Zhang Zheng, Bonebrake Timothy C, Xing Shuang, Dingle Caroline, Ho Iris, Andersson Astrid A
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
School of Ecology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Glob Ecol Conserv. 2022 Jun;35:e02107. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02107. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
Pangolins have recently received significant media attention globally as the trade for their scales and meat is driving many species closer to extinction. As a result of this, there have been increased legal regulations placed on pangolin trade in recent years. The suggestion that pangolins may have been involved in the transmission of COVID-19 further brought the issues of pangolin consumption to the fore in 2020. However, we have little understanding of the attitudes of the general public towards pangolin consumption pre- or post the outbreak of COVID-19. We conducted surveys in Hong Kong, a critical transit hub in the trafficking routes for pangolins, in 2015 (n = 1037) and 2020 (n = 1028) to determine general attitudes towards pangolin consumption in the city, and whether these attitudes changed since the onset of COVID-19. We found low reported rates of pangolin consumption (< 1% of respondents) in both surveys, and most of the respondents who professed to eating pangolins were aged above 50. Perceptions of how trends in pangolin consumption are changing were consistent between 2015 and 2020, with 55% of the public in 2015 and 57% in 2020 believing that consumption has declined over time. In 2020, respondents cited conservation (endangered status of pangolins) and health concerns (risk of disease transmission) as the two primary reasons (> 50%) for declining attitudes toward consumption. Overall, COVID-19 does not, specifically, appear to be associated with changed perceptions of pangolin consumption in Hong Kong: > 75% of respondents stated that there is no relationship between pangolins and COVID-19, or were unsure about any such connection. Only 1% mentioned an awareness of the illegality of pangolin consumption as a reason for not consuming them. As such, our results challenge simple narratives regarding the impact of COVID-19 on pangolin consumption. We suggest that future demand reduction efforts could emphasize the conservation impact and health risks of consuming pangolins, and specifically focus on the older generations. As pangolins continue to be trafficked and threatened with extinction, further research into the perceptions and attitudes of consumers of these products is needed to inform targeted and effective interventions.
穿山甲最近在全球范围内受到了媒体的广泛关注,因为其鳞片和肉的贸易正使许多物种濒临灭绝。因此,近年来对穿山甲贸易的法律法规有所加强。2020年,穿山甲可能参与了新冠病毒传播的说法进一步凸显了穿山甲消费问题。然而,我们对新冠疫情爆发前后公众对穿山甲消费的态度了解甚少。我们于2015年(n = 1037)和2020年(n = 1028)在香港进行了调查,香港是穿山甲贸易路线上的一个关键中转站,以确定该市对穿山甲消费的总体态度,以及自新冠疫情爆发以来这些态度是否发生了变化。我们发现两次调查中报告的穿山甲消费率都很低(<1%的受访者),而且大多数自称食用过穿山甲的受访者年龄在50岁以上。2015年至2020年期间,公众对穿山甲消费趋势变化的看法是一致的,2015年55%的公众和2020年57%的公众认为穿山甲消费随时间推移有所下降。2020年,受访者将保护(穿山甲的濒危状态)和健康担忧(疾病传播风险)列为对穿山甲消费态度下降的两个主要原因(>50%)。总体而言,新冠疫情似乎并没有特别导致香港对穿山甲消费看法的改变:>75%的受访者表示穿山甲与新冠疫情没有关系,或者不确定是否存在这种联系。只有1%的人提到意识到穿山甲消费的非法性是不食用它们的一个原因。因此,我们的研究结果挑战了关于新冠疫情对穿山甲消费影响的简单说法。我们建议,未来减少需求的努力可以强调食用穿山甲对保护的影响和健康风险,并特别关注老年人群体。由于穿山甲继续遭到非法交易并面临灭绝威胁,需要进一步研究这些产品消费者的看法和态度,以便采取有针对性的有效干预措施。