• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业保险领域的基于价值的支付模式:系统评价。

Value-Based Payment Models In The Commercial Insurance Sector: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Marina A. Milad, Accenture, Chicago, Illinois.

Roslyn C. Murray, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Apr;41(4):540-548. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01020.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01020
PMID:35377757
Abstract

Value-based payment models are a prominent strategy in health reform. Although Medicare payment models have been extensively evaluated, much less is known about value-based payment models in the commercial insurance sector. We performed the first systematic review of the quality, spending, and utilization effects of commercial models, extracting results from fifty-nine studies. Forty-one of these studies evaluated outcomes. More studies had positive results for quality outcomes (81 percent of studies) than for spending (56 percent) and utilization (58 percent). Less rigorous studies were more likely to find positive results. Given the mixed nature of the findings, commercial insurers should identify ways to strengthen value-based payment programs or leverage other strategies to improve health care value.

摘要

基于价值的支付模式是医疗改革的一个突出策略。尽管医疗保险支付模式已经得到了广泛的评估,但商业保险领域基于价值的支付模式的情况却知之甚少。我们对商业模式的质量、支出和利用效果进行了首次系统评价,从 59 项研究中提取了结果。其中 41 项研究评估了结果。在质量结果方面,更多的研究有积极的结果(81%的研究),而在支出(56%)和利用率(58%)方面则较少。更不严格的研究更有可能得出积极的结果。鉴于研究结果的性质复杂,商业保险公司应该找到加强基于价值的支付计划或利用其他策略来提高医疗保健价值的方法。

相似文献

1
Value-Based Payment Models In The Commercial Insurance Sector: A Systematic Review.商业保险领域的基于价值的支付模式:系统评价。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Apr;41(4):540-548. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01020.
2
Physician payment outlook for 2012: déjà vu.2012 年医生薪酬展望:似曾相识。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E27-52.
3
Better Patient Care At High-Quality Hospitals May Save Medicare Money And Bolster Episode-Based Payment Models.在高质量医院提供更好的患者护理可能会节省医疗保险资金,并支持基于诊疗过程的支付模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1681-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0361.
4
The Medicare Access And CHIP Reauthorization Act: Effects On Medicare Payment Policy And Spending.《医疗保险获得和儿童健康保险计划授权法案:对医疗保险支付政策和支出的影响》。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):697-705. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0559.
5
Medicare For All: An Analysis Of Key Policy Issues.全民医保:关键政策问题分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jan;39(1):133-141. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01040.
6
Alternative Payment Models and Associations With Stroke Outcomes, Spending, and Service Utilization: A Systematic Review.替代支付模式与卒中结局、支出和服务利用的关联:系统评价。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):268-278. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.033983. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Spending On Postacute Care After Hospitalization In Commercial Insurance And Medicare Around Age Sixty-Five.六十五岁左右在商业保险和医疗保险后住院的后期护理费用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1505-1513. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05445.
8
How will provider-focused payment reform impact geographic variation in Medicare spending?以医疗服务提供者为中心的支付改革将如何影响医疗保险支出的地区差异?
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jun 1;21(6):e390-8.
9
Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.基于价值的支付改革中区域和州创新的新经验教训:平衡协作与颠覆性创新。
Milbank Q. 2014 Sep;92(3):568-623. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12078.
10
Does One Size Fit All With the Effects of Payment Reform? Dialysis Facility Payer Mix and Anemia Management Under the Expanded Medicare Prospective Payment System.支付方式改革的效果是否一刀切?扩大的 Medicare 前瞻性支付系统下的透析设施支付方组合和贫血管理。
Med Care. 2019 Aug;57(8):584-591. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001151.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative payment models in Dutch hospital care: what works, how, why and under what circumstances? Protocol for a realist evaluation study.荷兰医院护理中的替代支付模式:什么有效、如何有效、为什么有效以及在什么情况下有效?一项现实主义评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e082372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082372.
2
Value-Based Contracting in Clinical Care.临床护理中的基于价值的合同。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Aug 2;5(8):e242020. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2020.
3
Comparing Quality, Costs, and Outcomes of VA and Community Primary Care for Patients with Diabetes.
比较退伍军人事务部(VA)和社区初级医疗为糖尿病患者提供的医疗服务质量、成本及结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(3):647-653. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08968-4. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
4
Building alternative payment models in health care.构建医疗保健领域的替代支付模式。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Jun 14;4:1235913. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1235913. eCollection 2024.
5
Financing the "Village": Establishing a Sustainable Financial System for Child Behavioral Health.为“村”融资:建立儿童行为健康可持续金融体系。
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2024 Jul;33(3):457-470. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2024.03.008.
6
Joe's Story: How a Capitated Payment Model Lets Me Be the Physician I Want to Be.乔的故事:按人头付费模式如何让我成为我想成为的医生。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;22(2):167-169. doi: 10.1370/afm.3070.
7
Revising the Logic Model Behind Health Care's Social Care Investments.修订医疗保健社会投资背后的逻辑模型。
Milbank Q. 2024 Jun;102(2):325-335. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12690. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Association Between a Bundled Payment Program for Lower Extremity Joint Replacement and Patient Outcomes Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.下肢关节置换捆绑支付计划与医疗保险优势受益人的患者结局之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Jun 2;4(6):e231495. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.1495.
9
Value-Based Purchasing Design And Effect: A Systematic Review And Analysis.基于价值的采购设计与效果:系统评价与分析。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jun;42(6):813-821. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01455.
10
The Next Generation of Payment Reforms for Population Health - An Actionable Agenda for 2035 Informed by Past Gains and Ongoing Lessons.支付改革推动人群健康的新纪元——2035 年行动计划,基于既往成就与持续经验教训
Milbank Q. 2023 Apr;101(S1):866-892. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12632.