Suppr超能文献

拔牙创口与股骨骨折之间骨愈合过程的病理差异

Pathological differences in the bone healing processes between tooth extraction socket and femoral fracture.

作者信息

Ito Shinichirou, Kasahara Norio, Kitamura Kei, Matsunaga Satoru, Mizoguchi Toshihide, Htun Myo Win, Shibata Yasuaki, Abe Shinichi, Takano Masayuki, Yamaguchi Akira

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Histology and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Bone Rep. 2022 Mar 24;16:101522. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2022.101522. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Despite various reports on the bone healing processes of tooth extraction socket and long bone fracture, the differences of pathological changes during these healing processes remain elusive. This study aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind the pathophysiology of bone regeneration between the tooth extraction socket and femoral fractures through a comparative study. Eight-week-old male mice were used in the experiments. The maxillary first molar was extracted, and intramedullary nailing femoral fracture (semistabilized fracture repair) was performed in the femur. Pathological changes in these bone injuries were investigated by micro-CT, histology, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR until day 7 post operation. Pathological changes in drill hole injury created in cortical bone of femur were also examined. Micro-CT analyses revealed increases in mineralized tissues in both the tooth extraction socket and femoral fracture. Histological examinations revealed that tooth socket was repaired by intramembranous ossification, and intramedullary nailing femoral fracture was healed by endochondral ossification. Immunohistochemical investigation revealed that tooth socket healing associated with Sp7-positive cells but not Sox9, aggrecan, and type II collagen, while femoral fracture models exhibited positive signals for all antibodies. RT-PCR analyses revealed the expression of , , and in tooth socket healing, and the expression of , , , , , , and in intramedullary nailing femoral fracture. Drill hole injury was repaired primarily by intramembranous ossification when the periosteum was removed before making the hole. The present study demonstrated that the absence of cartilage appearance during tooth extraction socket healing indicates it as distinctly different pathological features from the healing processes of semistabilized femoral fracture. This study contributes to the understanding of the molecular and cellular characteristics of bone healing among the different sites of bone injury.

摘要

尽管有各种关于拔牙窝和长骨骨折骨愈合过程的报道,但这些愈合过程中病理变化的差异仍不明确。本研究旨在通过比较研究阐明拔牙窝和股骨骨折骨再生病理生理学背后的潜在机制。实验使用8周龄雄性小鼠。拔除上颌第一磨牙,并在股骨中进行髓内钉固定股骨骨折(半稳定骨折修复)。通过显微CT、组织学、免疫组织化学和逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)研究这些骨损伤直至术后第7天的病理变化。还检查了股骨皮质骨钻孔损伤的病理变化。显微CT分析显示拔牙窝和股骨骨折处矿化组织均增加。组织学检查显示牙槽窝通过膜内成骨修复,髓内钉固定股骨骨折通过软骨内成骨愈合。免疫组织化学研究显示牙槽窝愈合与Sp7阳性细胞相关,但与Sox9、聚集蛋白聚糖和II型胶原无关,而股骨骨折模型对所有抗体均呈阳性信号。RT-PCR分析显示拔牙窝愈合中有、和的表达,髓内钉固定股骨骨折中有、、、、、和的表达。在钻孔前去除骨膜时,钻孔损伤主要通过膜内成骨修复。本研究表明,拔牙窝愈合过程中无软骨出现表明其病理特征与半稳定股骨骨折的愈合过程明显不同。本研究有助于理解不同骨损伤部位骨愈合的分子和细胞特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a368/8965168/e76cecf37fed/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验