• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们如何才能最好地帮助这位患者?探索挪威心理健康治疗师对精神病患者非药物治疗的看法。

How can we best help this patient? Exploring mental health therapists' reflections on medication-free care for patients with psychosis in Norway.

作者信息

Oedegaard Christine Henriksen, Ruano Ana Lorena, Blindheim Anne, Veseth Marius, Stige Brynjulf, Davidson Larry, Engebretsen Ingunn Marie Stadskleiv

机构信息

Centre for International Health, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Apr 4;16(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00529-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-022-00529-8
PMID:35379290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8978409/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2015, Norwegian Regional Health Authorities have followed new government policy and gradually implemented medication-free services for patients with psychosis. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore the tension between policy and practice, and how health care workers in Bergen reflect on their role in implementing medication-free treatment.

METHODS

We performed three focus group discussions including 17 therapists working within medication free services, asking about their experiences with this new treatment program. We used Systematic Text Condensation for data analysis. The findings were discussed using Michael Lipsky's theoretical framework on the role public health workers play in policy implementation.

FINDINGS

Following Norway's new policy was challenging for the therapists in our study, particularly balancing a patient's needs with treatment guidelines, the legal framework and available resources. Therapists had an overarching wish to help patients through cooperation and therapeutic alliance, but their alliance was sometimes fragile, and the therapists worried about patients' conditions worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

Democratization of treatment choices, with the aim of empowering patients in mental health care, challenges the level of professional discretion given that patients and therapists might have conflicting goals. Balancing the desire to help, professional responsibility, the perceived lack of resources, and certain patient choices created conditions that can leave therapists feeling disempowered in and alienated from their work.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

N/A.

摘要

背景

自2015年以来,挪威地方卫生当局遵循新的政府政策,逐步为精神病患者实施无药物治疗服务。这项定性研究的目的是探讨政策与实践之间的矛盾,以及卑尔根的医护人员如何看待自己在实施无药物治疗中的角色。

方法

我们进行了三次焦点小组讨论,参与讨论的有17名从事无药物治疗服务的治疗师,询问他们对这个新治疗项目的体验。我们使用系统文本浓缩法进行数据分析。研究结果依据迈克尔·利普斯基关于公共卫生工作者在政策实施中所扮演角色的理论框架进行讨论。

研究结果

在我们的研究中,遵循挪威的新政策对治疗师来说颇具挑战性,尤其是在平衡患者需求与治疗指南、法律框架及可用资源方面。治疗师们有着通过合作与治疗联盟来帮助患者的总体愿望,但他们的联盟有时很脆弱,治疗师们担心患者病情恶化。

结论

治疗选择的民主化旨在增强精神卫生保健中患者的权能,鉴于患者和治疗师可能有相互冲突的目标,这对专业自主权水平构成了挑战。平衡帮助患者的愿望、专业责任、资源匮乏的认知以及患者的某些选择所创造的条件,可能会让治疗师在工作中感到无权且疏离。

试验注册

无。

相似文献

1
How can we best help this patient? Exploring mental health therapists' reflections on medication-free care for patients with psychosis in Norway.我们如何才能最好地帮助这位患者?探索挪威心理健康治疗师对精神病患者非药物治疗的看法。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Apr 4;16(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00529-8.
2
Patient and therapist perspectives on alliance development: therapists' practice experiences as predictors.患者与治疗师对联盟发展的看法:治疗师的实践经验作为预测因素
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):317-27. doi: 10.1002/cpp.1891. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
3
"It means so much for me to have a choice": a qualitative study providing first-person perspectives on medication-free treatment in mental health care.“对我来说,有一个选择是非常重要的”:一项关于精神卫生保健中无药物治疗的第一人称视角的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02770-2.
4
Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing: a qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors.社区公共卫生护理中的基层官僚作风与政策实施:对学生和新手健康访视员经历的定性研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Nov;17(6):586-598. doi: 10.1017/S1463423616000220. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
5
User participation in a Municipal Acute Ward in Norway: dilemmas in the interface between policy ideals and work conditions.挪威一个市级急症病房中的患者参与:政策理想与工作条件之间的界面困境
Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Jun;32(2):815-823. doi: 10.1111/scs.12512. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Therapists' Experience of Video Consultation in Specialized Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study.新冠疫情期间专科心理健康服务中治疗师的视频咨询体验:定性访谈研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Jul 15;8(3):e23150. doi: 10.2196/23150.
7
The contribution of the quality of therapists' personal lives to the development of the working alliance.治疗师个人生活质量对工作联盟发展的贡献。
J Couns Psychol. 2013 Oct;60(4):483-95. doi: 10.1037/a0033643. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
8
Feeling "overloaded" and "shortcomings": milieu therapists' experiences of vulnerability in caring for severely mentally ill patients.“不堪重负”与“自身不足”:环境治疗师在照料重症精神病患者时的脆弱感体验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Jul 13;9:285-96. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S106310. eCollection 2016.
9
The importance of a good therapeutic alliance in promoting exercise motivation in a group of older Norwegians in the subacute phase of hip fracture; a qualitative study.在促进一群挪威老年人髋关节骨折亚急性期的运动动机方面,良好治疗联盟的重要性;一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01518-7.
10
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.

引用本文的文献

1
What is it all about? An explorative study of patients' experiences with medication free treatment.这一切是关于什么的?一项关于患者无药物治疗体验的探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06327-5.
2
Exploring the unconventional: health professionals' experiences into medication-free treatment for patients with severe mental illness.探索非传统方法:卫生专业人员为患有严重精神疾病患者提供无药物治疗的经验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06251-8.
3
"It has to be better, otherwise we will get stuck." A Review of Novel Directions for Mental Health Reform and Introducing Pilot Work in the Netherlands.“必须要更好,否则我们将陷入困境。”荷兰心理健康改革新方向及试点工作综述。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2023 Nov 17;19:e17450179271206. doi: 10.2174/0117450179271206231114064736. eCollection 2023.
4
Why do patients want medication free treatment for psychosis? An explorative study on reasons for applying to medication free programs.为什么患者想要接受无药物治疗精神病?一项关于申请无药物治疗项目的原因的探索性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05513-9.
5
Medication-Free Treatment in Mental Health Care How Does It Differ from Traditional Treatment?精神卫生保健中的无药物治疗 它与传统治疗有何不同?
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Feb 3;18:315-335. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S435610. eCollection 2024.
6
Medication-free mental health treatment: a focus group study of milieu therapeutic settings.无药物心理健康治疗:环境治疗环境的焦点小组研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 2;23(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05193-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Service Users Choose Medication-Free Psychiatric Treatment: A Mixed-Method Study of User Accounts.为何服务使用者选择非药物精神治疗:一项基于使用者叙述的混合方法研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jul 23;15:1647-1660. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S308151. eCollection 2021.
2
Mortality and non-use of antipsychotic drugs after acute admission in schizophrenia: A prospective total-cohort study.精神分裂症急性入院后抗精神病药物的死亡率和不使用率:一项前瞻性全队列研究。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Sep;235:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
3
Twenty-year effects of antipsychotics in schizophrenia and affective psychotic disorders.抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症和情感性精神病性障碍的 20 年效果。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(13):2681-2691. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720004778. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
4
The Paradox of Help-Seeking Behaviour in Psychosis.精神病患者寻求帮助行为的悖论。
Psychiatr Q. 2021 Jun;92(2):549-559. doi: 10.1007/s11126-020-09833-3.
5
"It means so much for me to have a choice": a qualitative study providing first-person perspectives on medication-free treatment in mental health care.“对我来说,有一个选择是非常重要的”:一项关于精神卫生保健中无药物治疗的第一人称视角的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02770-2.
6
Moral distress in acute psychiatric nursing: Multifaceted dilemmas and demands.急性精神病护理中的道德困境:多方面的困境和要求。
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Aug;27(5):1315-1326. doi: 10.1177/0969733019877526. Epub 2019 Oct 20.
7
Suicide in Schizophrenia: An Educational Overview.精神分裂症患者的自杀问题:教育概述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Jul 10;55(7):361. doi: 10.3390/medicina55070361.
8
Patient empowerment in risk management: a mixed-method study to explore mental health professionals' perspective.风险管理中的患者赋权:一项探索心理健康专业人员观点的混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4215-x.
9
Antipsychotic treatment - a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of qualitative studies.抗精神病药物治疗 - 系统文献回顾和定性研究的荟萃分析。
J Ment Health. 2020 Oct;29(5):513-523. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1581352. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Psychiatrists' reflections on a medication-free program for patients with psychosis.精神科医生对精神病患者非药物治疗方案的思考。
J Psychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;33(4):459-465. doi: 10.1177/0269881118822048. Epub 2019 Jan 24.