SRUC, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, UK.
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
Poult Sci. 2022 May;101(5):101838. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101838. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
Broiler breeder chickens are commercially feed restricted to slow their growth and improve their health and production, however, there is research demonstrating that this leads to chronic hunger resulting in poor welfare. A challenge in these studies is to account for possible daily rhythms or the effects of time since last meal on measures relating hunger. To address this, we used 3 feed treatments: AL (ad libitum fed), Ram (restricted, fed in the morning), and Rpm (restricted, fed in the afternoon) to control for diurnal effects. We then conducted foraging motivation tests and collected home pen behavior and physiological samples at 4 times relative to feeding throughout a 24-h period. The feed treatment had the largest influence on the data, with AL birds weighing more, having lower concentrations of plasma NEFA, and mRNA expression of AGRP and NPY alongside higher expression of POMC in the basal hypothalamus than Ram or Rpm birds (P < 0.001). R birds were more successful at and had a shorter latency to complete the motivation test, and did more walking and less feeding than AL birds in the home pen (P < 0.01). There was little effect of time since last meal on many measures (P > 0.05) but AGRP expression was highest in the basal hypothalamus shortly after a meal (P < 0.05), blood plasma NEFA was higher in R birds just before feeding (P < 0.001) and glucose was higher in Ram birds just after feeding (P < 0.001), and the latency to complete the motivation test was shortest before the next meal (P < 0.05). Time of day effects were mainly found in the difference in activity levels in the home pen when during lights on and lights off periods. In conclusion, many behavioral and physiological hunger measures were not significantly influenced by time of day or time since the last meal. For the measures that do change, future studies should be designed so that sampling is balanced in such a way as to minimize bias due to these effects.
肉鸡种鸡通常会被限制采食以减缓其生长速度,提高其健康和生产性能,但有研究表明,这会导致其长期处于饥饿状态,从而影响福利。在这些研究中,一个挑战是要考虑到可能的日常节律或上次进食后时间的影响,以评估与饥饿相关的测量指标。为了解决这个问题,我们使用了 3 种饲料处理方法:AL(自由采食)、Ram(限制采食,早上喂食)和 Rpm(限制采食,下午喂食)来控制昼夜影响。然后,我们进行了觅食动机测试,并在 24 小时内的 4 个时间点收集了家系行为和生理样本,这些时间点与喂食时间有关。饲料处理对数据的影响最大,与 Ram 或 Rpm 组相比,AL 组的鸟类体重更重,血浆 NEFA 浓度更低,AGRP 和 NPY 的 mRNA 表达水平更高,基础下丘脑中 POMC 的表达水平更高(P<0.001)。Ram 组在动机测试中更成功,完成测试的潜伏期更短,在家系围栏中行走的次数更多,进食的次数更少(P<0.01)。许多测量指标受上次进食时间的影响很小(P>0.05),但 AGRP 的表达在进食后不久的基础下丘脑中最高(P<0.05),Ram 组在即将进食前的血浆 NEFA 水平更高(P<0.001),Ram 组在进食后不久的血糖水平更高(P<0.001),完成动机测试的潜伏期在下次进食前最短(P<0.05)。主要在光照期间和光照关闭期间的家系围栏内的活动水平差异中发现了与时间有关的影响。总之,许多行为和生理饥饿测量指标不受时间或上次进食后时间的显著影响。对于确实发生变化的测量指标,未来的研究应该设计得更平衡,以便通过这些影响最小化采样偏差。