Department of Medical Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Applied Statistician, Markham, Ontario, Canada.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022 Jul 11;114(7):924-929. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djac067.
An interim analysis is commonly used in phase III superiority trials to compare treatment arms, with the goal of terminating exposure of patients to ineffective or unsafe drugs or to identify highly effective therapies for earlier public disclosure. Traditionally, interim analyses have been designed to identify early evidence of extremely large benefit of the experimental approach, potentially leading to early dissemination of effective treatments. Increasingly, interim analysis has also involved analysis of futility, which may lead to early termination of a trial that will not yield additional useful information. This presents an important challenge in early stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, where recurrence often occurs late, with a steady annual event rate up to 20 years. Early analysis of events may miss late treatment effects that can be observed only with longer follow-up. We discuss approaches to futility analysis in adjuvant clinical trials in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the role of the Data Safety Monitoring Committee in such analyses, considerations of the potential harms vs benefits of treatment, and the risks of continuing vs early termination of a trial.
中期分析常用于 III 期优效性试验中以比较治疗组,目的是终止对无效或不安全药物的患者暴露,或者识别出高效疗法以尽早公开。传统上,中期分析旨在确定实验方法的极大利益的早期证据,可能导致有效治疗的早期传播。越来越多的中期分析也涉及无效性分析,这可能导致不会产生额外有用信息的试验提前终止。这在激素受体阳性乳腺癌的早期阶段提出了一个重要挑战,因为复发通常很晚发生,在 20 年内每年都有稳定的事件发生率。早期分析事件可能会错过仅通过更长随访才能观察到的晚期治疗效果。我们讨论了在激素受体阳性乳腺癌辅助临床试验中进行无效性分析的方法、数据安全监测委员会在这些分析中的作用、治疗的潜在危害与益处的考虑,以及继续与提前终止试验的风险。