• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚洲人群中不同血红蛋白水平的患者接受半紧急和择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床特征及长期预后

Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Differing Haemoglobin Levels Undergoing Semi-Urgent and Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Asian Population.

作者信息

Soh Rodney Yu-Hang, Sia Ching-Hui, Djohan Andie Hartanto, Lau Rui-Huai, Ho Pei-Ying, Neo Jonathan Wen-Hui, Ho Jamie Sin-Ying, Sim Hui-Wen, Yeo Tiong-Cheng, Tan Huay-Cheem, Chan Mark Yan-Yee, Loh Joshua Ping-Yun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 18;9:687555. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.687555. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.687555
PMID:35369342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8971291/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the impact of anaemia on long-term clinical outcomes in patients who underwent semi-urgent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in an Asian population. Although the effects of anaemia on outcomes in Asian patients are well studied for acute coronary syndrome, its impact on Asian patients undergoing semi-urgent and elective PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent semi-urgent and elective PCI from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015, at a tertiary academic centre. A total of 1,685 patients were included. They were stratified into three groups: normal (≥12 g/dL), intermediate (10-11.9 g/dL), and low (<10 g/dL) haemoglobin levels. Demographics, risk factors, and end-points including the 5-point major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (all-cause death, subsequent stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, and target lesion revascularisation), cardiovascular death, and bleeding events were analysed.

RESULTS

Patients in intermediate and low haemoglobin level groups were older with more comorbidities. Compared to the normal haemoglobin level group, low haemoglobin level group patients were associated with an increased risk of composite endpoints of all-cause death, subsequent stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive cardiac failure, and target lesion revascularisation [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.22, 2.92; = 0.004]. This was driven by the increased risk of target lesions revascularisation observed in the low haemoglobin level group compared to the normal haemoglobin level group (aHR 17.74, 95% CI: 1.74, 180.80; = 0.015). The patients in the low haemoglobin level group were also associated with a higher risk of bleeding events compared to the normal haemoglobin level group (aHR 7.18, 95% CI: 1.13, 45.40; = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

In our Asian cohort, patients with anaemia undergoing PCI were associated with a higher comorbid burden. Despite adjustments for comorbidities, these patients had higher mortality and worse cardiovascular outcomes following contemporary PCI.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在调查贫血对亚洲人群中接受半紧急和择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者长期临床结局的影响。虽然贫血对亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征患者结局的影响已得到充分研究,但其对接受半紧急和择期PCI的亚洲患者的影响尚不清楚。

方法

这是一项对2014年1月1日至2015年12月31日在一家三级学术中心接受半紧急和择期PCI患者的回顾性队列研究。共纳入1685例患者。他们被分为三组:血红蛋白水平正常(≥12 g/dL)、中等(10 - 11.9 g/dL)和低(<10 g/dL)。分析了人口统计学、危险因素和终点,包括5分主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)(全因死亡、随后的中风、心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和靶病变血运重建)、心血管死亡和出血事件。

结果

血红蛋白水平中等和低的组患者年龄更大,合并症更多。与血红蛋白水平正常组相比,血红蛋白水平低的组患者全因死亡、随后的中风、心肌梗死、充血性心力衰竭和靶病变血运重建的复合终点风险增加[调整后风险比(aHR)1.89,95%置信区间(CI):1.22,2.92;P = 0.004]。这是由血红蛋白水平低的组与血红蛋白水平正常组相比观察到的靶病变血运重建风险增加所驱动的(aHR 17.74,95% CI:1.74,180.80;P = 0.015)。与血红蛋白水平正常组相比,血红蛋白水平低的组患者出血事件风险也更高(aHR 7.18,95% CI:1.13,45.40;P = 0.036)。

结论

在我们的亚洲队列中,接受PCI的贫血患者合并症负担更高。尽管对合并症进行了调整,但这些患者在当代PCI后死亡率更高,心血管结局更差。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6116/8971291/0a7d2e7e5207/fcvm-09-687555-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6116/8971291/f9d4f97652e9/fcvm-09-687555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6116/8971291/0a7d2e7e5207/fcvm-09-687555-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6116/8971291/f9d4f97652e9/fcvm-09-687555-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6116/8971291/0a7d2e7e5207/fcvm-09-687555-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Differing Haemoglobin Levels Undergoing Semi-Urgent and Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Asian Population.亚洲人群中不同血红蛋白水平的患者接受半紧急和择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床特征及长期预后
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 18;9:687555. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.687555. eCollection 2022.
2
The impact of chronic kidney disease on long-term outcomes following semi-urgent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention.慢性肾脏病对半紧急和择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后长期结局的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):517-525. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000980.
3
Impact of anaemia on long-term outcomes in patients treated with first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents; Katowice-Zabrze Registry.贫血对接受第一代和第二代药物洗脱支架治疗患者长期预后的影响;卡托维兹-扎布热注册研究
Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(6):561-9. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0217. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
4
Impact of anaemia on clinical outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the AFCAS registry.贫血对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的心房颤动患者临床结局的影响:来自AFCAS注册研究的见解
BMJ Open. 2014 May 13;4(5):e004700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004700.
5
Clinical Outcomes in Older Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.老年非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的临床转归。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Feb;30(2):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.05.102. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
6
Haemoglobin-related mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中与血红蛋白相关的死亡率。
Eur Heart J. 2003 Dec;24(23):2142-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ehj.2003.09.008.
7
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
8
[Outcome of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction less than 50% undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention].冠状动脉疾病且左心室射血分数低于50%的患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1058-1066. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.010.
9
Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干狭窄:NOBLE 随机非劣效性试验的 5 年更新结果。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):191-199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32972-1. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
Prognostic impact of anaemia on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI.贫血对接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2014 Jan;25(1):52-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000038.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk stratification algorithm for clinical outcomes in anemic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.贫血患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结局风险分层算法。
Ann Med. 2023;55(2):2249200. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2249200.

本文引用的文献

1
A focused review on optimal coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease: Coronary revascularisation in kidney disease.慢性肾脏病患者最佳冠状动脉血运重建的聚焦综述:肾脏病中的冠状动脉血运重建
AsiaIntervention. 2019 Feb;5(1):32-40. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-18-00015. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
2
The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.东亚悖论:心血管疾病患者当前抗栓策略面临挑战的最新立场声明。
Thromb Haemost. 2021 Apr;121(4):422-432. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718729. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
3
Meta-Analysis Comparing P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome.
比较急性冠状动脉综合征中 P2Y 抑制剂的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 15;125(12):1815-1822. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.03.019. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
4
Association between red blood cell distribution width and long-term mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with previous history of cancer.红细胞分布宽度与既往癌症史行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的长期死亡率之间的关系。
Biomarkers. 2020 May;25(3):260-267. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1734860. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
5
Polymer-based or Polymer-free Stents in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者中使用聚合物基或无聚合物支架。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1208-1218. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910021. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
6
Outcomes Among Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, and Ticagrelor in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Who Underwent Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention From the TOTAL Trial.TOTAL 试验中接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的结局。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Oct;35(10):1377-1385. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.04.026. Epub 2019 May 7.
7
Real-world comparison of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.真实世界中经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的比较。
Open Heart. 2019 Jun 29;6(1):e000951. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000951. eCollection 2019.
8
Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor for Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.普拉格雷与替格瑞洛用于行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Oct;19(5):465-476. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00337-5.
9
Impact of anemia on percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients: A large single center data.贫血对中国患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的影响:一项大型单中心数据。
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Dec;31(6):826-833. doi: 10.1111/joic.12570. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
An Update on Radial Artery Access and Best Practices for Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性冠状动脉综合征经桡动脉入路和经桡动脉冠状动脉造影及介入治疗的最新进展:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e000035. doi: 10.1161/HCV.0000000000000035.