Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023 May;27(2):252-261. doi: 10.1111/eje.12798. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
INTRODUCTION: This scoping review aimed to determine the frequency of different teaching methodologies, tools and platforms applied in dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy was performed in six databases and grey literature. A total of 28 questionnaire-based studies were included, without language or time restriction, from 20 different countries. RESULTS: Six thousand five hundred sixty-five participants were assessed: 84% undergraduates, 9% of faculty members, 5% of postgraduate students/residents/trainees and 2% of dental schools/residency programs. The pooled eligible data for teaching methodologies were 62% of a combination of different methods (95% CI, 35.5% to 82.3%), 23% a combination of synchronous and asynchronous formats (95% CI, 8.2% to 50.2%) and 15% for only synchronous lectures (95% CI, 4.3% to 42.2%). The reported tools were laptops (40%), smartphones (40%), tablets (40%), desktops (20%), Blackboard (20%), Respondus Lockdown Browser (20%), eProctor (20%) and PowerPoint (20%). The most used platforms were Zoom (70.6%), Microsoft Teams (23.5%) and Cisco Webex (23.5%). A better time management (17.9%; 95% CI, 7.9% to 35.6%) and the possibility of revision with additional notes (14.3%; 95% CI, 5.7% to 31.5%) was the greatest advantages related to dental e-learning, while the increased levels of anxiety/stress/burnout/exhaustion (35.7%; 95% CI, 21% to 54.2%) and internet connection problems (35.7%; 95% CI, 21% to 54.2%) was the most cited disadvantages. CONCLUSION: This scoping review showed promising blended teaching methodologies, tools and platforms in the dental education profile. The evidence suggests that e-learning technologies can widely contribute to dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, this study makes a major contribution to research by assessing the impact of COVID restrictions on dental education and further studies are needed to identify how restrictions in dental practice will affect future professionals.
简介:本范围界定综述旨在确定在 COVID-19 大流行期间牙科教育中应用的不同教学方法、工具和平台的频率。
材料和方法:在六个数据库和灰色文献中进行了搜索策略。共纳入了 28 项基于问卷调查的研究,无语言和时间限制,来自 20 个不同的国家。
结果:评估了 6565 名参与者:84%为本科生,9%为教师,5%为研究生/住院医师/学员,2%为牙科学院/住院医师培训计划。教学方法的综合合格数据为 62%为不同方法的组合(95%CI,35.5%至 82.3%),23%为同步和异步格式的组合(95%CI,8.2%至 50.2%),15%仅为同步讲座(95%CI,4.3%至 42.2%)。报告的工具包括笔记本电脑(40%)、智能手机(40%)、平板电脑(40%)、台式机(20%)、Blackboard(20%)、Respondus Lockdown Browser(20%)、eProctor(20%)和 PowerPoint(20%)。使用最多的平台是 Zoom(70.6%)、Microsoft Teams(23.5%)和 Cisco Webex(23.5%)。更好的时间管理(17.9%;95%CI,7.9%至 35.6%)和添加额外笔记进行复习的可能性(14.3%;95%CI,5.7%至 31.5%)是与牙科电子学习相关的最大优势,而焦虑/压力/倦怠/疲惫增加(35.7%;95%CI,21%至 54.2%)和互联网连接问题(35.7%;95%CI,21%至 54.2%)是被引用最多的缺点。
结论:本范围界定综述显示了牙科教育领域有前景的混合教学方法、工具和平台。证据表明,电子学习技术可以广泛促进 COVID-19 大流行期间的牙科教育。因此,这项研究通过评估 COVID 限制对牙科教育的影响做出了重大贡献,进一步的研究需要确定牙科实践中的限制将如何影响未来的专业人员。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2023-5
J Dent Educ. 2006-5
J Clin Periodontol. 2024-11
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1
J Dent Educ. 2021-7
Dent J (Basel). 2025-8-11
Front Public Health. 2022