Analysis of therapeutic effects on type II respiratory failure and impact on blood gas changes: high-flow nasal oxygen therapy vs. non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) vs. non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in type II respiratory failure, and analyze their impact on blood gas parameters.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 110 cases of type II respiratory failure treated from April 2021 to March 2023 categorized patients into control (NIPPV, n=50) and observation (HFNO, n=60) groups. Both groups received comprehensive nursing interventions. Treatment outcomes, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, blood gas parameters, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores were compared before and 48 hours after treatment. Additionally, the complication rates and independent risk factors affecting prognosis were analyzed.

RESULTS

The observation group exhibited superior treatment efficacy compared to the control group (P=0.001). Both groups showed significant improvements in APACHE II scores and respiratory, hemodynamic, and blood gas parameters after treatment (P<0.001), with the observation group experiencing more pronounced improvements (P<0.001). The observation group also had a lower incidence of complications than the control group (P=0.013). Logistic regression identified PaCO and treatment protocol as independent risk factors affecting adverse outcomes (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

HFNO demonstrates superior therapeutic efficacy in type II respiratory failure, significantly improving blood gas parameters with a high level of safety, supporting its clinical applicability.