Ribeiro Olga Rodrigues, Costa Paula, do Carmo Isabel, Paiva Teresa, Figueira Maria Luísa
Hospital de Egas Moniz, Neuropsychology Unit; Instituto de Saúde Ambiental - Lisboa - Lisboa - Portugal.
IPSS, Associação Living Care - Madeira - Madeira - Portugal.
Sleep Sci. 2022 Apr-Jun;15(Spec 2):339-346. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20210009.
This study aimed to compare the results of a conservative method and the Sleeve Gastrectomy procedure for weight loss on the cognitive-emotional performance of severely obese women assessed for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.
Two samples consisting of females, approved for Sleeve Gastrectomy (n = 21) and Conservative Treatment (n = 21) underwent night polysomnography and completed a battery of neuropsychological and emotional tests before and 6 months after the interventions. We compared intra- and inter-sample results, post interventions result to controls, and treated patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.
Anthropometry, immediate memory, attention, executive functions, and emotional maladjustment improved after the interventions. The conservative method showed better results for inhibitory control, and surgery showed better results for cognitive flexibility, speed of information processing and general cognitive and emotional performance for women with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome. Learning decreased following both interventions. Memory and cognitive flexibility were lower in the comparison group than in control groups.
Treatments impacted different cognitive domains with probable influence on the objectives achieved. Lower middle pressure for behaviour modification may have reduced learning after interventions. The reduction of depression/anxiety in women with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea may result from the improvement of the social effects of both conditions. Although with better results for the surgical method, anthropometric reductions in both methods, positively influenced the cognitive/emotional domains. The maintenance of cognitive weaknesses implies longer and more focused interventions to avoid the regression of results like the worsening of Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.
本研究旨在比较保守方法和袖状胃切除术对重度肥胖女性认知-情绪表现的减肥效果,这些女性因阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征接受评估。
两个样本,分别为经批准接受袖状胃切除术的女性(n = 21)和接受保守治疗的女性(n = 21),她们在干预前和干预后6个月接受了夜间多导睡眠监测,并完成了一系列神经心理学和情绪测试。我们比较了样本内和样本间的结果、干预后结果与对照组的结果,以及患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的治疗患者的结果。
干预后人体测量、即时记忆、注意力、执行功能和情绪失调均有所改善。保守方法在抑制控制方面显示出更好的效果,而手术在认知灵活性、信息处理速度以及阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征女性的总体认知和情绪表现方面显示出更好的效果。两种干预后学习能力均下降。与对照组相比,比较组的记忆和认知灵活性较低。
治疗对不同的认知领域产生影响,可能对实现的目标有影响。行为改变的较低中间压力可能导致干预后学习能力下降。阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停女性抑郁/焦虑的减轻可能源于两种情况的社会影响的改善。虽然手术方法效果更好,但两种方法的人体测量减少均对认知/情绪领域产生了积极影响。认知弱点的持续存在意味着需要更长时间和更有针对性的干预,以避免结果的倒退,如阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的恶化。