• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支传导阻滞且左心室射血分数>35%与≤35%的患者行永久性左束支区域起搏的临床结局

Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35 vs. ≤35.

作者信息

Jiang Zhixin, Wu Tian, Wu Yixian, Chen Zenghong, Yang Wen, Chen Chongchong, Zhou Xiujuan, Shan Qijun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 17;9:838708. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.838708. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.838708
PMID:35369330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8968131/
Abstract

AIMS

The present study aimed to compare the effects of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) on cardiac function and clinical outcomes in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >35 vs. ≤35%.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-six consecutive patients with LBBB and LVEF <50% were enrolled. All patients were followed up for a mean of 6 months. The successful LBBAP was defined as a paced QRS complex presented as right bundle branch block (RBBB) morphology and QRSd < 130 ms. Echocardiography parameters, pacing parameters and clinical outcomes were collected. The successful LBBAP was achieved in 77.8% of all cases (28/36). In LVEF > 35% group (70 ± 8 years, 9 male), the success rate was 81.0% (17/21). QRSd significantly decreased from 174 ± 23 ms to 108 ± 13 ms ( < 0.001). The pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude were 0.6 ± 0.2 V @ 0.5 ms and 12 ± 7 mV, respectively. In LVEF ≤ 35% group (69 ± 5 years, 9 male), the success rate was 73.3% (11/15) with QRSd decreasing from 188 ± 25 ms to 107 ± 11 ms ( < 0.001). The hyperresponders to LBBAP (functional recovery and LVEF ≥ 50%) in LVEF > 35% group was 52.9%, which were almost twice of that in LVEF ≤ 35% group (33.3%). Whether patients had LBBAP or left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP), patients in the LVEF > 35% group showed significantly lower incidence of heart failure hospitalizations or death from any cause (hazard ratio in LVEF > 35% group, 0.22; 95%CI, 0.06 to 0.75, = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP can significantly shorten the QRSd and improve cardiac function in LBBB patients with either LVEF > 35 or ≤ 35%. LBBAP should be considered as an effective therapy for preventing the deterioration of cardiac function in early-stage heart failure patients with LBBB and LVEF > 35%.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)对左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)且左心室射血分数(LVEF)>35%与≤35%患者的心功能及临床结局的影响。

方法与结果

连续纳入36例LBBB且LVEF<50%的患者。所有患者平均随访6个月。成功的LBBAP定义为起搏QRS波群呈右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)形态且QRS时限(QRSd)<130 ms。收集超声心动图参数、起搏参数及临床结局。所有病例中77.8%(28/36)成功完成LBBAP。在LVEF>35%组(70±8岁,9例男性),成功率为81.0%(17/21)。QRSd从174±23 ms显著降至108±13 ms(<0.001)。起搏阈值和R波振幅分别为0.6±0.2 V @ 0.5 ms和12±7 mV。在LVEF≤35%组(69±5岁,9例男性),成功率为73.3%(11/15),QRSd从188±25 ms降至107±11 ms(<0.001)。LVEF>35%组中对LBBAP超反应者(功能恢复且LVEF≥50%)为52.9%,几乎是LVEF≤35%组(33.3%)的两倍。无论患者接受LBBAP还是左心室间隔起搏(LVSP),LVEF>35%组患者因任何原因导致的心力衰竭住院或死亡发生率均显著较低(LVEF>35%组的风险比为0.22;95%置信区间,从0.06至0.75,P=0.011)。

结论

LBBAP可显著缩短LBBB患者(无论LVEF>35%还是≤35%)的QRSd并改善心功能。LBBAP应被视为预防LBBB且LVEF>35%的早期心力衰竭患者心功能恶化的有效治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d67/8968131/7efcfc7f14d2/fcvm-09-838708-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d67/8968131/f24c39289343/fcvm-09-838708-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d67/8968131/7efcfc7f14d2/fcvm-09-838708-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d67/8968131/f24c39289343/fcvm-09-838708-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d67/8968131/7efcfc7f14d2/fcvm-09-838708-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35 vs. ≤35.左束支传导阻滞且左心室射血分数>35%与≤35%的患者行永久性左束支区域起搏的临床结局
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 17;9:838708. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.838708. eCollection 2022.
2
ECG patterns of successful permanent left bundle branch area pacing in bradycardia patients with typical bundle branch block.心动过缓伴典型束支阻滞患者中成功的永久性左束支区域起搏的心电图模式。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):781-790. doi: 10.1111/pace.13982. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
Feasibility and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing in patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy.左束支区域起搏用于心脏再同步治疗适应证患者的可行性和疗效。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii54-ii60. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa271.
4
Left bundle branch area pacing delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy and comparison with biventricular pacing.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏输送及与双心室起搏的比较。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1711-1722. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12731. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing improves mitral regurgitation and cardiac function in patients with right bundle branch block.永久性左束支区域起搏改善右束支传导阻滞患者的二尖瓣反流和心功能。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 19;24(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04175-5.
6
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
7
Cardiac resynchronization performed by LBBaP-CRT in patients with cardiac insufficiency and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭合并左束支传导阻滞患者。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021 Nov;26(6):e12898. doi: 10.1111/anec.12898. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
8
Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and right bundle branch block: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative-Study Group.心力衰竭合并右束支传导阻滞患者的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 May 14;3(4):358-367. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.05.004. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Left bundle branch area pacing results in more physiological ventricular activation than biventricular pacing in patients with left bundle branch block heart failure.在左束支传导阻滞心力衰竭患者中,左束支区域起搏比双心室起搏能产生更生理性的心室激活。
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 May 24;25(Suppl E):E17-E24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad109. eCollection 2023 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
The Clinical and Angiographic Profile and Outcomes of Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB): An Observational Study From a Tertiary Care Center in North India.左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)患者的临床、血管造影特征及预后:来自印度北部一家三级医疗中心的观察性研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87953. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87953. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The Emerging Role of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy.左束支区域起搏在心脏再同步治疗中的新兴作用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Dec 1;12:e29. doi: 10.15420/aer.2023.15. eCollection 2023.
3
Left bundle branch area pacing in mildly reduced heart failure: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT): Results from an international LBBAP collaborative study group.左束支优化心脏再同步治疗(LOT-CRT):来自国际 LBBAP 合作研究小组的结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.057. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
2
Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Results From the International LBBAP Collaborative Study Group.心脏再同步治疗的左束支区域起搏:国际左束支区域起搏协作研究组的结果
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):135-147. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.
左束支区域起搏治疗轻度心力衰竭:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):713-720. doi: 10.1002/clc.24028. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Recruitment of the cardiac conduction system for optimal resynchronization therapy in failing heart.在心力衰竭中招募心脏传导系统以实现最佳再同步治疗。
Front Physiol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1045740. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.1045740. eCollection 2022.
大型单中心研究中的左束支起搏的长期安全性和可行性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
Remarkable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy via left bundle branch pacing in patients with true left bundle branch block.真性左束支传导阻滞患者经左束支区域起搏实现心脏再同步治疗的显著疗效。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Dec;43(12):1460-1468. doi: 10.1002/clc.23462. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
5
Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.左束支区域起搏治疗心力衰竭伴左束支传导阻滞患者的心脏再同步治疗。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1783-1790. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
6
A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing.永久性左束支起搏初学者指南。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1791-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.06.016. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
7
Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing.前瞻性评估左束支区域起搏的可行性及电生理和超声心动图特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1774-1782. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 25.
8
Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics.左束支起搏治疗症状性心动过缓:植入成功率、安全性和起搏特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1758-1765. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
The characteristics of the electrocardiogram and the intracardiac electrogram in left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏时心电图和心内心电图的特征
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1096-1101. doi: 10.1111/jce.13956. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Permanent left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block: Feasibility, safety, and acute effect.永久性左束支区域起搏治疗房室传导阻滞:可行性、安全性和急性效应。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1766-1773. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 Apr 29.