Deighton Alexander J, Chhatwal Karanjot, Das Debashish
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Imperial College London, London, UK.
Future Healthc J. 2022 Mar;9(1):67-74. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0163.
With aspects of neurosurgery becoming increasingly digitised, there is a need to understand both the prevalence and impact of digital tools on clinical and organisational outcomes. Consequently, we sought to evaluate evidence of the use of digital tools in neurosurgical settings. We systematically searched three public databases for relevant articles: 283 articles were screened using inclusion/exclusion criteria, with 26 selected for further analysis. Many studies reported on the use of simulation, smartphones, telemedicine and robotics in neurosurgical pathways from education through to postoperative care. Though generally beneficial for both patient and organisational outcomes, a number of considerations were highlighted. Many referred to protection of patient data, cost and requirements to ensure socially disadvantaged groups are not further excluded by the move to digital services. Fortunately, with further innovation, many of these limitations look set to dissipate over coming years, paving the way for a more streamlined neurosurgical pathway.
随着神经外科的各个方面越来越数字化,有必要了解数字工具对临床和组织成果的普及率及影响。因此,我们试图评估神经外科环境中使用数字工具的证据。我们系统地在三个公共数据库中搜索相关文章:使用纳入/排除标准筛选了283篇文章,其中26篇被选作进一步分析。许多研究报告了模拟、智能手机、远程医疗和机器人技术在从教育到术后护理的神经外科流程中的应用。虽然总体上对患者和组织成果都有益,但也突出了一些需要考虑的因素。许多涉及患者数据保护、成本以及确保社会弱势群体不会因转向数字服务而被进一步排除的要求。幸运的是,随着进一步创新,这些限制中的许多有望在未来几年消散,为更简化的神经外科流程铺平道路。