• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在重症 COVID-19 患者中，与常规氧疗相比，高流量氧疗降低了 28 天插管率和临床康复时间。

In severe COVID-19, high-flow vs. conventional oxygen therapy reduced intubation and time to clinical recovery at 28 d.

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA (C.R.C.).

New York Presbyterian Hospital--Weill Cornell, New York City, New York, USA (P.A.S.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):JC38. doi: 10.7326/J22-0011. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

DOI:10.7326/J22-0011
PMID:35377724
Abstract

Ospina-Tascón GA, Calderón-Tapia LE, García AF, et al. JAMA. 2021;326:2161-71. 34874419.

摘要

奥斯皮纳-塔斯孔 GA、卡尔德隆-塔皮亚 LE、加西亚 AF 等人。《美国医学会杂志》。2021；326：2161-71. 34874419.

相似文献

1
In severe COVID-19, high-flow vs. conventional oxygen therapy reduced intubation and time to clinical recovery at 28 d.在重症 COVID-19 患者中，与常规氧疗相比，高流量氧疗降低了 28 天插管率和临床康复时间。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Apr;175(4):JC38. doi: 10.7326/J22-0011. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
2
Effect of High-Flow Oxygen Therapy vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation and Clinical Recovery in Patients With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高流量氧疗与常规氧疗对重症 COVID-19 患者有创机械通气和临床康复的影响：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Dec 7;326(21):2161-2171. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20714.
3
Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The HENIVOT Randomized Clinical Trial.新冠肺炎合并中重度低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者使用头盔无创通气与高流量鼻导管吸氧治疗后脱机时间的影响：HENIVOT 随机临床试验
JAMA. 2021 May 4;325(17):1731-1743. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4682.
4
Effect of Noninvasive Respiratory Strategies on Intubation or Mortality Among Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and COVID-19: The RECOVERY-RS Randomized Clinical Trial.急性低氧性呼吸衰竭和 COVID-19 患者应用无创性呼吸策略对插管或死亡率的影响：RECOVERY-RS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):546-558. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0028.
5
RECOVERY- Respiratory Support: Respiratory Strategies for patients with suspected or proven COVID-19 respiratory failure; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, High-flow Nasal Oxygen, and standard care: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.RECOVERY- 呼吸支持：疑似或确诊 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭患者的呼吸策略；持续气道正压通气、高流量鼻氧和标准治疗：一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04617-3.
6
Non-invasive ventilation versus high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy with apnoeic oxygenation for preoxygenation before intubation of patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: a randomised, multicentre, open-label trial.在急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者插管前预氧合中，无创通气与高流量鼻导管氧疗加呼吸暂停氧合的比较：一项随机、多中心、开放标签试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Apr;7(4):303-312. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30048-7. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
7
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen and Noninvasive Ventilation for COVID-19.高流量鼻氧疗和无创通气用于 COVID-19。
Crit Care Clin. 2022 Jul;38(3):601-621. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
8
In COVID-19 acute hypoxemia, awake prone positioning vs. usual care did not reduce intubation at 30 d.在 COVID-19 急性低氧血症中，清醒俯卧位与常规治疗相比，并未降低 30 天插管率。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Sep;175(9):JC99. doi: 10.7326/J22-0068. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.高流量鼻导管给氧疗法对成人急性低氧血症性呼吸衰竭的影响：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
CMAJ. 2017 Feb 21;189(7):E260-E267. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.160570.
10
Early non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen therapy for preventing endotracheal intubation in hypoxemic blunt chest trauma patients: the OptiTHO randomized trial.早期无创通气和高流量鼻氧疗预防低氧性钝性胸部创伤患者气管插管：OptiTHO 随机试验。
Crit Care. 2023 Apr 26;27(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04429-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of therapeutic effects on type II respiratory failure and impact on blood gas changes: high-flow nasal oxygen therapy vs. non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.II型呼吸衰竭的治疗效果分析及对血气变化的影响：高流量鼻导管给氧疗法与无创正压通气的比较
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Feb 15;16(2):487-495. doi: 10.62347/MUHL4407. eCollection 2024.
2
High-flow nasal oxygen versus conventional oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 respiratory failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.高流量鼻氧疗与常规氧疗和无创通气治疗 COVID-19 呼吸衰竭的比较：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 May;132(5):936-944. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.12.022. Epub 2024 Feb 2.