。然而,与英国和爱尔兰相比,美国目前使用机器人手术的比例要高得多。在培训中接触机器人手术的机会减少可能导致学习曲线更长,患者预后更差。我们旨在确定美国、英国和爱尔兰的外科培训生在普通外科培训中接触机器人手术的情况是否存在差异。在 2021 年 9 月的 15 周内,通过研究团队的专业网络分发了一份调查。参与者是来自美国、英国或爱尔兰的培训生,他们都参加了正式的普通外科培训课程。共收到 116 份调查回复。美国的培训生(n=34)都有机器人模拟器的经验,而英国(n=58)和爱尔兰(n=24)的培训生只有 37.93%和 75.00%有过这种经历(p<0.00001)。91.18%的美国培训生作为控制台外科医生完成了 15 例或更多的手术,而英国和爱尔兰的培训生只有 3.44%和 16.67%(p<0.00001)。与 12 名美国培训生(35.29%)相比,50 名英国培训生(86.21%)和 22 名爱尔兰培训生(91.67%)认为他们没有接受过足够的机器人手术培训(p<0.00001)。与英国和爱尔兰的同行相比,美国的外科培训生在机器人手术培训方面的接触机会明显更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af3/9939491/7f3c959cdd42/11701_2022_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af3/9939491/7f3c959cdd42/11701_2022_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1af3/9939491/7f3c959cdd42/11701_2022_1399_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Atlantic divide: contrasting surgical robotics training in the USA, UK and Ireland.大西洋鸿沟:美国、英国和爱尔兰对比鲜明的外科机器人培训。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):117-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01399-5. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
2
Attitudes and access of Irish general surgery trainees to robotic surgical training.爱尔兰普通外科住院医师对机器人手术培训的态度与参与情况
Surg Open Sci. 2022 Mar 30;9:24-27. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.03.010. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study.机器人妇科手术培训课程的开发和德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Mar 4;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y.
4
Surgical trainee experience and opinion of robotic surgery in surgical training and vision for the future: a snapshot study of pan-specialty surgical trainees.外科住院医师在外科培训中对机器人手术的体验、看法及未来展望:一项针对多专科外科住院医师的简要研究
J Robot Surg. 2022 Oct;16(5):1073-1082. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01344-y. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
A review of minimal access surgery provision and training within the United Kingdom.英国微创外科服务提供和培训情况综述。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 31;18(1):234. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01973-z.
6
Expectations versus reality: trainee participation on the robotic console in academic surgery.期望与现实:学术外科手术中实习生在机器人操作台上的参与情况
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4805-4810. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07874-0. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
7
Objective assessment in residency-based training for transoral robotic surgery.住院医师规范化培训中的经口机器人手术客观评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 Oct;122(10):2184-92. doi: 10.1002/lary.23369. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
8
Robotic surgery education in Australia and New Zealand: primetime for a curriculum.澳大利亚和新西兰的机器人手术教育:课程的黄金时期。
ANZ J Surg. 2024 Feb;94(1-2):30-36. doi: 10.1111/ans.18843. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
9
Assessment of robotic simulation by trainees in residency programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association.美国泌尿外科学会东南分部住院医师项目中受训者对机器人模拟的评估。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Sep-Oct;70(5):571-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.04.014. Epub 2013 May 24.
10
Developing basic robotic skills using virtual reality simulation and automated assessment tools: a multidisciplinary robotic virtual reality-based curriculum using the Da Vinci Skills Simulator and tracking progress with the Intuitive Learning platform.利用虚拟现实模拟和自动化评估工具开发基本机器人技能:使用达芬奇技能模拟器和直观学习平台进行多学科机器人虚拟现实课程,并跟踪进度。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Dec;16(6):1313-1319. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01363-9. Epub 2022 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Procedural robotic surgery training: a UK pan-specialty trainee Delphi consensus study.程序性机器人手术培训:一项英国多专业受训人员德尔菲共识研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 21;19(1):501. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02582-0.
2
A pan-European survey of robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery: European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) initiative.一项针对胃肠外科机器人培训的泛欧调查:欧洲机器人手术共识(ERSC)倡议。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):907-921. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11373-x. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
3
Assessing the feasibility and acceptability of a hands-on surgical robotics workshop for medical students and early-career doctors.

本文引用的文献

1
A standardized approach for the thoracic dissection in robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中胸部分离的标准化方法。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Nov 26;33(Supplement_2). doi: 10.1093/dote/doaa066.
2
Uptake and accessibility of surgical robotics in England.英国手术机器人的应用与可及性
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1-7. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2174. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术:最大荟萃分析。
评估面向医学生和初级医生的手术机器人实践工作坊的可行性和可接受性。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Nov 1;18(1):390. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02134-y.
4
Pioneering the future of robotic liver surgery.开创机器人肝脏手术的未来。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Aug 1;13(4):721-723. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-312. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access.推进微创肝胆胰手术:采用障碍和公平获取。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5643-5650. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11078-1. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
6
The development of tissue handling skills is sufficient and comparable after training in virtual reality or on a surgical robotic system: a prospective randomized trial.虚拟现实或手术机器人系统训练后,组织处理技能的发展是充足且相当的:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2900-2910. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10842-7. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
7
Utilising an accelerated Delphi process to develop consensus on the requirement and components of a pre-procedural core robotic surgery curriculum.利用加速德尔菲法制定术前核心机器人手术课程的需求和组成部分的共识。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Aug;17(4):1443-1455. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01518-2. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:210-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
Applying the Delphi process for development of a hepatopancreaticobiliary robotic surgery training curriculum.运用德尔菲法开发肝胆胰机器人手术培训课程。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4233-4244. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07836-6. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
5
Association of Mentorship and a Formal Robotic Proficiency Skills Curriculum With Subsequent Generations' Learning Curve and Safety for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.师徒制与正式机器人熟练技能课程对后续几代人学习曲线和机器人胰十二指肠切除术安全性的影响。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):607-615. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1040.
6
Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.英国一家三级转诊肝胆胰中心行机器人胰十二指肠切除术:从开放和腹腔镜到机器人手术的过渡——机器人胰十二指肠切除术的早期经验。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 Nov;22(11):1637-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
7
The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.机器人辅助腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术外科医生的学习曲线:在高容量胰腺中心的回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2927-2933. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
8
Estimation of the Acquisition and Operating Costs for Robotic Surgery.机器人手术的购置和运营成本估算。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 28;320(8):835-836. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9219.
9
Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner?经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的比较:谁是赢家?
World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
10
Developing a robotic pancreas program: the Dutch experience.开发机器人胰腺项目:荷兰的经验。
J Vis Surg. 2017 Aug 21;3:106. doi: 10.21037/jovs.2017.07.02. eCollection 2017.