Suppr超能文献

与地塞米松标准治疗方案相比,在 COVID-19 重症患者中使用 3 天甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗。

Treatment with 3-day methylprednisolone pulses in severe cases of COVID-19 compared with the standard regimen protocol of dexamethasone.

机构信息

1st Department of Internal Medicine, Korgialenio-Benakio Red Cross General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

1st Department of Internal Medicine, Korgialenio-Benakio Red Cross General Hospital, Athens, Greece

出版信息

J Investig Med. 2022 Aug;70(6):1423-1428. doi: 10.1136/jim-2021-002274. Epub 2022 Apr 4.

Abstract

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, research has been focused on establishing effective treatments, especially for patients with severe pneumonia and hyperinflammation. The role and dose of corticosteroids remain obscure. We evaluated 58 patients with severe COVID-19 during two periods. 24 patients who received methylprednisolone pulses (250 mg/day intravenously for 3 days) were compared with 34 patients treated according to the standard dexamethasone protocol of 6 mg/day. Among non-intubated patients, the duration of hospitalization was shorter for those who received methylprednisolone pulses (9.5 vs 13.5, p<0.001). In a subgroup analysis of patients who required intubation, those treated with the dexamethasone protocol demonstrated a relative risk=1.89 (p=0.09) for dying, in contrast to the other group which showed a tendency towards extubation and discharge from the hospital. A 'delayed' need for intubation was also observed (6 vs 2 days, p=0.06). Treatment with methylprednisolone pulses significantly reduced hospitalization time. Although there was no statistically significant influence on the necessity for intubation, methylprednisolone pulses revealed a tendency to delay intubation and hospital discharges. This treatment could benefit patients in the hyperinflammatory phase of the disease.

摘要

自 COVID-19 爆发以来,研究一直集中在建立有效的治疗方法上,特别是针对严重肺炎和高炎症患者。皮质类固醇的作用和剂量仍然不清楚。我们在两个时期评估了 58 例严重 COVID-19 患者。将接受甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗(每天 250mg 静脉内滴注 3 天)的 24 例患者与根据标准地塞米松方案(每天 6mg)治疗的 34 例患者进行比较。在非插管患者中,接受甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗的患者住院时间更短(9.5 天 vs 13.5 天,p<0.001)。在需要插管的患者亚组分析中,接受地塞米松方案治疗的患者死亡的相对风险=1.89(p=0.09),而另一组则有拔管和出院的趋势。还观察到“延迟”需要插管的情况(6 天 vs 2 天,p=0.06)。甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗显著缩短了住院时间。尽管对插管的必要性没有统计学上的显著影响,但甲基强的松龙脉冲治疗显示出延迟插管和出院的趋势。这种治疗方法可能对疾病的高炎症期患者有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验