• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养有限人群对新的“选择退出”器官捐赠系统的信息需求:荷兰的一项定性研究。

Information Needs of People With Limited Health Literacy Regarding a New "Opt-Out" Organ Donation System: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI (Care and Public Health Research Institute), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2022 Mar 17;35:10295. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10295. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/ti.2022.10295
PMID:35368644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8967934/
Abstract

In the Netherlands, new legislation on organ donation was implemented, based on a "opt-out" consent system, which means that all adults are presumed to consent for organ donation, unless they actively register their decision not to donate. A public information campaign preceded the law change. In the Netherlands, 29% of the population has limited health literacy (LHL). The aim of the study was to gain insight in the information needs of Dutch citizens with LHL regarding organ donation and the new legislation, as well as in their preferred information channels. A qualitative study was performed; 30 people participated in four focus groups and six individual interviews. Transcripts were coded, interviews were thematically analysed. People with LHL need specific information to make an informed decision on organ donation. Relevant topics: 1) choice options, 2) eligibility, 3) role of partner and/or family, 4) impact on quality of care, and 5) process of organ donation. Information should be easy to understand. Current standard materials are too difficult and abstract. People with LHL require personal support to tailor general information to their personal situation, and practical help to actually register their choice. Suggestions on how to improve information is provided.

摘要

在荷兰,新的器官捐赠立法基于“默认同意”制度,这意味着所有成年人都被推定同意器官捐赠,除非他们主动登记表示不同意捐赠。法律修改前进行了一项公共信息宣传活动。荷兰有 29%的人口健康素养有限(LHL)。本研究的目的是了解荷兰具有 LHL 的公民对器官捐赠和新立法的信息需求,以及他们对信息渠道的偏好。进行了一项定性研究;有 30 人参加了四个焦点小组和六次个人访谈。对记录进行了编码,对访谈进行了主题分析。健康素养有限的人需要特定的信息才能就器官捐赠做出明智的决定。相关主题:1)选择选项,2)资格,3)伴侣和/或家人的角色,4)对护理质量的影响,以及 5)器官捐赠过程。信息应该易于理解。当前的标准材料太难且过于抽象。健康素养有限的人需要个人支持,以便将一般信息定制到个人情况中,并在实际注册选择时提供实际帮助。提供了有关如何改进信息的建议。

相似文献

1
Information Needs of People With Limited Health Literacy Regarding a New "Opt-Out" Organ Donation System: A Qualitative Study in the Netherlands.健康素养有限人群对新的“选择退出”器官捐赠系统的信息需求:荷兰的一项定性研究。
Transpl Int. 2022 Mar 17;35:10295. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10295. eCollection 2022.
2
'It's like being conscripted, one volunteer is better than 10 pressed men': A qualitative study into the views of people who plan to opt-out of organ donation.“这就像被征召入伍一样,一个自愿者比 10 个被迫入伍的人要好”:对计划选择退出器官捐献的人的观点的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):257-274. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12406. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
3
Process evaluation of specialist nurse implementation of a soft opt-out organ donation system in Wales.威尔士专科护士实施软性默认器官捐献系统的过程评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):414. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4266-z.
4
General public's view on opt-in, opt-out, and mandated choice organ donation policies: a qualitative study involving Swiss French-speaking citizens favourably disposed towards organ donation.公众对选择加入、选择退出和强制选择器官捐赠政策的看法:一项涉及对器官捐赠持积极态度的瑞士法语区公民的定性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2021 Nov 6;151:w30037. doi: 10.4414/smw.2021.w30037. eCollection 2021 Nov 8.
5
'If I donate my organs it's a gift, if you take them it's theft': a qualitative study of planned donor decisions under opt-out legislation.“如果我捐献器官,那是一份礼物;如果你们拿走,那就是盗窃”:一项关于默认捐献立法下计划捐献者决策的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;19(1):1463. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7774-1.
6
Changing to an Opt Out System for Organ Donation-Reflections From England and Netherlands.从英国和荷兰的经验看选择退出式器官捐献系统的转变。
Transpl Int. 2022 Jul 4;35:10466. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10466. eCollection 2022.
7
"I am in favour of organ donation, but I feel you should opt-in"-qualitative analysis of the #options 2020 survey free-text responses from NHS staff toward opt-out organ donation legislation in England.我支持器官捐赠,但我觉得你应该选择加入”——对英格兰国民保健制度工作人员在#选项 2020 调查中对选择退出器官捐赠立法的免费文本回复的定性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Apr 20;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01048-6.
8
How clinicians discuss patients' donor registrations of consent and presumed consent in donor conversations in an opt-out system: a qualitative embedded multiple-case study.如何在默认同意的捐赠者对话中讨论临床医生如何讨论患者的捐赠者同意登记和假定同意:一项定性嵌入式多案例研究。
Crit Care. 2023 Jul 28;27(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04581-9.
9
'What if I'm not dead?' - Myth-busting and organ donation.“如果我没有死呢?”——破除关于器官捐赠的谣言。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Feb;24(1):141-158. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12344. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
10
Expectations of a new opt-out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study.期待英国新的默认同意器官捐献系统:定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):607-616. doi: 10.1111/hex.13394. Epub 2021 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
From health literacy to organ donation and transplantation awareness: The path through self-control.从健康素养到器官捐赠与移植意识:通过自我控制的途径。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 19;15(4):104859. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i4.104859.

本文引用的文献

1
How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.叙事如何影响结直肠癌筛查决策和参与:一个现实主义综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):327-337. doi: 10.1111/hex.12892. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
The impact of health literacy on shared decision making before elective surgery: a propensity matched case control analysis.健康素养对择期手术前共同决策的影响:一项倾向匹配病例对照分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 12;18(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3755-9.
3
Beyond Reading and Understanding: Health Literacy as the Capacity to Act.超越阅读和理解:作为行动能力的健康素养。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 7;15(8):1676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081676.
4
Health literacy in childhood and youth: a systematic review of definitions and models.儿童和青少年的健康素养:定义与模型的系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4267-y.
5
Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.针对健康素养较低的结直肠癌筛查受邀者的国家结直肠癌筛查计划标准化信息的可及性:一项混合方法研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
6
Socioeconomic Differences in Informed Decisions About Down Syndrome Screening: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda.关于唐氏综合征筛查知情决策中的社会经济差异:系统评价与研究议程
J Health Commun. 2016 Aug;21(8):868-907. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1177145. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
7
Evaluation of printed health education materials for use by low-education families.评估供低教育水平家庭使用的印刷健康教育材料。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2014 Jul;46(4):218-28. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12076. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
8
Factors Associated with Informed Decisions and Participation in Bowel Cancer Screening among Adults with Lower Education and Literacy.低教育水平和识字能力的成年人中与知情决策及参与肠癌筛查相关的因素
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):756-72. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13518976. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.健康素养与公共卫生:系统综述及定义与模式的整合
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-80.
10
Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing.健康素养和参与结直肠癌筛查的自我效能:信息处理的作用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Jun;75(3):352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Apr 21.