• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于指南的风险分层与经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科瓣膜置换术患者选择的一致性。

Concordance of Guideline-Based Risk Stratification and Selection of Patients for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation or Surgical Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont.

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jun 15;173:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.02.042
PMID:35367045
Abstract

The 2020 American Health Association/American College of Cardiology valve guidelines recommend surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis (AS) age <65 years and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for patients with AS age >80 years. We analyzed TAVI versus SAVR practice patterns using age-based recommendations. We compared 2016-to-2019 TAVI and isolated SAVR in northern New England at 5 centers according to guideline-recommended age groups. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of TAVI for the intermediate age group. The study was approved by each site's institutional review board in accordance with ongoing participation and quality improvement efforts in the Northern New England Cardiovascular Study Group. Among 4,161 patients with isolated severe AS, TAVI increased from 2016 to 2019: 55.8% versus 76.1%, p <0.01 for trend. SAVR for patients with AS age >80 years was uncommon and decreased over time: 13.1% versus 1.6%, p <0.01. TAVI utilization nearly doubled over time in young patients with AS age <65 years (14.3% vs 26.2%, p <0.01). Preference for SAVR decreased by 50% over time (p <0.01) in the intermediate age group (65 to 80 years). Independent predictors of TAVI among patients aged 65 to 80 years included older age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous stroke, and coronary artery bypass grafting, whereas vascular disease and clinical urgency favored SAVR. In conclusion, consistent with current American Health Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, TAVI was the treatment of choice in >97% of severe patients with AS age >80 years by 2019. TAVI utilization in patients <65 years has doubled over time and thus may not reflect current guideline recommendations. TAVI is the preferred choice in those aged 65 to 80 years, especially among patients with previous stroke or coronary artery bypass grafting.

摘要

2020 年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会瓣膜指南建议,对于年龄<65 岁有症状的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,推荐进行外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR);对于年龄>80 岁的 AS 患者,推荐行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)。我们根据年龄建议,分析了 TAVI 与 SAVR 的实践模式。我们根据指南推荐的年龄组,比较了 2016 年至 2019 年在新英格兰北部 5 个中心的 TAVI 和孤立性 SAVR。采用多变量逻辑回归分析了中间年龄组 TAVI 的独立预测因素。该研究得到了每个中心机构审查委员会的批准,符合新英格兰北部心血管研究组正在进行的参与和质量改进工作。在 4161 例孤立性严重 AS 患者中,TAVI 的比例从 2016 年到 2019 年增加:55.8%比 76.1%,趋势有统计学意义(p<0.01)。对于年龄>80 岁的 AS 患者,SAVR 少见且随时间减少:13.1%比 1.6%,趋势有统计学意义(p<0.01)。年龄<65 岁的年轻 AS 患者 TAVI 的使用率随时间几乎翻了一番(14.3%比 26.2%,p<0.01)。中间年龄组(65 至 80 岁)SAVR 的偏好程度随时间降低了 50%(p<0.01)。65 至 80 岁患者 TAVI 的独立预测因素包括年龄较大、慢性阻塞性肺疾病、既往卒中史和冠状动脉旁路移植术,而血管疾病和临床紧急情况则有利于 SAVR。总之,与当前的美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会指南一致,到 2019 年,超过 97%的年龄>80 岁严重 AS 患者选择 TAVI 作为治疗方法。年龄<65 岁的患者 TAVI 的使用率随时间翻了一番,因此可能无法反映当前的指南建议。TAVI 是 65 至 80 岁患者的首选治疗方法,尤其是在有既往卒中或冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中。

相似文献

1
Concordance of Guideline-Based Risk Stratification and Selection of Patients for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation or Surgical Replacement.基于指南的风险分层与经导管主动脉瓣植入术或外科瓣膜置换术患者选择的一致性。
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Jun 15;173:94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.02.042. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis at Low Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗低手术风险的重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Nov 2;20(14):1-148. eCollection 2020.
3
Factors influencing the choice between transcatheter and surgical treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patients younger than 80 years: Results from the OBSERVANT study.影响 80 岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管与手术治疗选择的因素:来自 OBSERVANT 研究的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):E186-E195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28447. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
4
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe, Symptomatic Aortic Valve Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: A Health Technology Assessment.中度手术风险的重度症状性主动脉瓣狭窄患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(2):1-121. eCollection 2020.
5
Trends and outcomes of combined percutaneous (TAVI+PCI) and surgical approach (SAVR+CABG) for patients with aortic valve and coronary artery disease: A National Readmission Database (NRD) analysis.主动脉瓣和冠状动脉疾病患者行经皮(TAVI+PCI)和外科联合治疗(SAVR+CABG)的趋势和结果:国家再入院数据库(NRD)分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Nov;102(5):946-957. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30832. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Updated clinical indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis: expert opinion of the Italian Society of Cardiology and GISE.经导管主动脉瓣植入术治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的更新临床适应证:意大利心脏病学会和 GISE 的专家意见。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 May;19(5):197-210. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000636.
7
Neurological damage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical aortic valve replacement in intermediate risk patients.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在中危患者中的神经损伤比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2016 Jun;105(6):508-17. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0946-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
8
The Outcomes of Pulmonary Hypertension Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Who Underwent Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement or Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.肺动脉高压合并重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术或经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 15;124(4):586-593. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 25.
9
[Outcome comparison of different therapy procedures in surgical high-risk elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis].[外科高危老年重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者不同治疗方法的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):13-18. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.004.
10
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low and intermediate risk: A risk specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经导管主动脉瓣植入术与低、中度风险患者外科主动脉瓣置换术的比较:随机对照试验的风险特异性荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 24;14(9):e0221922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221922. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in Isolated and Combined Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis in Patients Younger Than 65 Years.65岁以下严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者单纯及联合主动脉瓣置换的趋势
Struct Heart. 2025 Jun 24;9(8):100684. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2025.100684. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Impact of cerebral protection on observed versus predicted in-hospital stroke in a high stroke risk TAVR cohort.高卒中风险 TAVR 队列中脑保护对观察到的与预测到的住院卒中的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04097-2.
3
Temporal Trends in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Isolated Severe Aortic Stenosis.
单纯严重主动脉瓣狭窄经导管主动脉瓣置换术的时间趋势
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Apr 5;3(7):101861. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101861. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (from inception to standard treatment): a single-center observational study.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(从起始到标准治疗):一项单中心观察性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jan 15;11:1298346. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1298346. eCollection 2024.